{"id":59651,"date":"2026-06-12T03:57:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:57:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=59651"},"modified":"2026-06-12T03:57:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:57:16","slug":"3-trillion-a-year-for-us-military-spending","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2026\/06\/12\/3-trillion-a-year-for-us-military-spending\/","title":{"rendered":"$3 Trillion a Year for US Military Spending"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Reprinted from <a href=\"https:\/\/worldbeyondwar.org\/3-trillion-a-year-for-u-s-military-spending\/\">World BEYOND War:<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Recently the least popular person alive <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/davidcnswanson\/status\/2063946054303707217\">said<\/a>, \u201cI didn\u2019t guarantee no war. Why would I have built the strongest military in the world?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Already unpopular with kind and decent people, Trump may have \u2014 with that comment \u2014 tanked his popularity with every weapons company public relations hack on Earth. Their most deeply held pretense has always been that military spending isn\u2019t needed for wars but rather to prevent wars.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, Trump promised not to start any wars and to end existing ones easily and swiftly. Of course, one of the many reasons not to have believed him was that he wanted ever higher military spending. Of course, military spending makes the use of a military more, not less, likely.<\/p>\n<p>But Trump\u2019s current push is supposedly to take his record-breaking trillion-dollar-a-year military budget and raise it to $1.5 trillion a year. This is a lie built on a falsehood wrapped in a Truth Social post.<\/p>\n<p>According to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pogo.org\/reports\/the-true-total-u-s-military-budget\">new report from POGO<\/a>, U.S. military spending is already $1.5 to $1.7 trillion per year, or \u2014 if you include (and why shouldn\u2019t you?) interest on debt for past military spending, $1.7 to $2.3 trillion per year. The variations among the five different calculations featured in the report have a lot to do with the complexity and obscurity of the U.S. government, including the variety of sources of government data that can be used. It takes serious research to dig the militarism out, as it\u2019s hidden everywhere. But the big-ticket items are things like \u201cHomeland Security\u201d and veterans\u2019 benefits and debt interest.<\/p>\n<p>The report gives us not the slightest hint at any reason to doubt the highest figure. If that $2.3 trillion per year is correct, and if Trump\u2019s servants on Capitol Hill add another $0.5 trillion just for kicks plus another $0.2 trillion specifically for destroying Iran and rebuilding the bases that Iran destroyed \u2014 and the pending destruction of which was the immediate excuse for the war \u2014 then we\u2019ll be at $3 trillion&#8230; and \u2014 barring the appearance of a spine in a significant number of members of Congress \u2014 another $3 trillion or more the next year and the next and the next.<\/p>\n<p>The military budget <a href=\"https:\/\/worldbeyondwar.org\/militarism-mapped?mapname=money&amp;subname=spendingMillionsSipri&amp;mmy=2025\">figures from SIPRI<\/a> are widely used, in part because SIPRI provides them for most nations on Earth so that one can do comparisons. But SIPRI has the U.S. at $0.95 trillion in 2025. The new report from POGO suggests that SIPRI\u2019s omission of veterans\u2019 benefits may be a bigger mistake for the United States (which has waged so many wars) than it would be for some other countries. The U.S. government also far outpaces the rest of the world\u2019s nations when it comes to debt. And less of other nations\u2019 smaller debts may be due to wars they haven\u2019t waged. So, possibly it is not completely outrageous to make a comparison between the real level of U.S. military spending and SIPRI\u2019s level of everybody else\u2019s military spending. (Note that SIPR has no 2025 data for Venezuela, Cuba, or North Korea.)<\/p>\n<p>In 2025, the entire non-U.S. world for which SIPRI has data spent $1.86 trillion on militaries. China spent $0.336 trillion, Russia $0.19 trillion, Iran $0.007 trillion. Meanwhile the U.S. was at $2.3 trillion, vastly more than the rest of the world combined, or over 4 times its three designated enemies combined. The U.S. and its allies and partners and weapons customers in 2025 (that is, every government except the three designated enemies) spent $3.63 trillion or almost 7 times the combined spending of the three designated enemies.<\/p>\n<p>The reason the U.S. government cannot win a war is not a lack of spending, but a lack of any coherent meaning to the concept of \u201cwinning a war.\u201d There is no amount of murder and destruction that persuades survivors to like or willingly obey you. There just isn\u2019t. The United States and world would be made vastly safer by spending less on war and more on actual aid, cooperation, the rule of law, disarmament, diplomacy, and unarmed civilian defense.<\/p>\n<p>We can assume that the whole world\u2019s military spending is going to keep increasing. The U.S. government has made badgering others into this a top priority. But if the U.S. military budget goes to $3 trillion, then even if the rest of the world hits $2 trillion, the U.S. government alone will be spending to kill on behalf of 4% of the world\u2019s population 150% of what the rest of the world spends to kill on behalf of 96% of the world\u2019s population. Per capita that would be $8,746 for wars from the U.S. government for every man, woman, and child in the United States, as compared with $241 on average from the rest of the world\u2019s governments for every person in the rest of the world.<\/p>\n<p>Is there something about the U.S. person that requires 36 times as much investment in warmaking as the non-U.S. person? Of course not. Nor is there anything in so-called \u201chuman nature\u201d that requires another dime for this madness anywhere. But if anyone should use the feeble excuse of \u201chuman nature\u201d it should probably not be the outlier with little in common with 96% of humanity.<\/p>\n<p>Those inclined toward the normal and standard should be aware that U.S. military spending, like the aforementioned debt, like U.S. incarceration, and like U.S. gun violence, is freakish and bizarre.<\/p>\n<p><i>David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is executive director of <a href=\"http:\/\/worldbeyondwar.org\/\">WorldBEYONDWar.org<\/a> and campaign coordinator for <a href=\"http:\/\/rootsaction.org\/\">RootsAction.org<\/a>. Swanson\u2019s books include<\/i> War Is A Lie <i>and<\/i> When the World Outlawed War<i>. He blogs at <a href=\"http:\/\/davidswanson.org\/\">DavidSwanson.org<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/warisacrime.org\/\">WarIsACrime.org<\/a>. He hosts <a href=\"http:\/\/davidswanson.org\/taxonomy\/term\/41\">Talk Nation Radio<\/a>. This originally appeared at <a href=\"http:\/\/worldbeyondwar.org\/\">WorldBEYONDWar.org<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reprinted from World BEYOND War: Recently the least popular person alive said, \u201cI didn\u2019t guarantee no war. Why would I have built the strongest military in the world?\u201d Already unpopular with kind and decent people, Trump may have \u2014 with that comment \u2014 tanked his popularity with every weapons company public relations hack on Earth. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":214,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_social_image_id":56682,"_social_image_url":"","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[927],"class_list":["post-59651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"0","custom_donate_message":"","_social_image_id":"56682","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/214"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59651"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59651\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59654,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59651\/revisions\/59654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59651"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=59651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}