Venezuela and Trump’s Throwback Imperialism

Overthrowing the government of a much weaker country so that the U.S. can exploit that country’s resources is what he thinks the U.S. should have always been doing.

by | Nov 25, 2025 | News | 3 comments

Michelle Goldberg discusses the bizarre buildup to a U.S. attack on Venezuela:

To hear the administration tell it, our hostilities with Venezuela are largely about the country’s role in drug trafficking. But fentanyl, the drug at the center of America’s addiction crisis, neither originates nor passes through Venezuela. The country is a transit hub for cocaine trafficking, but mostly to Europe. So the administration’s drug war rhetoric seems like a pretext. But a pretext for what?

Regime change in Venezuela has been one of Trump’s few fairly consistent policies since his first term. He sought regime change in 2019 and backed Guaido through the end of the term. Almost as soon as he was back in office, Trump had Venezuela in his sights again. Once he had picked Rubio to be his Secretary of State, the writing was on the wall. It was practically guaranteed that he would be pursuing regime change in Caracas again, and that is what we are seeing unfold right now.

Why target Venezuela? My best guess is that he was frustrated with the failure of his Venezuela policy in the first term, he sees Maduro as a relatively vulnerable target, and he thinks he can rack up a foreign policy “win” at low cost. Bombing Venezuela is wrong and stupid, but it would satisfy almost every faction of the Republican Party. He is also surrounded by Floridian hardliners that have been telling him how easy this will be. Trump may think that he can have a quick war against an extremely weak country and reap the political rewards. He is almost certainly wrong about this, and if he attacks Venezuela it is likely going to haunt the remainder of his presidency.

I assume the anti-cartel framing is being done mostly for the benefit of Trump supporters that don’t like the idea of ideological regime change wars but have no problem with using force to beat down other countries. Regime change in Venezuela is very much Rubio’s policy and it is being pursued for clearly ideological reasons, but if they can dress it up as an attack on cartels that makes it easier for a lot of Trumpists to accept. It may be that Rubio needed to dress it up this way to get Trump fully on board with military action.

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.

Join the Discussion!

We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.

For more details, please see our Comment Policy.