{"id":4959,"date":"2008-11-25T11:57:53","date_gmt":"2008-11-25T19:57:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=4959"},"modified":"2008-11-25T12:50:26","modified_gmt":"2008-11-25T20:50:26","slug":"medvedevs-tough-guy-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2008\/11\/25\/medvedevs-tough-guy-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Medvedev&#8217;s &#8216;Tough Guy Act&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2008\/11\/24\/world\/main4631526.shtml?tag=topStory;topStoryHeadline\">According to CBS<\/a>, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev&#8217;s first six months in office have contradicted the &#8220;liberal&#8221; reputation he (apparently) had when he was first elected. Maybe it&#8217;s a shock to some that one can be &#8220;soft spoken&#8221; and never have been a KGB spook and yet still, as president, look out of the interests of one&#8217;s country. But the examples given for Medvedev&#8217;s alleged illiberalism don&#8217;t hold water.<\/p>\n<p>Opposition to missile defense? Nearly everyone with a clue is opposed to the US basing a missile defense system, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.military.com\/opinion\/0,15202,179517,00.html\">especially one that does not even work<\/a>, in Poland and the Czech Republic. Being a liberal in either the contemporary American or the classical sense doesn&#8217;t preclude opposing US imperial ambitions, anyhow.<\/p>\n<p>Criticizing the US financial system? Hasn&#8217;t everyone all the way up to our <em>own<\/em> president done so by now? Economists have been warning of a collapse for years and <a href=\"http:\/\/mises.org\/tradcycl.asp\">classical liberals have been warning about bubbles<\/a> since before anyone alive on this planet was born. This is hardly a &#8220;continu[ation]&#8221; of &#8220;Cold War rhetoric&#8221; on Medvedev&#8217;s part.<\/p>\n<p>Georgia. Please. I think any journalist who would like to remain credible at this point should just recognize that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/11\/07\/world\/europe\/07georgia.html?_r=1\">Georgia did indeed begin the August conflict<\/a>, and not desperately reach for something, anything with which to bludgeon Russia &#8212; even for filler in a weak hit piece. Really, if all you have is that Russia &#8220;used excessive force against Georgia&#8221; &#8212; not at all an objectively measurable statement &#8212; you simply must shut up.<\/p>\n<p>And then, oh no! <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2008\/11\/25\/world\/main4632489.shtml\">Russia sends a warship to Venezuela<\/a>. Somehow, the completely insignificant country of Venezuela has become the boogeyman not just of the right wing, but of the mainstream as well. You don&#8217;t have to be a fan of that Ch\u00c3\u00a1vez clown to be confused by all the wasted breath over a government with no choice but to sell Bush&#8217;s America its oil. That Russia wants to add a little luster to its rusty, crumbled image does not make Medvedev suddenly anti-liberal.<\/p>\n<p>No, it&#8217;s not Medvedev&#8217;s image as a liberal that is in doubt &#8212; if it ever existed. It&#8217;s CBS&#8217;s as a significant source of original journalism. This frivolous, vacuous bit of tripe doesn&#8217;t belong on a news page. For more sophisticated analysis of Russia and its foreign (and domestic) policy, I suggest <a href=\"http:\/\/exile.ru\/articles\/list.php?IBLOCK_ID=35&#038;SECTION_ID=156\">War Nerd<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to CBS, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev&#8217;s first six months in office have contradicted the &#8220;liberal&#8221; reputation he (apparently) had when he was first elected. Maybe it&#8217;s a shock to some that one can be &#8220;soft spoken&#8221; and never have been a KGB spook and yet still, as president, look out of the interests of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[87,27,132,26,55],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cold-war","category-georgia","category-missile-defense","category-russia","category-venezuela"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4959"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4959\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4964,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4959\/revisions\/4964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4959"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}