{"id":40333,"date":"2022-07-27T12:21:56","date_gmt":"2022-07-27T20:21:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=40333"},"modified":"2022-07-27T12:21:56","modified_gmt":"2022-07-27T20:21:56","slug":"us-pushers-of-war-with-china-find-canadian-allies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2022\/07\/27\/us-pushers-of-war-with-china-find-canadian-allies\/","title":{"rendered":"US Pushers of War With China Find Canadian Allies"},"content":{"rendered":"

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi\u2019s planned trip to Taiwan combined with the head of the US military Mark Milley recently calling the Chinese military "noticeably<\/a> more aggressive" has greatly ratcheted up tensions with the world\u2019s most populous nation. <\/p>\n

Major Canadian media and think tanks are pressing for this country to join the conflict. They have recently offered suggestions on how to "win<\/a> the new Cold War" with China (Globe and Mail<\/i>), called for promoting<\/a> Taiwanese independence (McDonald Laurier Institute) and accused the country of "committing<\/a> mass atrocity crimes and grave human rights violations against the Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims" (Toronto Star<\/i>).<\/i> Through endless stories in recent years about Chinese spying and technology theft, as well as influence over Canadian cultural and schooling initiatives, the dominant media has established the ideological terrain for conflict. Echoing "Russiagate" nonsense, last month former Conservative leader Erin O\u2019Toole even claimed his party lost "about<\/a> eight or nine seats" in the last election due to Chinese interference.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

On spurious security grounds, the Trudeau government recently conceded to US and media pressure to ban the world\u2019s largest 5G network provider, Huawei, from building its cutting-edge broadband in Canada. During a meeting with her US counterpart last month Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland raised the idea of "friend-shoring." If pursued seriously, this could lead to delinking economically from China and Russia. <\/p>\n

Concurrently, Canada and the US have been working together to combat Chinese dominance over rare earth minerals used to produce electric cars and other newer technologies. Earlier in the year, opposition politicians and the media demanded<\/a> Ottawa block a Chinese firm from purchasing lithium deposits a Canadian company controlled in northwestern Argentina. How dare the Chinese take our Argentinian resources! <\/p>\n

With US military bases and warships encircling the Asian nation, Canadian vessels and aircraft are increasingly present near China\u2019s territorial waters and airspace. Four Canadian<\/a> naval vessels are participating in the Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC), a massive month-long US-led training that largely takes place off of Hawaii. The wargames partly target China. <\/p>\n

Alongside their US counterparts, Canadian vessels have run provocative maneuvers in the South China Sea. While they claim to be upholding the "international rules-based order" in these missions, the USA refuses to recognize the Law of the Sea. <\/p>\n

In early June it was reported that Chinese jets had repeatedly buzzed Canada\u2019s CP-140 Aurora surveillance plane operating near its territory. A Global News story \u2013 likely instigated by Canada\u2019s military \u2013 claimed Chinese pilots flew so close to "sometimes<\/a> see them raising their middle fingers." (Flipping the bird is not a common Chinese cultural practice.) Probably hoping to prod a (somewhat) reluctant Trudeau government to condemn the Chinese, the military got what they wanted. Asked about Chinese aggressiveness towards Canadian forces 8,000 km from their territory, Prime Minister Trudeau told reporters, "the fact<\/a> that China would have chosen to do this is extremely troubling, so we will be bringing it up directly with Chinese officials and (government) counterparts and ensuring that this doesn\u2019t continue to be part of an escalatory pattern." <\/p>\n

At the NATO summit in Spain last month the alliance released a new strategic concept that for the first-time listed China. It labeled Beijing a challenge to the alliance\u2019s "interests<\/a>, security and values." NATO\u2019s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg declared, "China<\/a> is substantially building up its military forces, including nuclear weapons, bullying its neighbors, threatening Taiwan \u2026 monitoring and controlling its own citizens through advanced technology, and spreading Russian lies and disinformation\u2026 China is not our adversary, but we must be clear-eyed about the serious challenges it represents." <\/p>\n

At a time when international cooperation is essential to mitigate the climate crisis and global health threats, a sizable segment of Canada\u2019s ruling elite is stoking conflict with China. <\/p>\n

Could Canada actually follow the US into war with China? <\/p>\n

Yves Engler’s latest book is<\/i> Stand on Guard for Whom?<\/a>: A People’s History of the Canadian Military. <\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi\u2019s planned trip to Taiwan combined with the head of the US military Mark Milley recently calling the Chinese military "noticeably more aggressive" has greatly ratcheted up tensions with the world\u2019s most populous nation. Major Canadian media and think tanks are pressing for this country to join the conflict. They have recently […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":244,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-40333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/244"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40333"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40333\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40336,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40333\/revisions\/40336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40333"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=40333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}