{"id":6812,"date":"2010-03-07T19:48:08","date_gmt":"2010-03-08T03:48:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=6812"},"modified":"2010-03-07T19:48:08","modified_gmt":"2010-03-08T03:48:08","slug":"marty-peretzs-cowardice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2010\/03\/07\/marty-peretzs-cowardice\/","title":{"rendered":"Marty Peretz&#8217;s Cowardice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a typical rant, <em>The New Republic<\/em> editor\/publisher Marty Peretz prefaced a rambling declaration of victory in Iraq with these charming words:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There were moments \u00e2\u20ac\u201c long moments \u00e2\u20ac\u201c during the Iraq war when I had my doubts. Even deep doubts. Frankly, I couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t quite imagine <strong>any venture requiring trust with Arabs<\/strong> turning out especially well. This is, you will say, my prejudice. But some prejudices are built on real facts, and history generally proves me right. Go ahead, prove me wrong.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/news\/opinion\/glenn_greenwald\/2010\/03\/06\/peretz\/index.html\">Peretz is quoted<\/a> by Glenn Greenwald, who says most of what needs to be said about Peretz\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s latest display of bigotry. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m sure we can expect a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/article\/something-much-darker\">4000-word J\u00e2\u20ac\u2122accuse<\/a> from Leon Wieseltier condemning his boss\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s racism any day now.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, if one views <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/blog\/the-spine\/sorry-the-verdict-the-long-american-excursion-iraq-and-it-favorable\">Peretz\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s post<\/a> now, one finds that the offending sentence has been changed, without any indication that it used to read differently:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There were moments \u00e2\u20ac\u201c long moments \u00e2\u20ac\u201c during the Iraq war when I had my doubts. Even deep doubts. Frankly, I couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t quite imagine <strong>any venture like this in the Arab world<\/strong> turning out especially well. This is, you will say, my prejudice. But some prejudices are built on real facts, and history generally proves me right. Go ahead, prove me wrong.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The fact that Peretz changed the post (however nasty his revised formulation remains) looks like a tacit admission that he knows he crossed the line. In that case, however, it seems that he should provide an explanation (not to say an apology). Does he believe that Arabs are in fact congenitally shifty and untrustworthy? Does he concede that his slur against Arabs was unacceptable? To simply change his post covertly in the hopes that no one will notice is surely the most cowardly way to deal with the issue.<\/p>\n<p>I realize that it is unwise to waste much time on Peretz. He is an embarrassment, as even his own staffers generally recognize, and the only reason that <em>TNR <\/em>is forced to publish his rantings is that he owns the magazine. Still, if Peretz wants to be taken seriously in public debate it seems reasonable to demand that he conform to some minimal standards of honesty, decency, and responsibility.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a typical rant, The New Republic editor\/publisher Marty Peretz prefaced a rambling declaration of victory in Iraq with these charming words: There were moments \u00e2\u20ac\u201c long moments \u00e2\u20ac\u201c during the Iraq war when I had my doubts. Even deep doubts. Frankly, I couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t quite imagine any venture requiring trust with Arabs turning out especially [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":70,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-6812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/70"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6812"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6813,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6812\/revisions\/6813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6812"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=6812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}