{"id":38506,"date":"2021-12-13T12:51:46","date_gmt":"2021-12-13T20:51:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=38506"},"modified":"2021-12-13T12:51:46","modified_gmt":"2021-12-13T20:51:46","slug":"competition-with-china-will-be-bad-for-democracy-here-and-around-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2021\/12\/13\/competition-with-china-will-be-bad-for-democracy-here-and-around-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Competition’ With China Will Be Bad for Democracy Here and Around the World"},"content":{"rendered":"

Matt Yglesias embraces<\/a> the hypocrisy of Biden\u2019s democracy summit and calls for even more of it:<\/p>\n

The fight for democracy is too important to conduct on ideological grounds alone; to win, the US will need an appropriate amount of realpolitik. America can say it cares about democracy \u2013 and actually take steps to protect and promote it \u2013 but the real focus should be competing with China, with all the compromises that will entail. <\/i><\/p>\n

Both the \u201cfight for democracy\u201d and the \u201ccompetition\u201d with China are very poorly defined, and it isn\u2019t clear how the US would \u201cwin\u201d either one. What does \u201cwinning\u201d look like? Does it mean having a democratically elected Chinese government by the end of the century? Does it mean simply bottling up Chinese influence as much as possible through an anti-Chinese \u201ccoalition of the willing\u201d? To what end? I don\u2019t think anyone knows the answers to any of these questions. <\/p>\n

It is simply taken for granted that there must be a \u201ccompetition\u201d with China and that it will therefore involve the kinds of awful tradeoffs that the US made during the Cold War. That \u201ccompetition\u201d needs some sort of ideological significance attached to it so that it isn\u2019t simply crude Machtpolitik<\/em>, so we claim to be standing up for democracy. There is supposed to be tension between democracy promotion and \u201cstrategic competition,\u201d but if we assume that the former is mostly window-dressing for the \u201creal\u201d contest there is no contradiction to be resolved. After all, the difference in our political systems is not the real reason why the US and China are now moving on a collision course, and that difference did not prevent our governments from cooperating earlier when they judged it to be useful. <\/p>\n

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

Daniel Larison is a weekly columnist for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia<\/a>. He is former senior editor at<\/i> The American Conservative. He has been published in the<\/i> New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and<\/i> Culture11, and was a columnist for<\/i> The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Matt Yglesias embraces the hypocrisy of Biden\u2019s democracy summit and calls for even more of it: The fight for democracy is too important to conduct on ideological grounds alone; to win, the US will need an appropriate amount of realpolitik. America can say it cares about democracy \u2013 and actually take steps to protect and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-38506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"It is simply taken for granted that there must be a \u201ccompetition\u201d with China and that it will therefore involve the kinds of awful tradeoffs that the U.S. made during the Cold War."},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38506"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38508,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38506\/revisions\/38508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38506"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=38506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}