Eric’s entry on Tim Starr got me to thinking: Who is the most obnoxious “libertarian” hawk? The most reasonable? On the latter question I’m taking a cue from Alan Bock’s thoughtful comments of last Tuesday and attempting a little holiday civility. I guess I’ll nominate Ronald Bailey for most reasonable; his pro-war arguments don’t impress me, but at least he isn’t a full-time Bush hack.
For most obnoxious… where to begin? I’ll go ahead and nominate Glenn Reynolds, Virginia Postrel, and Neal Boortz— but those are pretty obvious, no? E-mail with seconds and other nominations. Include a link, if possible, and a short explanation for your choice.
