{"id":37894,"date":"2021-08-18T07:29:48","date_gmt":"2021-08-18T15:29:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=37894"},"modified":"2021-08-18T07:30:19","modified_gmt":"2021-08-18T15:30:19","slug":"conflicts-of-interest-scott-horton-on-the-end-of-a-fools-errand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2021\/08\/18\/conflicts-of-interest-scott-horton-on-the-end-of-a-fools-errand\/","title":{"rendered":"<I>Conflicts of Interest<\/I>: Scott Horton on the End of a Fool&#8217;s Errand"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On COI #150 the great Scott Horton returns to the show to discuss the collapse of America\u2019s sockpuppet government in Kabul. Scott explains how he seemed to be one of the only Afghan War analysts to correctly predict how quickly \u2013 and mostly bloodlessly \u2013 the Afghan government would collapse. He talks about the Taliban\u2019s gains in recent years and how they were primed to consolidate their power.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With the Taliban now in control of almost all of Afghanistan, some Afghans \u2013 and nearly all of the corporate media \u2013 believe the Taliban will return to their same harsh style of rule from the pre-9\/11 era. However, Scott explains there are some reasons to be hopeful that the Taliban\u2019s rule may be less brutal \u2013 although still horrible. Since taking power the Taliban has made an effort to create the appearance that women will be accepted into society and the government. The group has said they are not seeking reprisals and Kabul, at the moment, remains calm under their rule.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In response to the withdrawal, the hawks\u2019 favorite trope has been to claim the Taliban takeover makes the world more dangerous for Americans. Scott debunks the myth that the Taliban offers \u2018safe haven\u2019 to groups that want to murder Americans. However, less than a year ago, the US was backing the Taliban with drone strikes against ISIS-K, with soldiers even dubbing themselves the \u201cTaliban\u2019s air force.\u201d Reports claiming an al-Qaeda presence in Afghanistan are nothing more than hearsay.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A second tactic being used by the corporate press is to spin the rise of the Taliban into a threat to American hegemony over Russia and China. Scott dismantles the argument that Chinese influence in Afghanistan is a concern for Americans. Scott also discussed the issue of Uyghur jihadists who take refuge in Afghanistan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kyle rounds out the show by asking Scott if he thinks America\u2019s war in Afghanistan is over. Scott explains that the US does not have the ability to redeploy occupation forces to the country. The US would also struggle to carry out special forces missions because of Afghanistan&#8217;s isolated location, though Scott says the US may try to continue CIA operations to undermine the Taliban.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>Subscribe on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCXsiX0NOIXbKLd8kNPbKjjQ\">YouTube<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/libertarianinstitute.org\/kyle\/conflicts-of-interest-150-scott-horton-on-the-end-of-a-fools-errand\/\">audio only.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/pD-wKP3ZZpI\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On COI #150 the great Scott Horton returns to the show to discuss the collapse of America\u2019s sockpuppet government in Kabul. Scott explains how he seemed to be one of the only Afghan War analysts to correctly predict how quickly \u2013 and mostly bloodlessly \u2013 the Afghan government would collapse. He talks about the Taliban\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":495,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-37894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37894","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/495"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37894"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37894\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37895,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37894\/revisions\/37895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37894"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=37894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}