Must Say Yes or No to War
<!- – Copyright 2001-2002, Clickability, Inc. All rights reserved.-->
Last week, during a hearing in the House International Relations committee, I attempted to force the committee to follow the Constitution and vote to declare war with Iraq. The language of Article I, section 8, is quite clear: only Congress has the authority to declare war. Yet Congress in general, and the committee in particular, have done everything possible to avoid making such a declaration. Why? Because members lack the political courage to call an invasion of Iraq what it really is a war and vote yes or no on the wisdom of such a war. Congress would rather give up its most important authorized power to the President and the UN than risk losing an election later if the war goes badly. There is always congressional "support" for a popular war, but the politicians want room to maneuver if the public later changes its mind. So members take half steps, supporting confusingly worded "authorizations" that they can back away from easily if necessary.
Its astonishing that the authorization passed by the committee mentions the United Nations dozens of times, yet does not mention the Constitution once. Congress has allowed itself to be bypassed completely, even though much is made of the Presidents generosity in "consulting" legislators about the war. The real negotiations took place between the Bush administration and the UN, replacing debate in the peoples house. By transferring its authority to declare war to the President and ultimately the UN, Congress not only violates the Constitution, but also disenfranchises the American electorate.
I dont believe in resolutions that cite the UN as authority for our military actions. America has a sovereign right to defend itself, and we dont need UN permission or approval to act in the interests of American national security. The decision to go to war should be made by the U.S. Congress alone. If Congress believes war is justified, it should give the President full warmaking authority, rather than binding him with resolutions designed to please our UN detractors.
Sadly, the leadership of both parties on the International Relations committee fails to understand the Constitution. One Republican member stated that the constitutional requirement that Congress declare war is an anachronism and should no longer be followed, while a Democratic member said that a declaration of war would be "frivolous." I dont think most Americans believe our Constitution is outdated or frivolous, and they expect Congress to follow it.
When Congress issued clear declarations of war against Japan and Germany
during World War II, the nation was committed and victory was achieved.
When Congress shirks its duty and avoids declaring war, as with Korea,
and Vietnam, the nation is less committed and the goals are less clear.
No lives should be lost in Iraq unless Congress expresses the clear
will of the American people and votes yes or no on a declaration of
Ron Paul, M.D., represents the 14th Congressional District of Texas in the United States House of Representatives.
Previous articles by Rep. Ron Paul
Must Say Yes or No to War
Congress Relevant with Regards to War?
We Afford This War?
is a Political Mistake
Alliances Distort our Foreign Policy
that Won't Be Asked About Iraq
Foreign Policy for Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty
Against a War in Iraq
Questions About War in Iraq
in Iraq, War on the Rule of Law
Congress Debate War with Iraq?
Homeland Security Non-Debate
of Homeland Security Who Needs It?
Cuban Markets Good for Cubans and Americans
America a Police State?
or Invasion in Iraq?
Force Taxpayers to Fund Nation-Building in Afghanistan
No to Conscription
in Support of a Balanced Approach to the Middle East Peace Process
Founding Fathers Were Right About Foreign Affairs
Back to Antiwar.com Home Page | Contact Us