{"id":8509,"date":"2010-11-10T13:21:58","date_gmt":"2010-11-10T21:21:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=8509"},"modified":"2010-11-10T13:21:58","modified_gmt":"2010-11-10T21:21:58","slug":"wednesday-iran-talking-points-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2010\/11\/10\/wednesday-iran-talking-points-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Wednesday Iran Talking Points"},"content":{"rendered":"

from LobeLog<\/a>: News and Views Relevant to U.S.-Iran relations for November 10th, 2010:<\/em><\/p>\n

The Jewish Week<\/a><\/em>: James D. Besser analyzes the impact of the midterm election on the Obama administration\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Iran strategy and concludes it \u00e2\u20ac\u0153may indirectly lead to greater U.S. flexibility on the issue of Israeli military action to stop [Iran\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s] nuclear program.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Shoshana Bryen<\/a>, director of strategic policy for the hardline neoconservative Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA)<\/a> told Besser, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153If you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re talking about the military option, you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not talking about a single strike. If you want to go to war against Iran, that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a choice, but I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t think there will be a lot of support for that in the U.S. military, which is already involved in two wars.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Besser considers it unlikely that the GOP leadership would push for a strike as long as the Pentagon remains opposed to the action. Even David Harris of the American Jewish Committee says \u00e2\u20ac\u0153outsourcing responsibility for Iran\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to Israel would be \u00e2\u20ac\u0153an abdication of U.S. responsibility.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

National Public Radio<\/a><\/em>: Alan Greenblatt examines how 100 new Republican members of Congress will impact on U.S. foreign policy. In examining the Obama administration\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Iran policy, Greenblatt interviews Danielle Pletka<\/a>, vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the hawkish American Enterprise Institute (AEI)<\/a> and reports, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Pletka predicts that Republicans in Congress will push back if Obama continues his policy of seeking diplomatic engagement with Iran, as that nation continues to pursue its nuclear ambitions.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

WINEP Policy Watch<\/a><\/em>: In a briefing from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP)<\/a>, Ehud Yarri discusses the conjoining of Iranian Shia Islamism with that of Sunni Hamas in the Occupied Palestinian Territories through a booklet being circulated in Gaza. Writes Yarri, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Titled The Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic Revolution in Iran<\/em>, this new publication represents the most important attempt to date to connect the growing cooperation between Hamas and its Iranian mentors to religious affinities, rather than political expediency.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d He cites the booklet as a PR effort aimed at showing the two groups as \u00e2\u20ac\u0153natural partner(s)\u00e2\u20ac\u009d despite the usually deep-cutting sectarian divide between Shia and Sunni Muslims.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

from LobeLog: News and Views Relevant to U.S.-Iran relations for November 10th, 2010: The Jewish Week: James D. Besser analyzes the impact of the midterm election on the Obama administration\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Iran strategy and concludes it \u00e2\u20ac\u0153may indirectly lead to greater U.S. flexibility on the issue of Israeli military action to stop [Iran\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s] nuclear program.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Shoshana […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":71,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-8509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/71"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8509"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8510,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8509\/revisions\/8510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8509"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=8509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}