{"id":37854,"date":"2021-08-11T11:50:52","date_gmt":"2021-08-11T19:50:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=37854"},"modified":"2021-08-11T11:51:50","modified_gmt":"2021-08-11T19:51:50","slug":"conflicts-of-interest-american-leaders-weaponize-the-chinese-boogeyman-for-political-gain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2021\/08\/11\/conflicts-of-interest-american-leaders-weaponize-the-chinese-boogeyman-for-political-gain\/","title":{"rendered":"<I>Conflicts of Interest<\/I>: American Leaders Weaponize the \u2018Chinese Boogeyman&#8217; for Political Gain"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On COI #147, Dave DeCamp \u2013 News Editor at Antiwar.com \u2013 returns to the show to discuss how American pols increasingly use China as a political weapon. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently warned that the US must pass a massive infrastructure spending bill or risk \u2018losing\u2019 to China. He also warned that Beijing is in the midst of a nuclear buildup. However, the Chinese nuclear arsenal is many times smaller than the American arsenal, and the US is planning to spend trillions updating its own nuclear weapons stockpile.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The US is working to influence the geopolitics of Southeast Asia against China, forming stronger ties with many of the country\u2019s neighbors and endorsing territorial claims that rival Beijing\u2019s. The last several US administrations have also sought to form stronger ties with Taiwan, including through arms sales, while an American commander recently stated the US is ready and able to defend the island.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dave and Kyle update the Taliban offensive in Afghanistan. Provincial capitals are falling at a rapid pace as the Biden administration continues to say it is holding firm on the August 31st withdrawal date. The US still has 650 troops deployed to the Kabul embassy and is bombing Taliban targets at an increasing rate. However, the US airstrikes are not enough to turn back Taliban advances. Dave and Kyle discuss what Biden will do as the crumbling Afghan state faces tough decisions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Mercer Street was the first of two cargo ships attacked off the coast of Oman in recent weeks. The attack was blamed on Iran by the US, Israel and many Western allies. Israel is demanding action against Iran \u2013 which has denied involvement \u2013 and even suggested it would carry out a unilateral response. New reports from the UK press say British special forces are working with their American counterparts on the ground in eastern Yemen to bring the culprits to justice. Dave and Kyle examine the possible actors behind the attacks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dave updates the US mission in Iraq. A recent agreement between Washington and Baghdad said the American mission would shift to training only. However, that agreement appears to be a PR stunt attempting to appease the American and Iraqi people&#8217;s desire for the occupation to finally end.<\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>Subscribe on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCXsiX0NOIXbKLd8kNPbKjjQ\">YouTube<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/libertarianinstitute.org\/kyle\/coi-147-american-leaders-weaponize-the-chinese-boogeyman-for-political-gain\/\">audio only.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/8hfmaJbTKmg\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On COI #147, Dave DeCamp \u2013 News Editor at Antiwar.com \u2013 returns to the show to discuss how American pols increasingly use China as a political weapon. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently warned that the US must pass a massive infrastructure spending bill or risk \u2018losing\u2019 to China. He also warned that Beijing is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":495,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-37854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/495"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37854"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37854\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37856,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37854\/revisions\/37856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37854"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=37854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}