{"id":4206,"date":"2008-02-26T12:52:21","date_gmt":"2008-02-26T19:52:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/26\/donna-brazile-catches-on-to-fdd\/"},"modified":"2008-02-26T12:52:21","modified_gmt":"2008-02-26T19:52:21","slug":"donna-brazile-catches-on-to-fdd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/26\/donna-brazile-catches-on-to-fdd\/","title":{"rendered":"Donna Brazile Catches On to FDD"},"content":{"rendered":"

It took more than six years, but at least one Democrat enlisted after 9\/11 by the hard-line neo-conservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) seems finally to have caught on to the fact that its agenda is something other than what its name suggests. In a statement released by her office Monday, Democratic consultant and frequent television political commentator Donna Brazile \u00e2\u20ac\u0153strongly condemn[ed]\u00e2\u20ac\u009d what she called a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153misleading and reckless ad campaign<\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d undertaken against 17 Democratic lawmakers by the FDD for their opposition to the Protect America Act and resigned from its Board of Advisers.<\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153The organization is using fear mongering for political purposes and worse, their scare tactics have the effect of emboldening terrorists and our enemies abroad by asserting our intelligence agencies are failing to do their job. I am deeply disappointed they would use my name since no one has consulted me about the activities of the group in years.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Of course, fear-mongering is exactly FDD\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s stock in trade, as it has been from the very beginning, something of which Brazile unfortunately appears to unaware, claiming, as she does, that, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153due to the influence of their funders, in the last few years, FDD has morphed into a radical right wing organization that is doing the dirty work for the Bush administration and Congressional Republicans.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d If she had been paying attention, she would have seen from the moment she signed on that FDD\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s messages \u00e2\u20ac\u201d particularly concerning virtually anything from the Arab or Islamic worlds \u00e2\u20ac\u201d were designed to create fear, starting with the TV ad<\/a> that ran in 2002 which clearly sought to confuse the viewer into believing that somehow Yasser Arafat, Saddam Hussein, and Osama bin Laden were all part of the same threat. Indeed, FDD, the best profile<\/a> for which is found on Right Web, has acted primarily as a front for the Likudist founders of the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC), the same group that is also behind the Freedom\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Watch<\/a> about which I have posted here<\/a> and here<\/a>. Cliff May, FDD\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s president since its founding Sep 13, 2001, served previously as RJC\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vice chair.<\/p>\n

Might Brazile\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s resignation prompt other self-identified Democrats, such as certified Friend of Bill (FOB) former Amb. Marc Ginsberg or Amb. Max Kampelman or Rep. Eliot Engel, to reconsider their own association with FDD (which, incidentally, also sponsors the Committee on the Present Danger<\/a>)? (I won\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even mention the possibility that \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Distinguished Advisors\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Sen. Joseph Lieberman or James Woolsey might want to disassociate themselves, let alone Zell Miller.) How about Republicans who might be somewhat less partisan or less Likudnik in their policy preferences, like Jack Kemp, one of the two surviving members of FDD\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s board of directors? (The other two are Steve Forbes and the late Jeane Kirkpatrick.) Or former Secretary of State George Shultz, who co-chairs the CPD along with Woolsey)? The full roster of FDD\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s many boards, staff members and associates \u00e2\u20ac\u201d already heavily weighted to the extreme right \u00e2\u20ac\u201d can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

What I found particularly intriguing about Brazile\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s statement \u00e2\u20ac\u201d other than her naivete about what FDD has been all along \u00e2\u20ac\u201d was her assertion that FDD \u00e2\u20ac\u0153would use my name since no one has consulted me about the activities of the group in years.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d One would think that an organization dedicated to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153defending democracies\u00e2\u20ac\u009d would try to keep its associates, let alone its leadership, informed of its activities. But apparently that has not been the case. Also intriguing is the fact that she blames the group\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s evolution on its the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153influence of (its) funders\u00e2\u20ac\u009d whose identities, however, she fails to disclose. In the interests of transparency \u00e2\u20ac\u201d which all can agree are essential for democracy \u00e2\u20ac\u201d perhaps the group will see fit to identify them. <\/p>\n

<\/a>Visit Lobelog.com<\/a> for the latest news analysis and commentary from Inter Press News Service’s Washington bureau chief Jim Lobe.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It took more than six years, but at least one Democrat enlisted after 9\/11 by the hard-line neo-conservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) seems finally to have caught on to the fact that its agenda is something other than what its name suggests. In a statement released by her office Monday, Democratic consultant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4206\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4206"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}