{"id":57331,"date":"2026-01-25T18:13:33","date_gmt":"2026-01-26T02:13:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=57331"},"modified":"2026-01-25T18:13:33","modified_gmt":"2026-01-26T02:13:33","slug":"the-kyle-anzalone-show-is-pam-bondi-miriam-adelsons-tool-to-censor-americans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2026\/01\/25\/the-kyle-anzalone-show-is-pam-bondi-miriam-adelsons-tool-to-censor-americans\/","title":{"rendered":"The Kyle Anzalone Show: Is Pam Bondi Miriam Adelson\u2019s Tool to Censor Americans?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A letter about the Nobel Peace Prize. A claim that America needs \u201ccomplete and total control of Greenland.\u201d And a war that almost started, then didn\u2019t. We follow the thread from ego-driven spectacle to real-world consequences, unpacking how image-making can bend strategy and endanger lives.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Is Pam Bondi Miriam Adelson\u2019s Tool to Censor Americans ?\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/1r7NNB1w0tE\" width=\"1015\" height=\"571\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>We begin with the Greenland fixation and why it fails every basic test of strategy. Greenland is already protected under NATO via Denmark, and the specter of a Chinese or Russian occupation collapses under logistics and alliance math. So what\u2019s left? Legacy. The urge to redraw the map and be remembered becomes a risky compass when it steers policy toward symbolic victories over coherent national interest.<\/p>\n<p>From there, the focus shifts to Iran and a night when airspace closed, assets moved, and insiders braced for impact. The order never came. Not because escalation was unthinkable, but because defenses were thin and retaliation looked imminent. Reports point to Netanyahu\u2019s warning and U.S. readiness gaps as decisive. That\u2019s sobering: it implies delay, not de-escalation, while carriers, interceptors, and air wings redeploy. We also dig into Lindsey Graham\u2019s fury at Gulf allies who want to avoid turning their own bases and ports into targets\u2014a reminder that geography and self-preservation shape their decisions more than Washington talking points.<\/p>\n<p>Back home, we trace the money and the megaphone. Miriam Adelson\u2019s outsized influence, built on massive checks, highlights how single-issue loyalty can purchase foreign-policy outcomes. Pam Bondi\u2019s boasts about unprecedented DOJ actions on campus \u201canti-Semitism\u201d expose the dangerous slide from policing threats to policing dissent. When pro-Palestinian protest and criticism of U.S.-Israel policy are rebranded as bigotry, federal power becomes a cudgel against speech rather than a shield for it.<\/p>\n<p>We close with a regime change reality check. Dinesh D\u2019Souza\u2019s nostalgia for post-WWII \u201csuccess\u201d meets Dave Smith\u2019s rebuttal: those outcomes were born of total war, mass death, and decades of occupation\u2014conditions America will not, and should not, reproduce. Swapping in \u201cfriendlier thugs\u201d isn\u2019t strategy; it\u2019s a recipe for failed states, insurgency, and endless costs.<\/p>\n<p>If this breakdown helps you see the stakes more clearly, subscribe, share the show, and leave a review. What do you think is the biggest risk on the horizon: an Iran strike, a Greenland gambit, or the creeping crackdown on dissent?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A letter about the Nobel Peace Prize. A claim that America needs \u201ccomplete and total control of Greenland.\u201d And a war that almost started, then didn\u2019t. We follow the thread from ego-driven spectacle to real-world consequences, unpacking how image-making can bend strategy and endanger lives. We begin with the Greenland fixation and why it fails [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":436,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[746],"class_list":["post-57331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"0","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/436"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57331"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57334,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57331\/revisions\/57334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57331"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=57331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}