{"id":56533,"date":"2025-12-10T20:07:54","date_gmt":"2025-12-11T04:07:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=56533"},"modified":"2025-12-10T20:08:20","modified_gmt":"2025-12-11T04:08:20","slug":"there-they-go-again-in-venezuela","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2025\/12\/10\/there-they-go-again-in-venezuela\/","title":{"rendered":"There They Go Again in Venezuela"},"content":{"rendered":"

Reprinted from Foreign Policy in Focus<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n

Mark Twain allegedly quipped, \u201cGod created war so Americans would learn geography.\u201d Whether or not he actually said that, it would be a good test \u2013 for the world\u2019s mightiest military power to be prevented from waging war if a majority of Americans failed to find the alleged enemy on a world map.<\/p>\n

This should not need to be said, but the United States has no legal authority to attack Venezuela (or Iran, Sudan, Somalia, or any other country). Nor does it have the legal right to engage in covert action to overthrow any government, including that of Venezuela. Should the United States do so, it will be opposed by everyone south of the Rio Grande, and it will rightly be seen as a racist resumption of the Monroe Doctrine. Whatever one thinks of the current government there, nearly 30 million people live in Venezuela, and they don\u2019t deserve to be demonized or threatened for the policies of their president, since Venezuela poses no threat to the United States.<\/p>\n

The American people get this. A recent CBS News poll <\/a>shows widespread public skepticism and disapproval of any U.S. military attack against Venezuela, properly so, with 70 percent opposing the United States taking military action.<\/p>\n

Moreover, the current U.S. military buildup in the Caribbean is an unnecessary and dangerous provocation. U.S. Navy warships and Marine deployments to the region should be reversed to ease tensions. The United States would not likely invade Venezuela with ground forces as even gung-ho-for-blood Secretary of War Pete Hegseth must know a quagmire would ensue, but the Trump administration may see political advantage to have this as a simmering, manufactured \u201ccrisis\u201d to distract from the Epstein files, Trump\u2019s sagging popularity, and his failed domestic and foreign policies. And Trump\u2019s declaration closing Venezuelan air space has zero legitimacy, though it did scare many airlines into changing flight routes.<\/p>\n

An obvious question: Is this really about oil, not drugs? Fentanyl is not coming into the United States via Venezuela, and the alleged drug ring run by Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro does not exist. However, Venezuela does have the world\u2019s largest known oil reserves.<\/p>\n

I can\u2019t imagine anyone wants a rerun of the Iraq wars. Let\u2019s not test the adage that \u201chistory may not repeat itself, but it does rhyme\u201d (which again, Mark Twain may or may not have said). We don\u2019t want to have to dust off our \u201cNo War for Oil!\u201d protest signs. And there is also already a metastasizing problem with violent competition for rare earth minerals in Venezuela.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

The brouhaha about the second attack on the alleged \u201cdrug boat\u201d<\/a> on September 2 possibly being a war crime misses the point, though Hegseth should be held to account. No evidence has been presented that it was a \u201cdrug boat\u201d and even if it was, there was no legal authority to attack it, once or twice. All the attacks on the alleged \u201cdrug boats\u201d are illegal, and unauthorized by Congress.<\/p>\n

Speaking of which, Congress needs to not only investigate these shady \u201cdrug boat\u201d attacks but assert its constitutional authority by passing a War Powers Resolution to stop the out-of-control Trump administration from further attacks or escalation. The U.S. Senate failed to pass<\/a> such a measure last month, 51-49, with all Democrats voting in favor and all but two Republicans voting against upholding the Constitution. The \u201cworld\u2019s greatest deliberative body\u201d should try again. Perhaps Republicans can read the polls better now.<\/p>\n

Also, U.S. economic sanctions are hurting the people and economy of Venezuela, and should be at least reconsidered, if not scrapped altogether. Unfortunately, some self-appointed foreign policy experts think sanctions are a humane alternative to war, and better than \u201cdoing nothing.\u201d In reality, broad economic sanctions hurt ordinary people the most, and are an immoral and ineffective way to try to get hungry people to overthrow their government, regardless of its domestic popularity or lack thereof.<\/p>\n

Lastly, wasn\u2019t Trump supposed to be about \u201cAmerica First\u201d and avoiding foreign wars? I never bought this, but Trump voters thought so. Trump is about to risk American lives, when nobody voted to have their sons and daughters fight a war with Venezuela, or any other country. Congress needs to listen to the wisdom of the American people and shut this ill-conceived threat to Venezuela and its neighbors down now.<\/p>\n

Kevin Martin, syndicated by <\/i>PeaceVoice<\/i><\/a>, is President of <\/i>Peace Action<\/i><\/a> Education Fund, the country\u2019s largest grassroots peace and disarmament organization with more than 200,000 supporters nationwide. <\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reprinted from Foreign Policy in Focus: Mark Twain allegedly quipped, \u201cGod created war so Americans would learn geography.\u201d Whether or not he actually said that, it would be a good test \u2013 for the world\u2019s mightiest military power to be prevented from waging war if a majority of Americans failed to find the alleged enemy […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":360,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[1093],"class_list":["post-56533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"0","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":"Trumping up a non-existent threat to menace a country most Americans couldn\u2019t find on a map"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/360"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56533"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56533\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56616,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56533\/revisions\/56616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56533"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=56533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}