Surprise! You’ve been Nuked!

A radical shift in US war planning towards preemptive surprise attacks of a purely technological nature (bombing, space weapons) is the subject of a new article by William M. Arkin in the Washington Post. It seems that Washington is moving towards conflict resolution without the messy US casualties that usually force an end to wars. Since the US public seems much more willing to accept unfortunate non-US civilian casualties than it is American Soldier casualites, this strikes me as sound market-based war planning. Would there be much concern in the US if everyone woke up tomorrow to read that Pyongyang had been nuked in a surprise attack? I wonder…
Arkin calls for a public debate on the issue;

though CONPLAN 8022 suggests a clean, short-duration strike intended to protect American security, a preemptive surprise attack (let alone one involving a nuclear weapon option) would unleash a multitude of additional and unanticipated consequences. So, on both counts, why aren’t we talking about it?

Kamal Nawash Republican Campaign Rally

All right, what’s the deal with this weird rally? Glenn Reynolds is flogging it, so there’s a clue. The other vector appears to be Horowitz.

Hussein Ibish, pointing out the absurd list of “sponsors” (Like Free Republic’s RighTalk, a dress shop in Arizona and a couple of obscure right-wing blogs, for example) says it’s a campaign rally for outcast Republican Kamal Nawash.

On Saturday, May 14, “Free Muslims Against Terrorism,” the group set up to stop criticism of Kamal Nawash by right-wing Zionists like Daniel Pipes and bolster his failed career as a Republican party candidate for local office in Virginia, is holding a “March against Terror” rally in Washington, DC (for more background on Nawash and “Free Muslims” see this). Representatives of most major Arab American and American Muslim groups in Washington received invitations to participate in the March, but all declined given Kamal’s unsavory background and activities, and his close association with and open courting of those most hostile to these communities such as the professional bigot Daniel Pipes and others. Indeed, one of the purposes of the March may be to force the mainstream groups to choose between having to join this unsavory figure and give his appalling efforts undeserved credibility, or decline and face future accusations from the likes of Pipes that their failure to join Kamal’s March indicates some sort of secret support for terrorism against the United States.

Nonetheless, Kamal has been vigorously promoting, with the help of his patrons Pipes, David Horowitz and other enemies of the community, the March and a growing list of “endorsers.” In an effort to inform the public, and to examine more closely who is willing to get into bed with whom, I have assembled the following notes on the organizations he says endorse his “March.” To call it a bunch of strange bedfellows does not really do this list justice. We are looking at everything from clothes shops in Arizona, Moonies, right-wing Zionists, and Christian fundamentalists, to Iranian monarchists, Iraqi supporters of the occupation, Darfurian exiles and Lebanese Phalangists. A few are legitimate organizations, many are fakes and some are certifiable. Some are blogs, some are empty websites, and many are individuals or small groups listed twice or thrice. At least one, the Muslim Canadian Congress, has repeatedly demanded to be removed from the list, but, true to form, Kamal persists in listing them. Almost all are tiny and on some fringe or other especially a grab-bag of ultra-right crackpots, and many are openly hostile to Islam and Muslims. Stranger than fiction, these are the groups that will be rallying in Washington against terrorism on May 14 under the banner “Free Muslims against Terrorism.”

Whatever it was, the Muslim-bashers are gleefully proclaiming that the sparse turnout means Muslims really are all terrorists.

More on the “Free Muslims” here. Ibish:

It looks like an effort to force people into choosing to give Kamal completely undeserved credibility by joining him, or face possible denunciation as agents of terror by declining the poisoned offer. It’s a typically crude ploy, and nobody should be fooled for a second by it.

The only remaining question is: who is giving Kamal the money to allow him to turn himself out like this, complete with office and staff? Since he still has yet to file his 990 financial disclosure forms, we’ll just have to wait to discover who is the Mac Daddy pimping Kamal, if indeed we ever really find out. If we do, I doubt we’ll be too surprised.

Sounds about right.

Team Bush sends Rice to Iraq

Well, I guess since Rumsfeld’s lecture didn’t work, those recalcitrant Iraqis are in for a real scolding now. Team Bush is sending in the Big Nanny:Rice

ARBIL : US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made a surprise visit to Iraq to bolster the country’s fledgling government just hours after US troops announced an end to a campaign to rout insurgents near the Syrian border.

As her visit got underway, the discovery of more bodies and a new string of attacks in Iraq underlined the severity of a security situation that has seen hundreds killed this month alone.

Rice arrived in the northern Kurdish city of Arbil on a C-17 military plane from Qatar. She had flown from Washington in utter secrecy, with only a few aides informed of the trip.

So, Rice sneaks into Arbil to lecture the Kurds, first:

The secretary of state flew immediately to Salahuddin, near Arbil, where she was to meet with the Kurdish leader Massoud Barzani, in a convoy of Blackhawk helicopters with Apache escorts.

Then, it’s on to Baghdad for the Shiites’ spanking:

Rice also was slated to meet with Iraq Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari and senior cabinet members at 3:00 pm (1100 GMT) in Baghdad before holding a press conference.

On the agenda: Stop de-Baathing all the Sunnis and get tough with the resistance.

“I think it is something that I would like to discuss with the leadership, the composition of that committee, and how (…) they can ensure that there is participation of all Iraqis, including Sunnis, in this process.”
[…]
Rice was unfazed by the wave of violence that has left 400 civilians dead since the start of the month, saying it was an attempt by insurgents to derail the political process and to respond to a major offensive launched against them by Iraqi security forces.

“To defeat them by having a political alternative that is strong,” Rice said the Iraqis were now “going to have to intensify their efforts to demonstrate that the political process is the answer for the Iraqi people.”

There was a major offensive launched by Iraqi security forces? I guess the press didn’t get the memo. Ah, well, it’s just diplo-speak for stop embarrassing us with all these car bombs and assassinations! Start cracking heads like a real government!


UPDATE: Here’s an explanation of the committee to which Rice refers above, by Chris Albritton.