{"id":57807,"date":"2026-02-28T08:36:22","date_gmt":"2026-02-28T16:36:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=57807"},"modified":"2026-02-28T08:36:22","modified_gmt":"2026-02-28T16:36:22","slug":"the-kyle-anzalone-show-americans-dont-want-war-with-iran-us-officials-have-a-new-plan-to-manipulate-them","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2026\/02\/28\/the-kyle-anzalone-show-americans-dont-want-war-with-iran-us-officials-have-a-new-plan-to-manipulate-them\/","title":{"rendered":"The Kyle Anzalone Show: Americans Don\u2019t Want War with Iran &#8211; US Officials Have a New Plan to Manipulate Them"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A quiet leak says the loud part: some senior voices in Washington think the politics \u201cwork better\u201d if Israel strikes Iran first. Not because it changes the threat. Because it changes the story Americans hear. We pull that thread and walk through the actual mechanics of how a regional spark becomes a U.S. war\u2014and how the talking points are already scripted to sell it as defense, not regime change.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Americans Don\u2019t Want War with Iran - US Officials Have a New Plan to Manipulate Them\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/XJH5X4d2moA\" width=\"1076\" height=\"605\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>We dig into the Wall Street Journal\u2019s reporting on U.S. negotiating demands in Geneva: dismantle core facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan; ship out enriched uranium; accept permanent restrictions; get minimal sanctions relief. If the aim is nonproliferation, that package reads like a poison pill. We explain enrichment levels, IAEA safeguards, and why the JCPOA\u2019s sunsets never legalized weapons. We also explore practical off-ramps\u2014like diluting higher-enriched stock back to fuel-grade or transferring it to a third country\u2014and why domestic politics and sanctions architecture block viable outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>Then we zoom out to missiles, proxies, and red lines that Washington has outsourced to regional partners. That choice all but guarantees future friction and a pretext for strikes. On Capitol Hill, even narrow, monitored enrichment is attacked as \u201cJCPOA lite,\u201d while the constitutional question goes missing. If war is truly on the table, a clean declaration vote would force members to own the decision; a War Powers Resolution that can be vetoed only muddies accountability. We close by assessing costs that seldom make the headline\u2014U.S. casualties, humanitarian fallout, a deepening refugee crisis, and an empowered military-industrial complex\u2014while ordinary Americans shoulder the bill.<\/p>\n<p>If this conversation adds clarity, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with your take on whether Congress should be required to vote before any strike on Iran. Your voice shapes what happens next.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A quiet leak says the loud part: some senior voices in Washington think the politics \u201cwork better\u201d if Israel strikes Iran first. Not because it changes the threat. Because it changes the story Americans hear. We pull that thread and walk through the actual mechanics of how a regional spark becomes a U.S. war\u2014and how [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":436,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[746],"class_list":["post-57807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"0","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/436"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57807"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57807\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57811,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57807\/revisions\/57811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57807"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=57807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}