preserve a copy<\/a>. The manual relies on abstractions and euphemism to depict the unthinkable. It says, "The employment of nuclear weapons could have a significant influence on ground operations." Of course "employment" means detonation, and "significant influence" means searing fireballs, vaporized victims, blast and shock-wave devastation, demolished hospitals and schools, vast firestorms, and permanent radioactive contamination of water, soil, and the food chain.<\/p>\nThe manual explains that nuclear attacks create "conditions" without describing them. It says, "Using nuclear weapons could create conditions for decisive results and the restoration of strategic stability." Then, as if US presidents had never said, "Nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought," the report pretends it can and should. "[T]he use of a nuclear weapon will…create conditions that affect how commanders will prevail in conflict."<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
US nuclear war practice takes place routinely with allied European militaries. "Steadfast Noon" is NATO\u2019s code name for its annual nuclear attack practice, and Hans Kristensen reports for the Federation of American Scientists that, \u201cThis is the exercise that practices NATO\u2019s nuclear strike mission with the B61 … nuclear bombs the US deploys in Europe.\u201d Jan Merička wrote in European Security Journal News Oct. 19, 2017, that Steadfast Noon is designed "to simulate nuclear strikes…and was conducted from the Kleine Brogel Air Base in Belgium and Büchel Air Base in Germany, where US B61 thermonuclear bombs with the force of up to 340 kilotons of TNT are stored." (FYI: Hiroshima was incinerated with a 15 kiloton US bomb.)<\/p>\n
To illustrate the Pentagon\u2019s ho-hum acceptance of mass destruction, it recently opened in Omaha its new, $1.3 billion Strategic Command headquarters for supervising and targeting the nuclear arsenal, and it named the building after General Curtis LeMay, who, the Omaha World Herald <\/i>reported, designed and conducted the incendiary bombing of 60 Japanese cities at the end of WWII, bombing that "incinerated entire cities" killing as many as 900,000 civilians. General LeMay\u2019s motto and that of Strategic Command used to be "Death from Above," but after the war it was changed to "Peace is Our Profession."<\/p>\n
In Germany, readiness for attacks with nuclear weapons is maintained by the USAF 702nd Munitions Support Squadron, which tends to Germany\u2019s 33rd Fighter-Bomber Wing at Büchel Air Force Base. Headlines from last October\u2019s bombing "theater" included, and "NATO Holds Secret Nuclear War Exercises in Germany," "German Air Force training for nuclear war as part of NATO;" from 2017, "NATO nuclear weapons exercise unusually open"; and in 2015, "NATO nuclear weapons exercise Steadfast Noon in Büchel." <\/p>\n
While the uninitiated might be aghast, the US military plans and prepares all year round for nuclear attacks at its far-flung "Defense Nuclear Weapons School" of the Air Force Nuclear College. According to the school\u2019s website, one branch (of "Armageddon Academy") is at the Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany, the largest US military base outside the country. Other branches are in New Mexico, Florida, Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Ohio. Outlines for this school\u2019s ghoulish courses can been read online. (The site may have been altered since I first reported on it in last June.) For example, the school says boastfully that it "is responsible for delivering, sustaining and supporting air-delivered nuclear weapon systems for our warfighters \u2026 every day."<\/p>\n
Course outlines on the website include, "Theater Nuclear Operations, a 4.5-day course that provides training for planners, support staff, targeteers, and staff nuclear planners for joint operations and targeting. The course provides an overview of nuclear weapon design, capabilities, and effects\u2026. Objectives: \u2026Understand the US nuclear planning and execution process; Understand the targeting effects of nuclear weapon employment." Another class is, "Integrated Munitions Effects Assessment \u2026 a five-day course that provides students \u2026 proficiency in creating target models, developing attack plans using \u2026 nuclear weapons\u2026." Students "will be able to import, edit, and modify target sites", "Calculate probabilistic attacks against predefined targets; [and] develop attack plans using \u2026 nuclear weapons.\u2026"<\/p>\n
I am of the mind that setting the stage for nuclear attacks is both criminal and insane. Luckily, millions of people are involved in the newly invigorated movement to rid the world of such madness, via the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Read it sometime.<\/p>\n
John LaForge is Co-director of Nukewatch, a peace and environmental justice group in Wisconsin, and is co-editor with Arianne Peterson of<\/i> Nuclear Heartland, Revised: A Guide to the 450 Land-Based Missiles of the United States.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
While Civil Society and a global movement work steadfastly across dozens of fields for the abolition of nuclear weapons, planning, preparations, and rehearsals for attacks using deployed H-bombs and nuclear missiles are routine in the US military and NATO. Two years ago, the US Joint Chief of Staff published online, then quickly deleted, its thermonuclear […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":324,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-38565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/324"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38565"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38565\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38567,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38565\/revisions\/38567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38565"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=38565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}