{"id":8963,"date":"2011-01-21T11:27:08","date_gmt":"2011-01-21T19:27:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=8963"},"modified":"2011-01-21T11:27:08","modified_gmt":"2011-01-21T19:27:08","slug":"friday-iran-talking-points-22","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/01\/21\/friday-iran-talking-points-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Friday Iran Talking Points"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lobelog.com\/\">LobeLog<\/a>: News and Views Relevant to U.S.-Iran relations for January 21st, 2011:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/thecable.foreignpolicy.com\/posts\/2011\/01\/20\/team_obama_china_is_acting_responsibly_on_iran_for_real\">Foreign Policy<\/a><\/em>: Josh Rogin, on his <em>Foreign Policy<\/em> blog <a href=\"http:\/\/thecable.foreignpolicy.com\/\">The Cable<\/a>, reports that administration officials are pushing back against a common perception in Congress that China isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t doing enough to support Iran sanctions. In an update to his post, a senior GOP Senate aide responded to the administration official\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s comment, telling Rogin, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153These senior Administration officials continue to obfuscate and misdirect. Chinese entities are clearly in violation of the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA) and the Comprehensive Iran Sanction, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (CISADA).\u00e2\u20ac\u009d The aide continued with a thinly veiled threat: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153If the administration doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t act soon, it faces the loss of its waiver authority and investigatory discretion on these matters.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jpost.com\/Opinion\/Editorials\/Article.aspx?id=204589\"><em>The Jerusalem Post<\/em><\/a><\/em>: The Jerusalem Post\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s editorial board writes that revelations from outgoing Mossad chief Meir Dagan, that Iran is unlikely to have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon until 2015, will make reducing tensions with Iran and redoubling engagement efforts more appealing. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153But while there might be some truth to some these claims, it would be incredibly na\u00c3\u00afve to expect a nebulous engagement policy to convince Iran to abandon a nuclear program that has earned it popularity domestically and heightened diplomatic influence internationally,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d writes the <em>Post<\/em>. The op-ed concludes, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Iran is bent on obtaining the bomb. That the danger may have been delayed by a year or two does not make it any less of an existential threat.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>from LobeLog: News and Views Relevant to U.S.-Iran relations for January 21st, 2011: Foreign Policy: Josh Rogin, on his Foreign Policy blog The Cable, reports that administration officials are pushing back against a common perception in Congress that China isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t doing enough to support Iran sanctions. In an update to his post, a senior GOP [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":71,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-8963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/71"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8964,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8963\/revisions\/8964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8963"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=8963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}