{"id":5105,"date":"2009-01-02T08:54:56","date_gmt":"2009-01-02T16:54:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=5105"},"modified":"2009-01-02T08:54:56","modified_gmt":"2009-01-02T16:54:56","slug":"heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2009\/01\/02\/heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails\/","title":{"rendered":"Heilbrunn Reviews Neo-Con Travails"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jacob Heilbrunn of <em>The National Interest<\/em>, which is related to the Nixon Center, has written two very interesting articles on the plight of the neo-cons after the Republican debacle in November that are well worth a read.<\/p>\n<p>The first, published on the journal\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s blog December 19, addresses the departure of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/1302.html\">Joshua Muravchik<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/1191.html\">Marc Reuel Gerecht<\/a>, as well as that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ips.org\/blog\/jimlobe\/?p=182\">reported earlier<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/1261.html\">Michael Ledeen<\/a>, from the foreign-policy ranks of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Like Ledeen, Gerecht has found a new home at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/1475.html\">Foundation for Defense of Democracies<\/a> (FDD), which, so far as I can tell, is basically a front for both Israel\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Likud Party and for the pro-Likud Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC). Muravchik, who, like Ledeen, had been associated with AEI for some 20 years, is apparently yet to find a new perch. Heilbrunn suggests that these departures are evidence of an ideological purge against neo-cons led by <a href=\"http:\/\/rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/3273.html\">Danielle Pletka<\/a>, who came to prominence as a staffer for the ultra-right Jesse Helms, but I find this a little difficult to believe if, for no other reason, than Pletka is as neo-conservative (and Likudist) as anyone I can think of. I understand from mutual friends that Muravchik had been worried about his position at AEI for at least the past year and a half due to withering pressure from above to write and publish more than he had. It is true as Heilbrunn points out, however, that Muravchik has been a bit more nuanced in his approach to the various \u00e2\u20ac\u0153evils\u00e2\u20ac\u009d that neo-cons have identified over the past two decades than some of his ideological colleagues; for example, <a href=\"http:\/\/rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/1316.html\">Daniel Pipes<\/a> (with whom Pletka has been close) has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.danielpipes.org\/blog\/2008\/05\/responding-to-joshua-muravchik-about.html\">attacked him<\/a> (and Gerecht) for entertaining the notion that the West should be willing to dialogue with and possibly even support non-violent Islamist parties in the Middle East, a notion that is anathema to Pipes. Perhaps AEI\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s or Pletka\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s aim is guided less by Republican loyalty than by Islamophobia, if indeed ideology \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and not personality, as was reportedly more the case with Ledeen \u00e2\u20ac\u201d is playing a role in these decisions.<\/p>\n<p>The second <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalinterest.org\/Article.aspx?id=20400\">article by Heilbrunn<\/a>, whose book, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/They-Knew-Were-Right-Neocons\/dp\/140007620X\/antiwarbookstore\">They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons<\/a><\/em> I <a href=\"http:\/\/domino.ips.org\/ips%5Ceng.nsf\/vwWebMainView\/FF21867A7EDD6D6DC12573DB00301AED\/?OpenDocument\">reviewed<\/a> last year, is much longer and appears in the latest issue (Jan 12) of <em>The American Conservative<\/em>. It speculates on the internal splits that the neo-cons are going through as a result of the political campaign and Obama\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s victory, and the possibility (I would say probability) that at least one major faction \u00e2\u20ac\u201d headed by people like Robert Kagan, David Brooks and even David Frum \u00e2\u20ac\u201d will seek to forge an alliance with liberal interventionists, presumably led by Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton (although Susan Rice also fits the bill), in the new administration, much as they succeeded in doing during the Clinton administration with respect to Balkans policy. As I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve written before, the two movements have similar historical origins (inspired in major part by the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153lessons\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00e2\u20ac\u201d \u00e2\u20ac\u0153never again\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00e2\u20ac\u201d they drew from Munich and the Holocaust) and tend to see foreign policy in highly moralistic terms in which the U.S. and Israel are \u00e2\u20ac\u0153exceptionally\u00e2\u20ac\u009d good. While I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t agree with everything in Heilbrunn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s analysis, it offers a good point of departure for watching the neo-cons as the Age of Obama gets underway.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jacob Heilbrunn of The National Interest, which is related to the Nixon Center, has written two very interesting articles on the plight of the neo-cons after the Republican debacle in November that are well worth a read. The first, published on the journal\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s blog December 19, addresses the departure of Joshua Muravchik and Marc Reuel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-5105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5105"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5105\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5106,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5105\/revisions\/5106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5105"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=5105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}