{"id":6892,"date":"2010-03-31T19:26:44","date_gmt":"2010-04-01T03:26:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=6892"},"modified":"2010-03-31T19:26:44","modified_gmt":"2010-04-01T03:26:44","slug":"federal-judge-bush-administration-was-criminal-conspiracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2010\/03\/31\/federal-judge-bush-administration-was-criminal-conspiracy\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Judge: Bush Administration was Criminal Conspiracy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Federal judge Vaughn Walker ruled today that the Bush administration&#8217;s warrantless surveillance program was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/04\/01\/us\/01nsa.html\"><strong>illegal.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This has been obvious ever since the New York Times blew the lid off of the National Security Administration&#8217;s massive surveillance operation in late 2005.  It is amazing that the issue is still open to dispute.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, there is not a snowball&#8217;s chance in hell that busloads of White House, Justice Department, and National Security Administration officials will be going to jail for this crime. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Federal judge Vaughn Walker ruled today that the Bush administration&#8217;s warrantless surveillance program was illegal. This has been obvious ever since the New York Times blew the lid off of the National Security Administration&#8217;s massive surveillance operation in late 2005. It is amazing that the issue is still open to dispute. Unfortunately, there is not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":45,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-6892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/45"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6892"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6894,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6892\/revisions\/6894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6892"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=6892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}