{"id":35450,"date":"2020-07-03T16:55:33","date_gmt":"2020-07-04T00:55:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=35450"},"modified":"2020-07-03T16:55:33","modified_gmt":"2020-07-04T00:55:33","slug":"mutiny-on-the-bounties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2020\/07\/03\/mutiny-on-the-bounties\/","title":{"rendered":"Mutiny on the Bounties"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Corporate media are bringing on leaked Kool Aid not unlike the WMD concoction they offered 18 years ago to \u201cjustify\u201d the U.S.-UK war of aggression on Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>Now Michael McFaul, ambassador to Russia under President Obama, has been enlisted by <i>The Washington Post<\/i>\u2019s editorial page honcho, Fred Hiatt, to draw on his expertise (read, incurable Russophobia) to help stick President Donald Trump back into \u201cPutin\u2019s pocket.\u201d (This has become increasingly urgent as the canard of \u201cRussiagate\u201d &#8211; including the linchpin claim that Russia hacked the DNC &#8211; lies gasping for air.)<\/p>\n<p>In an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/outlook\/trump-would-do-anything-for-putin-no-wonder-hes-ignoring-the-russian-bounties\/2020\/07\/01\/0013f1d0-bb19-11ea-8cf5-9c1b8d7f84c6_story.html\">oped<\/a> on Thursday McFaul presented a long list of Vladimir Putin\u2019s alleged crimes, offering a more ostensibly sophisticated version of amateur Russian specialist, Rep. Jason Crow\u2019s (D-CO) claim that: \u201cVladimir Putin wakes up every morning and goes to bed every night trying to figure out how to destroy American democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>McFaul had &#8211; well, let\u2019s call it an undistinguished career in Moscow. He arrived with a huge chip on his shoulder and proceeded to alienate just about all his hosts, save for the rabidly anti-Putin folks he openly and proudly cultivated. In a sense, McFaul became the epitome of what Henry Wooton described as the role of ambassador &#8211; \u201can honest man sent to lie abroad for the good of his country.\u201d What should not be so readily accepted is an ambassador who comes back home and just can\u2019t stop misleading.<\/p>\n<p>Not to doubt McFaul\u2019s ulterior motives; one must assume him to be an \u201chonest man\u201d &#8211; however misguided, in my opinion. He seems to be a disciple of the James Clapper-Curtis LeMay-Joe McCarthy School of Russian Analysis. <\/p>\n<p>Clapper, a graduate<i> summa cum laude<\/i>, certainly had the Russians pegged! Clapper was allowed to stay as Barack Obama&#8217;s director of national intelligence for three and a half years after perjuring himself in formal Senate testimony (on NSA\u2019s illegal eavesdropping). On May 28, 2017 Clapper <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/meet-the-press\/meet-press-may-28-2017-n765626\">told<\/a> NBC\u2019s Chuck Todd about \u201cthe historical practices of the Russians, who typically, are almost genetically driven to co-opt, penetrate, gain favor, whatever, which is a typical Russian technique.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"James Clapper: Dashboard Light Was On Over Trump Campaign, Russia (Full) | Meet The Press | NBC News\" width=\"860\" height=\"484\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/tcN_tWk089w?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>As a finale, in full knowledge of Clapper\u2019s proclivities regarding Russia, Obama appointed him to prepare the evidence-impoverished, misnomered \u201cIntelligence Community Assessment\u201d claiming that Putin did all he could, including hacking the DNC, to help Trump get elected &#8211; the most embarrassing such \u201cintelligence assessment\u201d I have seen in half a century .<\/p>\n<p><b>Obama and the National Security State<\/b><\/p>\n<p>I have asked myself if Obama also had earned some kind of degree from the Clapper\/LeMay\/McCarthy School, or whether he simply lacked the courage to challenge the pitiably self-serving \u201canalysis\u201d of the National Security State. Then I <a href=\"https:\/\/consortiumnews.com\/2010\/062410a.html\">re-read<\/a> \u201cObama Misses the Afghan Exit-Ramp\u201d of June 24, 2010 and was reminded of how deferential Obama was to the generals and the intelligence gurus, and how unconscionable the generals were &#8211; like their predecessors in Vietnam &#8211; in lying about always seeing light at the end of the proverbial tunnel. <\/p>\n<p>Thankfully, now ten years later, this is all <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/graphics\/2019\/investigations\/afghanistan-papers\/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents\/\">documented<\/a> in Craig Whitlock\u2019s, \u201cThe Afghanistan Papers: At War With the Truth.\u201d Corporate media, who played an essential role in that \u201cwar with the truth\u201d, have not given Whitlock\u2019s damning story the attention it should command (surprise, surprise!). In any case, it strains credulity to think that Obama was unaware he was being lied to on Afghanistan. <\/p>\n<p><b>Some Questions <\/b><\/p>\n<p>Does no one see the irony today in the Democrats\u2019 bashing Trump on Afghanistan, with the full support of the Establishment media? The inevitable defeat there is one of the few demonstrable disasters not attributable directly to Trump, but you would not know that from the media. Are the uncorroborated reports of Russian bounties to kill U.S. troops aimed at making it appear that Trump, unable to stand up to Putin, let the Russians drive the rest of US troops out of Afghanistan?<\/p>\n<p>Does the current flap bespeak some kind of \u201cMutiny on the Bounties,\u201d so to speak, by a leaker aping Eric Chiaramella? Recall that the Democrats lionized the CIA official seconded to Trump&#8217;s national security council as a &#8220;whistleblower&#8221; and proceeded to impeach Trump after Chiaramella leaked information on Trump\u2019s telephone call with the president of Ukraine. Far from being held to account, Chiaramella is probably expecting an influential job if his patron, Joe Biden, is elected president. Has there been another mutiny in Trump&#8217;s White House?<\/p>\n<p>And what does one make of the <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2020\/07\/02\/house-democrats-working-with-liz-cheney-restrict-trumps-planned-withdrawal-of-troops-from-afghanistan-and-germany\/\">spectacle<\/a> of Congressman Jason Crow (D-WY) teaming up with Rep. Liz Cheney (R, WY) to restrict Trump\u2019s planned pullout of troops from Afghanistan, which <i>The Los Angeles Times <\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/politics\/story\/2020-07-02\/afghanistan-trump-withdrawal-on-track\">reports<\/a> has now been blocked until after the election?<\/p>\n<p><b>Hiatt &amp; McFaul: Caveat Editor<\/b><\/p>\n<p>And who published McFaul\u2019s oped? Fred Hiatt, <i>Washington Post <\/i>editorial page editor for the past 20 years, who has a long record of listening to the whispers of anonymous intelligence sources and submerging\/drowning the subjunctive mood with flat fact. This was the case with the (nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the U.S.-UK attack. Readers of the<i> Post<\/i> were sure there were tons of WMD in Iraq. That Hiatt has invited McFaul on stage should come as no surprise.<\/p>\n<p>To be fair, Hiatt belatedly acknowledged that the <i>Post<\/i> should have been more circumspect in its confident claims about the WMD. \u201cIf you look at the editorials we write running up [to the war], we state as flat fact that he [Saddam Hussein] has weapons of mass destruction,\u201d Hiatt said in an interview with the <i>Columbia Journalism Review<\/i>. \u201cIf that\u2019s not true, it would have been better not to say it.\u201d [CJR, March\/April 2004]<\/p>\n<p>At this word of wisdom, <i><b>Consortium News<\/b><\/i> founder, the late Robert Parry, offered this comment: \u201cYes, that is a common principle of journalism, that if something isn\u2019t real, we\u2019re not supposed to confidently declare that it is.\u201d That Hiatt is still in that job speaks volumes.<\/p>\n<p><b>&#8216;Uncorroborated, Contradicted, or Even Non-Existent&#8217;<\/b><\/p>\n<p>It is sad to have to remind folks 18 years later that the \u201cintelligence\u201d on WMD in Iraq was not \u201cmistaken;\u201d it was fraudulent from the get-go. The culprits were finally exposed but never held to account.<\/p>\n<p>Announcing on June 5, 2008, the bipartisan conclusions from a five-year study by the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Jay Rockefeller ( D-WV) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.intelligence.senate.gov\/press\/senate-intelligence-committee-unveils-final-phase-ii-reports-prewar-iraq-intelligence\">said<\/a> the attack on Iraq was launched \u201cunder false pretenses.\u201d He described the intelligence conjured up to \u201cjustify\u201d war on Iraq as \u201cuncorroborated, contradicted, or even non-existent.\u201d <\/p>\n<p><b>Homework<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s an assignment due on Monday. Read McFaul\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/outlook\/trump-would-do-anything-for-putin-no-wonder-hes-ignoring-the-russian-bounties\/2020\/07\/01\/0013f1d0-bb19-11ea-8cf5-9c1b8d7f84c6_story.html\">oped<\/a> carefully. It appears under the title: \u201cTrump would do anything for Putin. No wonder he\u2019s ignoring the Russian bounties: Russia\u2019s pattern of hostility matches Trump\u2019s pattern of accommodation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And to give you a further taste, here is the first paragraph:<\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cRussian President Vladimir Putin appears to have paid Taliban rebels in Afghanistan to kill US soldiers. Having resulted in at least one American death, and maybe more, these Russian bounties reportedly produced the desired outcome. While deeply disturbing, this effort by Putin is not surprising: It follows a clear pattern of ignoring international norms, rules and laws &#8211; and daring the United States to do anything about it.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Full assignment for Monday: Read carefully through each paragraph of McFaul\u2019s text and select which of his claims you would put into one or more of the three categories adduced by Sen. Rockefeller 12 years ago about WMD on Iraq. With particular attention to the evidence behind McFaul\u2019s claims, determine which of the claims is (a) \u201cuncorroborated\u201d; which (b) \u201ccontradicted\u201d; and which (c) \u201cnonexistent;\u201d or (d) all of the above. For extra credit, find one that is supported by plausible evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Yogi Berra might be surprised to hear us keep quoting him with \u201cDeja vu, all over again.\u201d Sorry, Yogi, that\u2019s what it is; you coined it.<\/p>\n<p><i>Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. His 27-year career as a CIA analyst includes serving as Chief of the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch and preparer\/briefer of the President\u2019s Daily Brief. He is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). This originally appeared at <a href=\"https:\/\/consortiumnews.com\">Consortium News<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Corporate media are bringing on leaked Kool Aid not unlike the WMD concoction they offered 18 years ago to \u201cjustify\u201d the U.S.-UK war of aggression on Iraq. Now Michael McFaul, ambassador to Russia under President Obama, has been enlisted by The Washington Post\u2019s editorial page honcho, Fred Hiatt, to draw on his expertise (read, incurable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-35450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"Has there been another mutiny in Trump\u2019s White House, as Obama\u2019s former ambassador to Russia piles on the nonsense about Trump being in Putin\u2019s pocket?"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35450"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35450\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35452,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35450\/revisions\/35452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35450"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=35450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}