{"id":45966,"date":"2024-02-13T12:30:10","date_gmt":"2024-02-13T20:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=45966"},"modified":"2024-02-13T12:30:10","modified_gmt":"2024-02-13T20:30:10","slug":"95-billion-for-more-weapons-and-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2024\/02\/13\/95-billion-for-more-weapons-and-war\/","title":{"rendered":"$95 Billion for More Weapons and War"},"content":{"rendered":"

Reprinted from Bracing Views<\/a> with the author\u2019s permission.<\/i><\/p>\n

The U.S. Senate has worked tirelessly to pass a bill for $95 billion<\/a> for more weapons and war. Surprise! Roughly $61 billion will go to Ukraine to continue that ghastly and largely stalemated war, $14 billion will go to Israel to facilitate the ongoing genocide in Gaza, roughly $9 billion will go to humanitarian aid, and roughly $5 billion will go to Taiwan and other countries in the region to stir up trouble with China.<\/p>\n

Isn\u2019t it nice to know the U.S. Senate has our backs? That senators have heard the cry of the American working classes and are going to help them by shipping more weapons overseas for more war?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/picture><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Just think: Another $14 billion to Israel to produce more scenes like this in Gaza<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

I had to laugh when I saw this assertion<\/a> from Heather Cox Richardson: \u201cThe fight over U.S. aid to Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, and the other countries with which we have made partnerships is not about saving money \u2013 most of the funds for Ukraine are actually spent in the U.S.\u201d Yes! It\u2019s not about \u201csaving money\u201d! After all, most of the money will go to major weapons contractors, America\u2019s merchants of death. So pay no attention to this, peasant. You\u2019re getting a bargain.<\/p>\n

In her article, Richardson mentions Dwight D. Eisenhower and the year he took office as president, 1953, which made me think of these famous words<\/a> said by Ike in 1953:<\/p>\n

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children… This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.<\/em><\/p>\n

Richardson is having none of this. The Senate\u2019s $95 billion is not \u201ca theft from those who hunger and are not fed,\u201d but rather a wise investment that will pay dividends \u2013 as it will, for America\u2019s vast military-industrial-congressional complex (MICC).<\/p>\n

Fortunately, it appears the Senate\u2019s $95 billion handout to the MICC (remember: don\u2019t worry about saving money here!) is unlikely to survive the House of Representatives. Still, it is indicative of the total moral bankruptcy of the U.S. Senate and its supine obedience to the weapons makers.<\/p>\n

Video bonus: Here I am, talking about the military-industrial complex<\/a>, trying to channel a tiny bit of Ike and his wisdom. The video is courtesy of the Merchants of Death Tribunal.<\/p>\n

William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools. He writes at Bracing Views<\/a>. <\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reprinted from Bracing Views with the author\u2019s permission. The U.S. Senate has worked tirelessly to pass a bill for $95 billion for more weapons and war. Surprise! Roughly $61 billion will go to Ukraine to continue that ghastly and largely stalemated war, $14 billion will go to Israel to facilitate the ongoing genocide in Gaza, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":290,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-45966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"The U.S. Senate Once Again Serves the Military-Industrial Complex"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/290"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45966"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45973,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45966\/revisions\/45973"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45966"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=45966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}