{"id":47800,"date":"2024-05-23T11:07:01","date_gmt":"2024-05-23T19:07:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=47800"},"modified":"2024-05-23T11:49:48","modified_gmt":"2024-05-23T19:49:48","slug":"us-house-committee-proposes-automatic-sign-up-for-military-draft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2024\/05\/23\/us-house-committee-proposes-automatic-sign-up-for-military-draft\/","title":{"rendered":"US House Committee Proposes ‘Automatic’ Sign-Up for Military Draft"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Wednesday, during markup<\/a> of the National Defense Authorization Act<\/a> (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025, the U.S. House Armed Services Committee approved an amendment to the NDAA<\/a> that would automatically<\/strong> register all draft-aged male U.S. residents with the Selective Service System for a possible military draft<\/a>, based on information from other Federal databases.<\/p>\n

This system of automatic draft registration would replace the system in effect since 1980<\/a> in which young men can decide for themselves<\/a> whether or not to sign up for the draft \u2013 and so many choose not to register<\/a> that the Selective Service database would be useless<\/a> for an actual draft.<\/p>\n

The automatic draft registration proposal<\/a> was instigated by the Selective Service System as part of its annual budget request to Congress, introduced in the HASC by Rep. Chrissy Houlahan<\/a> (D-PA), \u201cwholeheartedly\u201d endorsed by HASC Chair Mike Rogers (R-AL), and approved by voice vote of the full committee<\/a> without audible opposition.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Rep. Houlahan had been one of the leading proponents of proposals in previous years<\/a> to expand draft registration to women<\/a> as well as men. Her latest proposal for automatic registration of men only for a military draft indicates that she is more deeply committed to militarization than to any purported feminism<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The provisions for automatic draft registration are now included in the version of the NDAA that will go to the House floor. The NDAA is a \u201cmust-pass\u201d bill, so these provisions are likely to remain in the version of the NDAA adopted later this year by the full House unless some House member introduces, and the full House agrees to vote on and approves, a floor amendment to remove them. It remains to be seen whether a similar provision will be included in the Senate version of the NDAA, although we fear that this may be likely.<\/p>\n

The proposal for automatic draft registration makes it urgently important to find House and Senate sponsors to reintroduce<\/a> the Selective Service Repeal Act<\/a>, which had bipartisan sponsorship<\/a> in both the House<\/a> and Senate<\/a> in 2021-2022 but never got a hearing<\/a> in either the House<\/a> or Senate<\/a> Armed Services Committee, much less a floor vote<\/a> in either chamber of Congress.<\/p>\n

The proposal that was added to the House version of the NDAA<\/a> would authorize the Selective Service System (SSS) to issue regulations requiring any Federal agency to hand over any information in Federal records \u201cnecessary to identify or register a person subject to registration\u201d with the SSS, and to register them without their participation or consent. The SSS would also be authorized to issue regulations requiring individuals to provide information directly to the SSS, perhaps to cover instances in which individuals could be identified from other Federal records as subject to a military draft, but not with enough information \u2013 such as a current address \u2013 to register or draft them.<\/p>\n

The proposal would also create a legal basis that could be used in the future for involuntary automatic registration of individuals subject to a special-skills military draft, such as for activation of the Health Care Personnel Delivery System<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cAutomatic\u201d registration for a military draft would be complex, difficult, and in some cases impossible. Whether a draft-age individual is required to register with the SSS depends<\/a> on both their sex as assigned at birth and, if they aren\u2019t a U.S. citizen<\/a>, their immigration and visa status. Undocumented immigrants are supposed to register with the SSS, but foreign students and H-1 visa holders, many of whom are of draft age and who often live in the USA, legally, for years, are considered temporary \u201cnonimmigrant\u201d U.S. residents. As such, they aren\u2019t required or allowed to register with the SSS, or subject to a draft, under current law.<\/p>\n

As with state motor vehicle agencies<\/a> trying to determine which applicants for driver\u2019s licenses are required to register with the SSS<\/a> and which aren\u2019t, the SSS would need to obtain \u2013 either from other agencies or directly from prospective draftees \u2013 immigration, visa, and birth information. But birth records are generally state and local, not Federal records, and sex as assigned at birth is not necessarily included in any<\/em> Federal record.<\/p>\n

Any applicant for a U.S. passports can now self-select the gender marker<\/a> (\u201cM\u201d, \u201cF\u201d or X\u201d) they want on their passport, without regard for their sex as assigned at birth. Similarly, an individual can now self-select the gender marker<\/a> (again, \u201cM\u201d, \u201cF\u201d or X\u201d) to be recorded in their Social Security account.<\/p>\n

Automatic draft registration is likely to lead to automatic mis-registration of individuals who aren\u2019t eligible to be drafted, rendering the SSS database even less accurate or useful<\/a> for an actual draft. Automatic registration of all draft-age U.S. residents, without regard for visa or immigration status or sex as assigned at birth, would add hundreds of thousands of draft-ineligible foreign students, H-1 visa holders, and trans and non-binary individuals who weren\u2019t assigned male at birth (including, presumably, anyone who chooses a non-gendered \u201cX\u201d passport and Social Security account record, regardless of their sex as assigned at birth) to the registration list that would be used to generate induction orders of a draft were activated.<\/p>\n

Automatic draft registration won\u2019t make administering a draft easier, more effective, or more fair.<\/p>\n

The reason warmongers want to switch from self-registration to involuntary and automatic registration isn\u2019t to make a draft easier or even to make draft resistance<\/a> harder. What they want is to make young people\u2019s<\/a> opposition to being drafted \u2013 currently manifested mostly through noncompliance<\/a> with draft registration \u2013 less visible<\/strong>. That makes it all the more important for opponents of military conscription to educate, agitate, organize, and speak out<\/a> now<\/strong> against planning and preparation for any type of draft.<\/p>\n

Also yesterday, the California Senate<\/a> voted 23-2, with one Republican and one Democrat voting \u201cno\u201d and 15 Senators not voting, to approve a bill<\/a> to \u201cautomatically register draft-age male applicants for California driver\u2019s licenses with the Selective Service System\u201d. The bill, SB-1081, now goes to the California Assembly. (The alert in yesterday\u2019s blog post to send messages to California Senators was deactivated after the Senate vote. I apologize for any confusion.) Californians should tell their representatives in the state Assembly to oppose SB-1081. But if the proposal for national automatic draft registration is adopted by Congress, it would render state laws like this<\/a> intended to boost Selective Service registration largely moot.<\/p>\n

Tell Congress to repeal the Military Selective Service Act and abolish the Selective Service System<\/a> entirely.<\/p>\n

Edward Hasbrouck maintains the <\/em>Resisters.info<\/em><\/a> website and publishes the <\/em>\u201cResistance News\u201d newsletter<\/em><\/a>. He was <\/em>imprisoned in 1983-1984<\/em><\/a> for organizing resistance to draft registration.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Wednesday, during markup of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025, the U.S. House Armed Services Committee approved an amendment to the NDAA that would automatically register all draft-aged male U.S. residents with the Selective Service System for a possible military draft, based on information from other Federal databases. This system […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":367,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-47800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/367"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47800"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47800\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47806,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47800\/revisions\/47806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47800"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=47800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}