{"id":50663,"date":"2024-12-23T09:44:58","date_gmt":"2024-12-23T17:44:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=50663"},"modified":"2024-12-23T09:44:58","modified_gmt":"2024-12-23T17:44:58","slug":"panama-and-trumps-throwback-imperialism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2024\/12\/23\/panama-and-trumps-throwback-imperialism\/","title":{"rendered":"Panama and Trump’s Throwback Imperialism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Trump threatened<\/a> to steal another country\u2019s land again:<\/p>\n

Trump reiterated his intentions to take back the Panama Canal, after threatening he would in a Truth Social post on Saturday. Trump said that the United States is being \u201cripped off\u201d at the Panama Canal and has insinuated that China is gaining influence over the waterway. \u201cWe\u2019re being ripped off at the Panama Canal like we\u2019re being ripped off everywhere else,\u201d Trump said Sunday.<\/em><\/p>\n

The fearmongering about China is a reminder of how pernicious defining U.S. foreign policy around great power rivalry can be. The threats against Panama show how Trump\u2019s crude imperialism<\/a> and the pursuit of rivalry with China reinforce each other.<\/a> Trump assumes that the U.S. is always being \u201cripped off,\u201d and he believes that the answer to this is to steal from other countries. If he thinks another country is getting too close to a rival, he wants the U.S. to \u201csolve\u201d that by threatening to steal some of their territory. Trump sees weaker countries in our hemisphere that he wants to dictate terms to, and rivalry with China provides him with the excuse for threatening them. He has probably been encouraged in this by his National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, who has been inflating<\/a> the Chinese \u201cthreat\u201d in Panama for years.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Like the most ridiculous revanchist, Trump is out there ranting about \u201ctaking back\u201d something that doesn\u2019t belong to the United States. As I said<\/a> last week, Trump likes to pick fights with weaker states. He often seems to do this simply for the sake of doing it and asserting dominance. The threats may end up being no more than bluster, but they still impose costs on the United States in our hemisphere. Other governments in the Americas will be less inclined to work with the U.S., and our country\u2019s reputation will take a hit throughout the region. Should Trump attempt to follow through on these threats, it would poison U.S. relations with many of our neighbors for years to come.<\/p>\n

Many hawks have long resented the return of the Panama Canal to Panamanian control, but until now they have never had a president quite reckless and stupid enough to talk about reversing it. If it seems far-fetched that Trump would terminate major treaties on the advice of hardliners, don\u2019t forget that he nixed the successful and valuable INF Treaty during his first term. If he chose to tear up the treaties with Panama, there wouldn\u2019t be much to stop him from doing it.<\/p>\n

It should go without saying that the Canal and the surrounding territory rightfully belong to Panama. The U.S. has no right to take it \u201cback,\u201d and threatening to do this is deranged. The Panamanian government has predictably rejected Trump\u2019s threats in the strongest terms:<\/p>\n

\u201cAs president, I want to clearly state that every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjoining zone is Panama\u2019s and will remain so,\u201d Mulino said Sunday. \u201cThe sovereignty and independence of our country is non-negotiable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia<\/a>. He is former senior editor at<\/i> The American Conservative. He has been published in the<\/i> New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and<\/i> Culture11, and was a columnist for<\/i> The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Trump threatened to steal another country\u2019s land again: Trump reiterated his intentions to take back the Panama Canal, after threatening he would in a Truth Social post on Saturday. Trump said that the United States is being \u201cripped off\u201d at the Panama Canal and has insinuated that China is gaining influence over the waterway. \u201cWe\u2019re […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[747],"class_list":["post-50663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"Trump is out there ranting about \u201ctaking back\u201d something that doesn\u2019t belong to the United States."},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50663"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50663\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50667,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50663\/revisions\/50667"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50663"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=50663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}