{"id":537,"date":"2004-03-09T20:05:08","date_gmt":"2004-03-10T03:05:08","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2004-03-09T20:05:08","modified_gmt":"2004-03-10T03:05:08","slug":"re-libertarian-purity-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2004\/03\/09\/re-libertarian-purity-test\/","title":{"rendered":"Re: Libertarian &#8216;Purity Test&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As mentioned <a href=http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/comments.php?id=P528_0_1_0>earlier<\/a>, the Web is abuzz with talk of the <a href=http:\/\/www.bcaplan.com\/cgi\/purity.cgi>Libertarian Purity Test<\/a>. Let&#8217;s forget the purity bit for a minute and talk about the ideas. My main gripe is that everyone seems to be posting scores instead of talking about specific areas of assent\/dissent, which might make this quiz a useful opening for debate. Upon reading that Julian Sanchez&#8211;who has <a href=http:\/\/www.reason.com\/hitandrun\/003986.shtml>defended consensual cannibalism<\/a>, for Pete&#8217;s sake!&#8211; scored a meager <a href=http:\/\/www.reason.com\/hitandrun\/004561.shtml#004561>79<\/a> (out of 160), Radley Balko hit a tepid <a href=http:\/\/www.theagitator.com\/archives\/010681.php#010681>98<\/a>, and so on, I began to wonder how people were answering specific questions. Of particular relevance to this blog are the following:<\/p>\n<p>(1 point questions&#8211;Are you more libertarian than, say, Bill Kristol?)<br \/>\n<i>25. Are you against national service?<br \/>\n26. Are you against the draft?<br \/>\n27. Does the U.S. intervene too much in other countries?<br \/>\n30. If it has to fight a war, should the U.S. try harder to avoid civilian targets?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>(3 point questions&#8211;More libertarian than Ronald Bailey?)<br \/>\n<i>49. Should the U.S. withdraw completely from Europe, Asia, and other foreign bases?<br \/>\n50. Is bombing civilians in an enemy country morally equivalent to murder?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Most of the 5 point questions are about one&#8217;s commitment to the broad goals of full-fledged anarchism, but even squishes should take a second look at #61:<\/p>\n<p><i>Is it morally permissible to exercise &#8220;vigilante justice,&#8221; even against government leaders?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>I would change the end to &#8220;especially against government leaders&#8221;&#8211;those who are most difficult to hold accountable for their crimes through official mechanisms&#8211; and ask this question again. If you say &#8220;no,&#8221; does that mean that the Iraqis had no right to overthrow Saddam Hussein but the U.S. government did? I guess it would go without saying, then, that, in addition to revolution, secession and all forms of conscientious objection (ie, crimes against the state) are also off the table. That&#8217;s some kind of libertarianism.  <\/p>\n<p>For some related thoughts of interest, see <a href=http:\/\/jessewalker.blogspot.com\/2004_03_07_jessewalker_archive.html#107880878385524987>this<\/a> by Jesse Walker.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As mentioned earlier, the Web is abuzz with talk of the Libertarian Purity Test. Let&#8217;s forget the purity bit for a minute and talk about the ideas. My main gripe is that everyone seems to be posting scores instead of talking about specific areas of assent\/dissent, which might make this quiz a useful opening for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=537"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/537\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=537"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}