{"id":40971,"date":"2022-10-24T05:49:31","date_gmt":"2022-10-24T13:49:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=40971"},"modified":"2022-10-24T05:49:31","modified_gmt":"2022-10-24T13:49:31","slug":"contra-hobbes-peace-and-political-government-are-opposites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2022\/10\/24\/contra-hobbes-peace-and-political-government-are-opposites\/","title":{"rendered":"Contra Hobbes: Peace and Political Government Are Opposites"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_40975\" style=\"width: 522px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-40975\" src=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/512px-Drawing_of_frontispiece_of_Leviathan.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"512\" height=\"387\" class=\"size-full wp-image-40975\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/512px-Drawing_of_frontispiece_of_Leviathan-300x227.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/512px-Drawing_of_frontispiece_of_Leviathan.jpg 512w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 512px) 100vw, 512px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-40975\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><i>Drawing of frontispiece of Thomas Hobbes\u2019s Leviathan. Public domain.<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n<p>&#8220;Hereby it is manifest,&#8221; Thomas Hobbes wrote in 1651&#8217;s Leviathan, &#8220;that during the time men live without a common Power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called War; and such a war as is of every man against every man.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Hobbes&#8217;s solution to the absence of a &#8220;common Power&#8221; was a &#8220;covenant&#8221; with a &#8220;sovereign&#8221; who would act on behalf of all &#8211; what we today call &#8220;the state&#8221; or &#8220;government&#8221; &#8211; thus bringing an end to the terrible war he discerned.<\/p>\n<p>So, how well has that worked out for us?<\/p>\n<p>Hobbes wrote in the shadow of the Thirty Years&#8217; War, concluded by the Peace of Westphalia, which created the state as we know it. Casualties in that war are estimated at eight million.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Here are some death tolls for a select few of Earth&#8217;s near-constant wars since the consolidation of the Westphalian nation-state model in the late 19th century with the unifications of Germany and Italy, and subsequent struggles between\/within nation-states:<\/p>\n<p>World War One: 40 million<br \/> Russian Civil War: 9 million<br \/> Chinese Civil War: 11.6 million<br \/> Second Sino-Japanese War: 25 million<br \/> World War Two: 85 million<br \/> Korean War. 4.5 million<br \/> Vietnam War: 4.3 million<br \/> Nigerian Civil War: 3 million<br \/> Afghanistan Conflict: 2 million<br \/> Second Congo War: 5.4 million<\/p>\n<p>The verdict was certainly in by 1918, when Randolph Bourne died and his essay &#8220;The State&#8221; was published posthumously. The takeaway line: &#8220;War is the health of the state.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Hobbes&#8217;s &#8220;sovereign&#8221; suggestion, as taken, didn&#8217;t end war. It put war on steroids.<\/p>\n<p>Political government as we&#8217;ve constructed it is geared toward maximizing death to increase its own power and expand its own reach at the expense of everyone. We&#8217;ve still got perpetual war of every man against every man. Only now it&#8217;s highly organized, well-funded, and waged for the benefit of the political class.<\/p>\n<p>As Leon Trotsky &#8211; a &#8220;state-ist&#8221; himself, but one who hoped for a &#8220;withering away&#8221; of political government into communism &#8211; put it in 1937&#8217;s The Revolution Betrayed:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Whatever be the programs of the government, stateism inevitably leads to a transfer of the damages of the decaying system from strong shoulders to weak. &#8230; State-ism means applying brakes to the development of technique, supporting unviable enterprises, perpetuating parasitic social strata.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What private commercial interest, operating under a weak state or no state at all, would have invented the tank, the aerial bomb, or the nuclear warhead? Such weapons only promise profitability in the context of a strong, powerful states waging war with each other.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m often told that my anarchist philosophy and my goal of reaching, at least, a &#8220;panarchy&#8221; under which each individual chooses a governing entity instead of remaining trapped in the Westphalian Model&#8217;s geographic &#8220;sovereignty&#8221; trap, are unrealistic fantasies worthy only of dismissal.<\/p>\n<p>But if unrealism is a disqualifying factor, Hobbes&#8217;s &#8220;sovereign&#8221; and the state as we know have, unlike my ideas, had their chance &#8230; and are clearly failures when it comes to ending war.<\/p>\n<p>As we stare down the barrel of nuclear holocaust, it&#8217;s clearly time to re-think how we do government.<\/p>\n<p><i>Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the <a href=\"http:\/\/thegarrisoncenter.org\/\">William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism<\/a>. He lives and works in north central Florida. <\/i><i>This article is reprinted with permission from William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Hereby it is manifest,&#8221; Thomas Hobbes wrote in 1651&#8217;s Leviathan, &#8220;that during the time men live without a common Power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called War; and such a war as is of every man against every man.&#8221; Hobbes&#8217;s solution to the absence of a &#8220;common [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-40971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40971"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40971\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40973,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40971\/revisions\/40973"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40971"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=40971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}