{"id":3993,"date":"2007-10-19T17:06:39","date_gmt":"2007-10-20T00:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/10\/19\/the-syrian-nuke-hoax\/"},"modified":"2007-10-19T17:06:39","modified_gmt":"2007-10-20T00:06:39","slug":"the-syrian-nuke-hoax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/10\/19\/the-syrian-nuke-hoax\/","title":{"rendered":"The Syrian &#8216;Nuke&#8217; Hoax"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I said <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/justin\/?articleid=11756\">here<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0&#8212; and, earlier, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/10\/05\/mystery-achievement\/\">here<\/a> &#8212; the whole Syrian &#8220;nuclear&#8221; facility that the Israelis supposedly took out, in a faux-<a href=\"http:\/\/www.opinionjournal.com\/columnists\/bstephens\/?id=110010619\">replay<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/onthisday\/hi\/dates\/stories\/june\/7\/newsid_3014000\/3014623.stm\">Osirak<\/a> narrative, <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/2007\/US_Intelligence_does_not_show_Syrian_1018.html\">turned out<\/a> to be a hoax:<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;According to current and former intelligence sources, the US intelligence community has seen no evidence of a nuclear facility being hit. US intelligence &#8216;found no radiation signatures after the bombing, so there was no uranium or plutonium present,&#8217; said one official, wishing to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the subject. &#8216;We don&#8217;t have any independent intelligence that it was a nuclear facility &#8212; only the assertions by the Israelis and some ambiguous satellite photography from them that shows a building, which the Syrians admitted was a military facility.&#8217;\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Now that the IAEA is has the satellite photos, the truth is about to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/12784361\/\">come out<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p class=\"textBodyBlack\"><span id=\"byLine\" \/><em>One of the diplomats indicated that the photos came from U.S intelligence. Two others said the images, which have been studied by experts of the International Atomic Energy <\/em><em>Agency since being received on Thursday, do not at first examination appear to substantiate reports that the target was a nuclear installation, but emphasized that the images were still under examination.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"textBodyBlack\">The serial liars running our foreign policy don&#8217;t care if their\u00c2\u00a0deceptions are exposed: the value of lying is the impression it leaves. Many heard about the Syrian &#8220;nukes,&#8221; few will notice the debunking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I said here\u00c2\u00a0&#8212; and, earlier, here &#8212; the whole Syrian &#8220;nuclear&#8221; facility that the Israelis supposedly took out, in a faux-replay of the Osirak narrative, turned out to be a hoax: &#8220;According to current and former intelligence sources, the US intelligence community has seen no evidence of a nuclear facility being hit. US intelligence [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3993"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3993\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3993"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}