Defund the War

Calling on Congress to endorse a war that the people reject is about as undemocratic as it gets.

by | Apr 1, 2026 | News | 0 comments

After a lot of throat clearing, Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta come up with the wrong answer:

There are four actions that Congress should take. It should approve a war powers resolution authorizing the war, take the time to evaluate any request for additional funding for the war and hold hearings to fully explore the actions, objectives and strategies of the administration in taking military action. The president and the Congress should work together to determine what an endgame to this war, a conclusion that would bring our forces home, looks like.

Other than holding hearings to grill the architects of the war and get them on the record, Congress should do none of this. The Iran war is a war of aggression and a crime against the Iranian people. Belatedly authorizing a war that should never have happened would be an endorsement of that crime. It is bad enough that members of Congress failed in their constitutional responsibilities when they did nothing to stop this war. To approve Trump’s actions after the fact would be so much worse.

The authors are taking a very strange position. They believe the president made a “terrible miscalculation” when he and Netanyahu started this war, but they still want Congress to rally behind that terrible decision and vote in favor of it. They seem to be well aware how damaging and dangerous the war is, but they can’t bring themselves to oppose it.

Hagel and Panetta write, “We need our lawmakers to step up and reassert their rightful role over war powers.” In the next breath, they urge them to surrender and accept the president’s fait accompli. Clapping like seals once the war has begun would not be reasserting Congress’ role in matters of war.

The authors wrap their argument in their concern for the military personnel serving in the president’s criminal war. I don’t doubt that their concern is genuine, but they have a strange way of showing it. Having Congress authorize the war and continue to fund it guarantees that U.S. forces in the region will be at much greater risk than if Congress shut down the war right away.

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.

Join the Discussion!

We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.

For more details, please see our Comment Policy.