Tell Us More About These “Understandings”

Via Reuters:

Robert Gates, the incoming U.S. secretary of defense, won plaudits in Washington this week for his candor on the Iraq war.

Some Israelis were less pleased, however, to hear Gates mention with equal frankness what U.S. administrations have long avoided saying in public — that the Jewish state has the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal.

To be fair, it was pretty oblique.

During his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Gates mentioned why Iran might be seeking the means to build an atomic bomb: “They are surrounded by powers with nuclear weapons: Pakistan to their east, the Russians to the north, the Israelis to the west and us in the Persian Gulf,” he said.

The remark led Israeli news bulletins. State-run radio suggested Gates may have breached a U.S. “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that dates back to the late 1960s.

“It’s quite unprecedented,” a retired Israeli diplomat told Reuters on Thursday when asked about Gates’s testimony. “I can only assume he has yet to get to grips with the understandings that exist between us and the Americans.”

Democratic Warmonger on C-Span

Thursday morning, Democratic Rep. Silvestre Reyes, the incoming head of the House Intelligence Panel, will appear on C-Span’s Washington Journal. He is scheduled for 8:00-8:30am Eastern Time.

Yesterday, Reyes suggested that the US needs to send another 30,000 troops to Iraq.

I hope a few people call in to question his proposal (C-Span asks that you declare your party affiliation when calling in):

Support Republicans: (202) 737-0001
Support Democrats: (202) 737-0002
Support Independents: (202) 628-0205
Outside U.S.: (202) 628-0184

Silly String Pimps for War

A New Jersey mother of a soldier is sending tons of Silly String, that colorful stringy stuff that sprays out of cans, to troops in Iraq. Silly String brand has also offered to send some free of charge.

“Before entering a building, troops squirt the plastic goo, which can shoot strands about 10 to 12 feet, across the room. If it falls to the ground, no trip wires. If it hangs in the air, they know they have a problem. The wires are otherwise nearly invisible.”

So, what’s the substantive difference between providing armor and helmets to US troops occupying Iraq, and providing them a way to detect bomb tripwires? I can’t see any at all. Some would argue that armor and Silly String are just keeping the troops alive long enough to get home. But in the troops’ efforts to survive, many more Iraqis die. In other words, more protection for troops equals more dead Iraqis. Less protection for troops might force more of them to defy their superiors and demand that the war end.

Sure, they might be court-martialed and end up in prison, but I’m not in the business of wailing about the hardships of aggressors. They’re the ones who sold themselves to the State and(/or) signed up for war.

Anyway, if you’re partial to wasting your money on stupid crap like spray foam, don’t waste it on Silly String brand. They’re profiting off, and supporting, the continuing attack on Iraq.

Wiki-vandals

I didn’t know I had a Wikipedia entry until about a year ago. I discovered it by googling my name — a vice that I’m sure most writers indulge in, some more than others. I tried to abstain, or, at least, not indulge too often, but the temptation to go back and see how the entry was evolving was — is — a bit too much for me to resist. Because, for those who don’t know about Wikipedia, anyone is free to edit and re-edit entries: they are also free to create new ones, to add and subtract, in a cybernetic demonstration of the Hayekian theory of spontaneous order. Entries are changed as knowledge develops. and new facts are discovered.

That was how I came to witness the “edit wars” waged on the territory of my entry. Go here to see the long history of that sometimes bitter conflict, an epic battle carried out by such Wiki-warriors as “WillbeBack,” “Huysmanns,” “Darth Jesus,” and a host of others too numerous to mention here. Suffice to say that some — most — editors were constructive: that is, they worked to refine and expand my entry, adding new biographical details and describing my work and ideas, rather than editorializing. Wikipedia has strict rules about that: it is the great sin of POV (pushing a Point of View), and repeated instances can result in the suspension or even explusion of the miscreant from the realm of encyclopedic knowledge that is Wikipedia.

An “edit war” occurs when there is a dispute that goes back and forth, with rival factions battling for hegemony: in such cases, when even a persistent minority-of-one can vandalize an entry at will, an entry is locked down, frozen, so that only registered Wikipedia members can edit it — and a close watch is kept on the premises for any sign of POV-pushing.

My entry has been locked down twice in the past two days, on account of the persistent efforts of two — or possibly just one — “editor.” Here‘s an example of their vandalism: it’s always the same old smears, mindlessly excreted like a foul odor on a bus. What’s interesting is the efforts of the mainstream Wikipedians — the majority that cares about expanding and preserving the record of human knowledge – to fight off and restrain the fanatics. Spontaneous order works. Wikipedia works.

 

Surprise, Surprise — Not!

This just in: 

“In a surprise twist in the debate over Iraq, Rep. Silvestre Reyes, the soon-to-be chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he wants to see an increase of 20,000 to 30,000 U.S. troops as part of a stepped up effort to “dismantle the militias.”

A surprise? That the Democrats are going to screw the voters and betray their mandate for peace? Not hardly. 

Â