{"id":7085,"date":"2010-05-18T13:52:48","date_gmt":"2010-05-18T21:52:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=7085"},"modified":"2010-05-18T21:02:12","modified_gmt":"2010-05-19T05:02:12","slug":"iran-iraq-whats-the-difference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2010\/05\/18\/iran-iraq-whats-the-difference\/","title":{"rendered":"Iran, Iraq, What&#8217;s the Difference?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Associated Press is running an article today entitled &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/wire.antiwar.com\/2010\/05\/18\/un-powers-back-new-sanctions-against-iraq\/\">UN powers back new sanctions against Iraq<\/a>.&#8221; Of course that is a typo, because the big story today is that the <a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2010\/05\/18\/despite-nuclear-deal-us-send-sanctions-draft-to-un\/\">US is claiming support from the P5+1 for new sanctions against Iran<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>A typo, but there is a shred of truth in it,<a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2010\/02\/26\/decades-later-un-still-pressing-iraq-on-wmds\/\"> as the UN Security Council is still refusing to lift the 1990 sanctions<\/a> against Iraq for &#8220;pursuing weapons of mass destruction.&#8221; To this day certain important pesticides can&#8217;t be imported to Iraq on the assumption that they are &#8220;dual use&#8221; and could be used in chemical or biological weaponry. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Associated Press is running an article today entitled &#8220;UN powers back new sanctions against Iraq.&#8221; Of course that is a typo, because the big story today is that the US is claiming support from the P5+1 for new sanctions against Iran. A typo, but there is a shred of truth in it, as the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-7085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7085"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7085\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7109,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7085\/revisions\/7109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7085"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}