![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/oppen.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
News emerged yesterday, via the <\/a>Hollywood Reporter<\/a><\/em>, that a feature-length doc based on a book by my late friend Daniel Ellsberg is making progress, now with help from actress Kristin Stewart. The film, titled How to Stop a Nuclear War<\/em> and based on Dan\u2019s book Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner<\/em> (see my take below), was announced one year ago but still seeking backers via a new \u201csizzle reel.\u201d Emma Thompson will narrate and Paul Jay directs.<\/p>\n Stewart says in the new promo: \u201cWe\u2019ve grown so accustomed to the looming threat of nuclear annihilation, that it barely registers in our daily lives. But when some new crisis or close call startles out of our slumber for just a brief moment, we truly grasp the insanity of living on a hair trigger to what could be a real-life Armageddon.\u201d Stewart, you might say, has gone from \u201cTwilight\u201d to \u201cDoomsday.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Stewart\u2019s fianc\u00e9e, Dylan Meyer, is the daughter of Nicholas Meyer, the director of ABC\u2019s\u00a0groundbreaking 1983 TV movie\u00a0The Day After and an executive producer of the\u00a0How to Stop a Nuclear War documentary\u2026.Stewart, who will also appear in the eventual documentary, echoes Ellsberg in arguing the world is \u201cdangerously close to nuclear conflict, perhaps closer than we have been since the Cold War.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n In the sizzle reel sent to potential investors of the doc as the producers fill out the budget, Stewart praises the history-making whistleblower, who died in June 2023 at age 92. \u201c[Ellsberg\u2019s] insider knowledge of nuclear war planning informs the film\u2019s urgent call to action. This films sounds the alarm about this threat, but also shows the solutions and steps we can take to avert catastrophe,\u201d she adds.<\/em><\/p>\n Ellsberg famously made copies of the Pentagon Papers and other classified nuclear documents during the Nixon administration and leaked the documents to The\u00a0New York Times\u00a0and other media outlets in 1971. As a high-level Pentagon analyst, Ellsberg was charged by the U.S. with breaking the Espionage Act, but the case was dismissed because of government misconduct in evidence-gathering.<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cIf we don\u2019t address this [nuclear weapons] issue, nothing else we care about \u2014 no social justice or environmental causes or peaceful political resolutions, movies we make, people we love, the things we care about \u2014 don\u2019t matter anymore. They don\u2019t matter in a postapocalyptic wasteland,\u201d Stewart warns.<\/em><\/p>\n In a statement obtained earlier by The Hollywood Reporter,<\/em> Emma Thompson said she had been fearful of nuclear weapons in her youth and participated in protests against their use, and feels a need to get active again.<\/p>\n \u201cMaking the connection between the climate crisis movement and the anti-nuclear movement has never been more essential. Between us, we can \u2013 to quote Ellsberg \u2013 prevent this from happening. We have to start now, today and never stop until these weapons have been outlawed for the murderous evil that they are,\u201d Thompson said.<\/p>\n Below, a piece I wrote six years ago about Dan and his book, for Bill Moyers\u2019 site:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n Avoiding Doomsday For most people, Daniel Ellsberg is known mainly for \u2014 or only for \u2014 the Pentagon Papers he leaked in 1971. And that\u2019s plenty. It set in motion a landmark First Amendment case and led to shifts in public opinion that helped quicken the US withdrawal from Vietnam and the end to that war. Ellsberg was back in the public eye recently in relation to the epic 10-part PBS series on Vietnam, which included a lengthy segment on the Pentagon Papers \u2014 but his absence from the series as an interview subject drew criticism.<\/p>\n But, for me, the name Ellsberg does not immediately evoke \u201cVietnam\u201d but rather \u201canti-nuclear.\u201d And now he has written a book titled The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner<\/a><\/em>, to be published by Bloomsbury in December. In it he reveals that the\u00a07,000 pages of the Pentagon Papers that he copied from his office at the Rand Corporation in 1969-70 were only \u201ca fraction\u201d of what he had borrowed from office safes. Much of the rest amounted to the \u201cother\u201d Pentagon papers \u2014 secret documents on US nuclear war plans and capabilities.<\/p>\n In Doomsday Machine<\/em> \u2014 the title taken, of course, from Dr. Strangelove<\/em> \u2014 he discloses that he intended to release all of these copies at the same time but became convinced that it was vital to first concentrate on a war already raging rather than on one that was even more deadly but not at hand (although the threat certainly was). His story of what happened to the nuclear papers is almost worth the price of the book, as they are hidden in a compost pile, then at a garbage dump, before the outer fringes of a hurricane scatter them to history. Ellsberg has since obtained some of them again via FOIA requests and other means.<\/p>\n While I wrote about the Pentagon Papers in the early 1970s, my close connection with Ellsberg began only in the 1980s after I became the editor of Nuclear Times<\/em> magazine. Ellsberg, then (and still) living in the San Francisco area, had started appearing at antinuclear protests \u2014 the \u201cfreeze\u201d campaign was in full swing across the country. Naturally I wanted him to write an essay for the magazine on this subject but I was warned that while he often tried to write articles he \u201cnever finishes them.\u201d When he completed a column for us, it drew wide attention as his first published piece in many years.<\/p>\n And so began our friendship. His anti-nuclear activism only increased, leading to his arrest at numerous protests, including at the Nevada test site, over the next decade. Most of the world still knew him only for the Papers, but he had become a hero in anti-nuclear circles. We had long talks, in person or over the phone, about nuclear issues and about Hiroshima, a subject I had written about for dozens of newspapers and magazines after my visit there in 1984. He took particular interest in the book I was writing with Robert Jay Lifton<\/a>, Hiroshima in America: Fifty Years of Denial<\/a><\/em>, and attended with me several of the annual gatherings at Lifton\u2019s summer home in Wellfleet, Massachusetts. At those retreats he would talk about his anti-nuclear civil disobedience and grow quite emotional discussing his little-known work on nuclear war plans that preceded his months in Vietnam in the mid-1960s. But he had not written widely about that.<\/p>\n In recent years, Ellsberg has been hailed by many and decried by some as \u201cthe world\u2019s most famous whistleblower,\u201d often interviewed for his early support for WikiLeaks, Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden. But his passion \u2014 and my own \u2014 surrounding nuclear threat has never faded. I wrote a book, Atomic Cover-Up<\/a><\/em>, on the US suppression of film footage from Hiroshima that he deeply appreciated.<\/p>\n In my current book, The Tunnels<\/a><\/em>, peak nuclear dangers during the Cold War play a key role as I cover escapes under the Berlin Wall and how the Kennedy White House tried to kill US television coverage of them. This happened in 1962, at a time when Ellsberg was intimately involved in nuclear theorizing and \u201cgame\u201d play. One reason JFK did not support tunnel escapes and publicity about them, was fear that it might spark a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets. He managed to scuttle Daniel Schorr\u2019s CBS coverage and delay an NBC primetime special, The Tunnel<\/em>, but when the latter finally aired it would stand as a landmark in TV history and profoundly influence a generation of broadcast journalists (including Bill Moyers).<\/p>\n So, for all these reasons, I was particularly pleased to read Ellsberg\u2019s upcoming The Doomsday Machine<\/em>, already hailed in blurbs by everyone from Edward Snowden to Arundhati Roy.<\/p>\n Ellsberg, now 86, wrote an autobiography<\/a> about 15 years ago, but this is his first book tracing his full encounter with nuclear weapons. It goes back to his teen years in the postwar 1940s when he read John Hersey\u2019s Hiroshima<\/a><\/em>, which would inform his nuclear views for the rest of his life. In the book, even though I thought I knew Dan well, I was surprised to read that he belatedly learned that his father, a builder, had top-secret clearances and refused to work on the hydrogen bomb project on principle \u2014 and cited Dan introducing him to the Hersey book as a turning point.<\/p>\n Part I of the book, making up about two-thirds of the pages, is titled \u201cThe Bomb and I,\u201d and kicks off with the chapter, \u201cHow Could I: The Making of a Nuclear War Planner.\u201d We follow his early career, which included stints in the US Marines and at Harvard, to Vietnam and to Rand, with nuclear risk always in the background, if not the foreground. I was surprised to learn that as an avowed Cold Warrior he had played a key role in drafting one of the key documents in my Tunnels<\/em> book, the official, step-by-step US war plan for initiating a first-strike nuclear attack. Then his book moves on to two subjects at the heart of my Tunnels<\/em>: the Berlin crisis and the Cuban missile showdown.<\/p>\n [N]o matter the president, from Truman and Ike to Obama and Trump, it has been American policy to launch a nuclear first-strike even if we have not yet been attacked.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n On Cuba he reveals in a straightforward fashion his intimate involvement as an adviser to White House insiders before and during the October 1962 episode. Ellsberg was in the \u201cdovish\u201d camp, advising those around Kennedy to first try blocking Soviet shipments to Cuba instead of following the Joint Chiefs\u2019 urgings to bomb and\/or invade the island. We all know the happy ending to that crisis, but in the following chapter Ellsberg covers what he, and the public, did not know at the time: the full extent of how close we came to World War III, not because of actions by Soviet or American leaders but the dangers posed by trigger-happy Cubans manning anti-aircraft batteries and Soviet officers in submarines. But, as in so much of the book, it\u2019s not merely \u201chistory\u201d but a warning for today with many of the same technological \u2014 and human \u2014 elements still holding sway.<\/p>\n In the final third of the book, Ellsberg goes beyond his personal experiences to tackle the track record and philosophy of what he calls \u201cbombing cities,\u201d \u201cburning cities\u201d and \u201ckilling a nation\u201d before concluding with the real driving force of this book, and why it\u2019s so significant today: a close study of US \u201cfirst-use\u201d policy. Yes, no matter the president, from Truman and Ike to Obama and Trump, it has been American policy to launch a nuclear first-strike even if we have not yet been attacked.<\/p>\n It is Ellsberg\u2019s belief that multiple presidents have used nuclear weapons in threatening other nations since Nagasaki. He presents a long list of such moments, and along with many, he is particularly worried about Trump\u2019s recklessness toward North Korea. He recalls Trump asking an adviser about nuclear weapons, \u201cIf we have them, why can\u2019t we use them?\u201d Trump also wondered if our allies, Japan and South Korea, should consider designing their own nukes.<\/p>\n But he also argues that accidental nuclear war is a real threat, and that the final decision to fire weapons may be delegated to subordinates in the US and Russia and probably in other nuclear nations. Vital information about all things nuclear, meanwhile, has been kept from the public for decades: \u201cLike discussion of covert operations and assassination plots, nuclear war plans and threats are taboo for public discussion by the small minority of officials and consultants who know anything about them.\u201d Few in Congress even know much about them.<\/p>\n This \u201csystematic official secrecy, lying and obfuscation\u201d guarantees that \u201cmost aspects of the\u00a0US nuclear planning system and force readiness that became known to me half a century ago still exist today\u201d and are \u201cas prone to catastrophe as ever.\u201d Ellsberg calls this \u201cthe hidden reality\u201d he hopes to expose in his book \u2014 and in my view, he succeeds at that.<\/p>\n At a time when nuclear dangers grow, along with activism to combat them \u2014 elevated just this week by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons receiving the Nobel Peace Prize \u2014 Ellsberg\u2019s book is a timely reminder of the nuclear threat and essential reading in the Trump era.<\/p>\n Note<\/strong><\/em>: My film Atomic Cover-up<\/em> can we watched by everyone now at the PBS site and all PBS apps<\/a>. The companion book of the same title is available here<\/a>. <\/strong><\/p>\n Thanks for reading Oppenheimer and the Legacy of His Bomb ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/strong>November, 2017<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/substackcdn.com\/image\/fetch\/w_424,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep\/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F371a72e1-d325-4e9e-b352-3763c73d6236_420x638.jpeg "\\"\\"")
<\/picture>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n