{"id":36218,"date":"2020-10-21T07:17:49","date_gmt":"2020-10-21T15:17:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=36218"},"modified":"2020-10-21T07:17:49","modified_gmt":"2020-10-21T15:17:49","slug":"just-say-no-to-a-karabakh-no-fly-zone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2020\/10\/21\/just-say-no-to-a-karabakh-no-fly-zone\/","title":{"rendered":"Just Say No to a Karabakh &#8216;No-Fly Zone&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/\">The American Conservative<\/a>:<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The renewed fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Karabakh has not drawn that much attention in the West, but many of the initial, knee-jerk responses to the conflict have been remarkably bad. Whether it is members of Congress <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/gracenapolitano\/status\/1318625842252173315?s=20\">urging<\/a> U.S. recognition of an independent Artsakh, pro-Azerbaijan advocates <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/pro-western-azerbaijan-deserves-american-support-opinion-1540120\">calling<\/a> for US support for the aggressor, or Iran hawks <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/matthew_petti\/status\/1312126425118302208\">cheering on<\/a> aggression against Armenians because they have the &#8220;wrong&#8221; geopolitical alignment, many Americans are eager to co-opt and meddle in a conflict that has nothing to do with us. David Ignatius <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/global-opinions\/whats-needed-for-a-first-step-toward-peace-for-armenia-and-azerbaijan\/2020\/10\/20\/cd00693c-1319-11eb-ad6f-36c93e6e94fb_story.html\">takes<\/a> the cake with his new proposal to impose a &#8220;no-fly zone&#8221; in the South Caucasus (a region whose <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DanielLarison\/status\/1313951929647730688?s=20\">name<\/a> he <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/luciadltorre\/status\/1311224998108057600?s=20\">doesn&#8217;t know how to spell<\/a>):<\/p>\n<p><i>Here\u2019s a simple suggestion for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is scheduled to meet Friday with the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan: The path to real negotiations and stability in Karabakh could begin with a no-fly zone over the enclave, enforced by the United States, Russia and France, the three co-chairs of the \u201cMinsk Group\u201d that had been fruitlessly attempting to settle the Karabakh issue since 1992.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>This is a terrible proposal for reasons that I hope are so obvious that they don&#8217;t need to be spelled out, but let&#8217;s review some of the chief problems. Ignatius has been banging the drum to &#8220;do something&#8221; about the new war over Karabakh for weeks, but this is the first time that he has explicitly called for military action. It is a mindless, reflexive demand for intervention that makes absolutely no sense. &#8220;No-fly zones&#8221; by themselves do not halt conflicts, and at best this would just expand the conflict to include more belligerents. It is difficult to see where US planes would be enforcing this &#8220;no-fly zone&#8221; from, since it is doubtful Turkey would permit basing or overflight for such a mission, and there is a decent chance that the US might have to enforce this &#8220;no-fly zone&#8221; against Turkish jets at some point. Ignatius&#8217; proposal is hopelessly naive and extremely dangerous.<\/p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/state-of-the-union\/just-say-no-to-a-karabakh-no-fly-zone\/\">Read the rest of the article<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From The American Conservative: The renewed fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Karabakh has not drawn that much attention in the West, but many of the initial, knee-jerk responses to the conflict have been remarkably bad. Whether it is members of Congress urging U.S. recognition of an independent Artsakh, pro-Azerbaijan advocates calling for US support [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-36218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36218"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36218\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36221,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36218\/revisions\/36221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36218"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=36218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}