Attacking Iran Would Be Monstrous

The U.S. isn’t going abroad in a search for monsters to destroy. The U.S. has taken the monster’s part.

by | Feb 19, 2026 | News | 1 comment

The Financial Timesreport on the approaching U.S. attack on Iran opens with this line:

As oil prices surge and Donald Trump orders one of the largest American military build-ups in the Middle East since the Iraq war, negotiations between the US and Iran increasingly resemble a race against time to avert a new regional conflict [bold mine-DL].

The report isn’t entirely wrong in its description, but it gives readers the false impression that there is some crucial dispute that needs to be resolved to avoid war. Any good news report on the approaching conflict should be able to explain why there is likely to be a war, and most major news outlets are struggling to do this. There is only one reason that war with Iran is coming, and it is happening because the president is choosing to go down this path out of reckless arrogance. The U.S. has waged many wars of choice for bad reasons, but a new war with Iran would stand out as one of the most avoidable and unnecessary of all time.

There is no cause for war. The U.S. government is preparing to attack another country not because of anything that its government has done or threatened to do to us, but solely because the president feels like doing it. The president created the current crisis by making reckless threats and then by ordering a massive buildup in preparation to carry them out. We know that he has been goaded into doing this by the Israeli prime minister and hardliners here at home, but in the end the decisions and the responsibility are his and his alone.

No one can explain what the president wants to achieve by attacking Iran. As far as I can tell, he wishes to use force to punish Iran because they will not cave to his unhinged ultimatum. He wants to use violence because he likes it and he thinks it makes him look “strong.” Trying to understand his thuggish approach to foreign policy in terms of achievable goals misses the point. Much like his use of economic warfare to devastate Iran, he just wants to cause destruction in their country because they will not bend the knee to him.

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.

Join the Discussion!

We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.

For more details, please see our Comment Policy.