{"id":47069,"date":"2024-04-15T12:55:18","date_gmt":"2024-04-15T20:55:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=47069"},"modified":"2024-04-15T12:55:18","modified_gmt":"2024-04-15T20:55:18","slug":"lockstep-us-support-fuels-conflict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2024\/04\/15\/lockstep-us-support-fuels-conflict\/","title":{"rendered":"Lockstep US Support Fuels Conflict"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Iranian retaliation in response to Israel\u2019s April 1 attack on their consulate in Damascus was unprecedented. It was the first direct attack on Israeli territory from Iran, and it was reportedly the largest drone attack on record.<\/p>\n<p>The attack was also one of the most telegraphed military responses of all time. After almost two weeks of warnings that a response was coming, the Iranian government <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thenationalnews.com\/news\/mena\/2024\/04\/15\/iran-says-it-gave-neighbours-72-hours-notice-before-its-attack-on-israel\/\" rel=\"\">gave<\/a> advance warning to Turkey, Jordan, and Iraq several days before the attack, and they gave Israel, the U.S. and other regional states hours to prepare. Tehran wanted to make a point without doing so much damage that it would be guaranteed to trigger a wider conflict. The response could easily have been worse and more destructive than it was.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The Biden administration is reportedly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/2024\/04\/14\/biden-netanyahu-israel-iran\/\" rel=\"\">urging<\/a> Israel not to escalate things further, but it is questionable whether Netanyahu will follow the U.S. lead on this when he has ignored Biden so many other times. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.economist.com\/middle-east-and-africa\/2024\/04\/13\/iran-attacks-israel-risking-a-full-blown-regional-war\" rel=\"\">The Economist<\/a>, \u201cIsrael has already informed the Americans and governments in the region that its response is inevitable.\u201d If Israel launches more attacks on Iranian targets, the conflict that they started will likely spread and get out of control. U.S. indulgence and Israeli recklessness created this mess, and continued U.S. backing could encourage Netanyahu to take even more risks.<\/p>\n<p>Netanyahu might gamble that he can push his luck, plunge the region into a larger war, and the U.S. will still come to the rescue out of a misguided sense of obligation. Biden has given him every reason to think that there is nothing he can do that will put U.S. support at risk, and as long as he can hide behind U.S. protection Netanyahu could become even more reckless. Biden\u2019s \u201cironclad\u201d commitment encourages the worst in a very bad client government.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/daniellarison.substack.com\/p\/lockstep-us-support-fuels-conflict\"><b>Read the rest of the article at Eunomia<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p><i>Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at <a href=\"https:\/\/daniellarison.substack.com\">Eunomia<\/a>. He is former senior editor at<\/i> The American Conservative<i>. He has been published in the<\/i> New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene<i>, and<\/i> Culture11, <i>and was a columnist for<\/i> The Week<i>. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DanielLarison\">Twitter<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Iranian retaliation in response to Israel\u2019s April 1 attack on their consulate in Damascus was unprecedented. It was the first direct attack on Israeli territory from Iran, and it was reportedly the largest drone attack on record. The attack was also one of the most telegraphed military responses of all time. After almost two [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-47069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"Biden\u2019s \u201cironclad\u201d commitment encourages the worst in a very bad client government."},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47069"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47093,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47069\/revisions\/47093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47069"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=47069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}