The President’s Murder Spree Expands to the Pacific

The administration is dressing up these crimes as a “conflict,” but there is no one fighting on the other side.

by | Oct 23, 2025 | News | 34 comments

Trump has had five more civilians murdered on his orders, this time on boats in the Pacific:

The U.S. has struck two alleged drug vessels on the Pacific side of Latin America over the last two days, killing five people, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed Wednesday.

The U.S. military has now killed at least 37 people that we know of as part of the president’s ongoing and expanding murder spree. There have been nine attacks since they began last month, and the attacks are happening more frequently. While there has been some opposition to the murders in Congress, it has not been nearly enough to discourage more attacks. The president and Hegseth assume they can get away with these murders, and so far no one has given them a reason to think otherwise.

As the attacks spread to the Pacific, the U.S. is threatening the lives of citizens from every country in the region. The boat strikes have already significantly damaged relations with Colombia, and it seems likely that they will do the same thing to U.S. relations with other countries when their citizens are executed at sea. If Trump wanted to convince everyone in our hemisphere that the U.S. is a thuggish rogue state that kills because it can, he is well on his way.

In one of the earlier attacks in the Caribbean, U.S. forces captured two survivors and then the government extradited them back to their home countries. The administration didn’t want the headache of trying to figure out what to do with prisoners in their made-up “conflict,” so they sent them home. One moment, these men were deadly “narco-terrorists” who deserved summary executions, and the next they suddenly weren’t such a great threat after all. We are told that these men are the Latin American equivalent of Al Qaeda when they are being killed, but it is clear that the administration doesn’t believe their own propaganda.

The Ecuadorian government declined to prosecute the man returned to them because they said they had no evidence that he had committed a crime, and so they released him. It is doubtful that our government has any more evidence than they do. Our military is executing these men on what I assume is extremely thin evidence, if they have any at all. The administration isn’t presenting evidence to support their actions because evidence has never mattered to them. The point of these strikes is to terrorize. The more random and arbitrary the attacks are, the more terrifying they become.

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.

Join the Discussion!

We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.

For more details, please see our Comment Policy.