{"id":39804,"date":"2022-05-16T11:08:31","date_gmt":"2022-05-16T19:08:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=39804"},"modified":"2022-05-16T11:08:31","modified_gmt":"2022-05-16T19:08:31","slug":"biden-escalates-in-somalia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2022\/05\/16\/biden-escalates-in-somalia\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden Escalates in Somalia"},"content":{"rendered":"

Biden is sending<\/a> more troops back into one of the endless wars:<\/p>\n

President Biden has signed an order authorizing the military to once again deploy hundreds of Special Operations forces inside Somalia \u2013 largely reversing the decision by President Donald J. Trump to withdraw nearly all 700 ground troops who had been stationed there, according to four officials familiar with the matter.<\/i><\/p>\n

In addition, Mr. Biden has approved a Pentagon request for standing authority to target about a dozen suspected leaders of Al Shabab, the Somali terrorist group that is affiliated with Al Qaeda, three of the officials said. Since Mr. Biden took office, airstrikes have largely been limited to those meant to defend partner forces facing an immediate threat.<\/i><\/p>\n

The earlier withdrawal from Somalia did not mean<\/a> that the US was no longer involved in the conflict, but pulling troops out of there was one of the few things that Trump got right. Reversing that withdrawal is a mistake, and launching more strikes in Somalia practically guarantees that more Somali civilians will be killed by US attacks. US military involvement in Somalia is relatively limited, but it is still unnecessary and ill-advised. Limited US involvement is how it has been possible for the last three presidents and now Biden to wage a war there that most Americans know nothing about. That has happened because there has been scant oversight and no pressure on any administration to justify the continuation of the war.<\/p>\n

The legal authority for US involvement in Somalia\u2019s conflict is as shaky as it gets. Because Al Shabaab is considered an \u201cassociate force\u201d of Al Qaeda, the government claims<\/a> that the 2001 AUMF applies to a group that didn\u2019t exist when the AUMF was written. This is a prime example of why the 2001 AUMF needs to be repealed: it gives any president a free hand to wage war virtually anywhere against any group provided that there is some notional link with Al Qaeda. It is absurd to think that Al Shabaab poses any threat to the United States, so it is hard to see how any genuine US security interests are being served by expanding our role in the war. <\/p>\n

There was an opportunity here for Biden to change<\/a> the policy he inherited in a way that wouldn\u2019t repeat the mistakes that the US has been making in Somalia for decades, but instead he has decided on going back to a militarized approach that was bringing Somalia neither peace nor security. As Elizabeth Shackelford explained<\/a> shortly after the 2020 election, US intervention in Somalia was not succeeding in defeating Al Shabaab:<\/p>\n

The security situation has remained a violent stalemate. Somalia\u2019s President Mohamed Abdullahi recently declared that \u2013 with US assistance \u2013 Somalia is \u201con the brink of defeating\u201d al-Shabaab, the al Qaeda-affiliated group we are fighting there. The consistency of al-Shabaab\u2019s attacks and civilian casualties for several years now suggests otherwise. US military leaders have conceded that military defeat of al-Shabaab is not possible and that the conflict will only be won by addressing the underlying causes of extremism in that country with better governance. In the absence of any signs that governance will improve on its current course, maintaining the same military-led strategy is counterproductive.<\/i><\/p>\n

Read the rest of the article at SubStack<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

Daniel Larison is a weekly columnist for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia<\/a>. He is former senior editor at<\/i> The American Conservative. He has been published in the<\/i> New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and<\/i> Culture11, and was a columnist for<\/i> The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Biden is sending more troops back into one of the endless wars: President Biden has signed an order authorizing the military to once again deploy hundreds of Special Operations forces inside Somalia \u2013 largely reversing the decision by President Donald J. Trump to withdraw nearly all 700 ground troops who had been stationed there, according […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-39804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"It is absurd to think that Al Shabaab poses any threat to the United States, so it is hard to see how any genuine U.S. security interests are being served by expanding our role in the war."},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39804"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39807,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39804\/revisions\/39807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39804"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=39804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}