{"id":59731,"date":"2026-06-15T06:26:53","date_gmt":"2026-06-15T14:26:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=59731"},"modified":"2026-06-15T06:36:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-15T14:36:12","slug":"shouldnt-canadians-at-least-debate-expanding-war-against-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2026\/06\/15\/shouldnt-canadians-at-least-debate-expanding-war-against-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"Shouldn\u2019t Canadians at Least Debate Expanding War Against Russia?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Canada is moving towards direct war with Russia. And the escalation to the NATO proxy war is happening with barely any pushback.<\/p>\n<p>Recently Kremlin spokesperson Maria Zakharova threatened Ottawa over a Department of National Defence facilitated venture between Canadian and Ukrainian drone makers. Under the joint venture drones from Hamilton will be sent directly to Ukraine\u2019s military.<\/p>\n<p>Zakharova accused Canada of being \u201ca warmonger, seeking by any means necessary to further fuel this bloody conflict.\u201d She added, \u201cwe reserve the right to provide an appropriate response.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The drone agreement is but one of many ways Canada has been arming Ukraine. In what would represent a major escalation of Canada\u2019s contribution to the war, Ottawa may buy Swedish Gripen fighter jets as part of a plan the European Union has to offer Ukraine warplanes. The agreement to buy fighter jets from Saab would include Gripens built in Ontario for both the Canadian and Ukrainian air forces.<\/p>\n<p>In four years, Canada has given Ukraine $9 billion in arms. At $25 billion total, Canadian spending on the proxy war is more than Ottawa spent on its 13-year occupation of Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<p>Canada is flirting with direct war through its large military presence on Russia\u2019s border in Latvia. In recent weeks the Russians have claimed that drone attacks on its territory are being coordinated from Latvia and its drones have reportedly entered that country\u2019s airspace. A week ago, the head of the Latvian military bombastically declared that a war was likely to break out by 2028 due to Russia\u2019s purported drone advantage. General Kaspars Pud\u0101ns told the <em>Financial Times<\/em> Moscow may exploit a \u201cwindow of opportunity\u201d by the end of 2028 to invade the Baltic states.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCanadian troops are steeling to fight Russia. Will Ottawa back them?\u201d, read a recent <em>National Post<\/em> article. More than 2,000 Canadian troops are stationed in Latvia and the Canadian-led NATO brigade keeps growing and bolstering its position near the Russian border. According to Defense News, \u201cThe Canada-led NATO brigade in Latvia has moved beyond its original \u2018tripwire\u2019 deterrence posture and is now focused on mounting a credible defense of the Baltic country bordering Russia, according to its commander, Col. Kris Reeves. Reeves said the shift towards what he described as \u2018tactical credibility\u2019 has meant establishing forward locations and stationing troops near Latvia\u2019s eastern border, in the terrain where they would actually fight in the event of a conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ottawa keeps pouring money into NATO infrastructure in Latvia. Three weeks ago, Canada broke ground on a $70 million upgrade to its base in the country and through Operation REASSURANCE Canada has invested more than $315 million in military infrastructure in Latvia since sending troops there in 2017. Canada has committed to maintaining troops in the Baltic state until at least 2029.<\/p>\n<p>These measures have come without any real political discussion. There is near unanimity in the House of Commons and dominant media about Canada\u2019s contribution to the NATO proxy war.<\/p>\n<p>During the NDP leadership race Avi Lewis declared that \u201cUkraine should not have to give up an inch of its territory, and Canada should continue providing the <em>defence assistance<\/em> that Ukraine needs to protect its sovereignty.\u201d He subsequently reappointed the hawkish Heather McPherson, who is on the NATO Parliamentary Association, as NDP foreign affairs critic. Since before Russia\u2019s illegal 2022 invasion McPherson has been pushing the Liberals to be more aggressive towards that country. Over the past few months she\u2019s released multiple aggressive statements, including a recent declaration that \u201cCanada must stand up for democracy and against Putin&#8217;s barbarous assaults. We must do everything possible to support Ukraine\u2019s defence and democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canada has fueled the NATO proxy war. It\u2019s also inching ever more closely to direct conflict with Russia. Do Canadians believe this is a good thing? Shouldn\u2019t we at least have a discussion about the implications? Is it really a good idea to simply keep repeating \u201cUkraine good, Russia bad\u201d which seems to be the extent of the \u2018debate\u2019 in Parliament?<\/p>\n<p><em>Yves Engler is the author of <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/blackrosebooks.com\/products\/engler-stand-on-guard\">Stand on Guard<em> for Whom? <\/em>A People\u2019s History of the Canadian Military<\/a><em> and twelve other books<\/em>.\u00a0 <em>Read more of his writings at <a href=\"https:\/\/yvesengler.com\/\">his website<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Canada is moving towards direct war with Russia. And the escalation to the NATO proxy war is happening with barely any pushback. Recently Kremlin spokesperson Maria Zakharova threatened Ottawa over a Department of National Defence facilitated venture between Canadian and Ukrainian drone makers. Under the joint venture drones from Hamilton will be sent directly to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":244,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_social_image_id":59736,"_social_image_url":"","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[1315],"class_list":["post-59731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"0","custom_donate_message":"","_social_image_id":"59736","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/244"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59731"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59733,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59731\/revisions\/59733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59731"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=59731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}