Interventionist Mentality

The attention paid to President Bush’s recent interview on the Today Show focused on his comments that the war on terror could not be won. In that same interview he made another revealing comment:

    President Bush: I guess because I made some hard decisions. And we’ve made a decision on Saddam Hussein to remove him from power. Going into Afghanistan to get rid of the Taliban created some unpopularity inside…

    Lauer: But you…

    President Bush: … of Pakistan.

    Lauer: …had great support in Afghanistan.

    President Bush: Now, let me finish for a second. Not in Pakistan. You mentioned Pakistan. It was an unpopular move in Pakistan as you might recall. And yet it was the right thing to do. When I’m making my calculations and I say to the Taliban, ‘Cough up Al Qaeda or face serious consequences,’ I’m not doing a focus group in Pakistan, Matt. I made decisions on what I think is best for this country, and yet the decision to remove the Taliban in Afghanistan was unpopular in Pakistan at the time. And in other places it wasn’t so popular either, I might add — same in Iraq, there’s no question.

This is exactly the problem with interventionists. They disguise their interventions as actions that are “good for our country,” thus allowing them — as Bush says — to ignore the opinions of the foreigners affected by the policy. Examples include the sanctions on Iraq, meddling in Iran in the 1970s and unwavering support for many dictators throughout the world.

Simply ignoring the lack of popular support for US policies outside the US leads to continued hostility with other nations and, with time, more terrorism. Of course, when the US acts defensively, such concerns are less important. However, if the administration was unable to convince both a large portion of the US population and a wide majority of the world population that the war on Iraq was defensive and necessary, perhaps they should have reconsidered their justifications and motives. In the case of Iraq, it was clear that even the biggest lies and fear-mongering were not enough to sway world opinion.

The Qalqilya Arab pen.

qalqwall_aerial

Lawrence of Cyberia writes:

In case you’re not sure what you’re looking at in the first photograph, the white ribbon around the residential center of Qalqilya is Israel’s Wall. The brown areas to the north and south of the town, and outside the wall, are where Qalqilya’s water resources and farmland lie, now abandoned, their crops rotting. There is a gate that opens onto the farmland at the northern side of the Wall, but it has never been opened since the Wall was built. The gate on the south side may or may not be opened (at the whim of the soldiers on duty) three times a day for fifteen minutes each time, to allow children to travel to and from school and for farmers to access their fields. Though for most farmers, it really doesn’t matter if the gate remains locked: they are not allowed to pass through without a permit, and 60% of Qalqilya’s farmers have been arbitrarily refused the permits they need to pass through to their fields on the days when the gate is actually opened.

The end result here will be that as the farmers can’t reach the fields, Israel will declare them “abandoned”. Under Israeli law, Israel then has the right to seize the “abandoned” land for itself.

Read the rest.

Moore Makes NYT Look Better

The Forward of August 27 has an interesting pairing of op-ed pieces. In the first, the Jewish weekly expresses its dismay re the Bush administration’s approval of a new Israel settlement construction project. The approval comes at a time when Israel’s attorney general is suggesting it should “recognize the applicability in the territories of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the 1949 treaty on which the world court relied to declare the fence and the settlements illegal.”

For 37 years, “Israel has rejected the treaty as inapplicable to the territories, and Washington, while disagreeing, has looked the other way. Successive administrations have tut-tutted about ‘obstacles to peace,’ but every president has guaranteed Israel the running room to do what it felt it must.” Now, “while Israelis search desperately for a way to disentangle themselves from their neighbors, Washington is offering to assist in deepening the quagmire.”

If The Forward really thinks a sick joke has gone on long enough, the second piece, John Kerry’s pledge of “unwavering support,” should make it very uneasy.

Ha’aretz columnists Gideon Levy and Meron Benvenisti also think that the Attorney General Mazuz’s recommendation re recognizing the applicabilty of the Geneva Convention is significant. While it apparently doesn’t agree, the New York Times does lament Bush’s “support for a major expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.” And in this context it offers acceptance speech advice, “If Mr. Bush is going to speak seriously about terrorism tonight, he also needs to talk about Israel.” But again, what about “Mr. Kerry?”

Michael Moore doesn’t mention Israel in his USA Today acceptance speech advice offering, “it’s show time” so let’s gush over the Bush daughters for five paragraphs. Linda Stasi has a strong protest piece in the New York Post, but I don’t think she realizes just how much of a burden Moore has become. It’s not surprising that Bush has surged to a double digit lead.

Four US Marines Killed on 9/3/04

As the death total in Iraq inches towards 1000, the Department of Defense press corps has started to work on weekends. DoD press releases have almost always been sent out on weekdays, presumably when the government is at “work.” This weekend however, the DoD released the names of four US Marines killed in Iraq on Friday. Such timing suggests that they hope to get these names under the mainstream press radar. With but one mention of three of these deaths, they have succeeded.

The four Marines killed were:

Lance Cpl. Nicholas Wilt, 23, of Tampa, Fla, died Sept 3 due to enemy action in Al Anbar Province, Iraq. Wilt was assigned to 1st Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, I Marine Expeditionary Force, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, Calif.

1st Lieutenant Ronald Winchester, 25, of Rockville Center, N.Y., died Sept 3 due to enemy action in Al Anbar Province, Iraq. Winchester was assigned to 1st Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, I Marine Expeditionary Force, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, Calif.

and:

Lance Cpl. Nicholas Perez, 19, of Austin, Texas.

Capt. Alan Rowe, 35, of Hagerman, Idaho.

Both Marines died Sept 3 due to enemy action in Al Anbar Province, Iraq. Perez was assigned to 3rd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, I Marine Expeditionary Force, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, Calif. Rowe was assigned to 1st Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, I Marine Expeditionary Force, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, Calif.

Al-Duri capture story bogus

Tikrit – A senior commander in the Iraqi national guard on Sunday insisted his officers had not captured Saddam Hussein’s deputy Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri.

“Our forces did not take part in any operation and did not capture Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri and we do not have any information concerning the subject,” said Major General Ahmed Khalaf Salman, who is commander for the central region where the capture reportedly took place.

“No division took part,” he added.

Another national guard commander in Tikrit earlier told AFP that Ibrahim had been captured in a clinic near his and Saddam’s hometown after fierce that left scores of casualties.

For his part, Doctor Nashwan Mohammed Sabar at the Tikrit General hospital said the ailing Ibrahim had not been brought there.

At the clinic in Ad Dawr, where Iraqi national guard and interior ministry officials said Duri was caught, nurses Hassan Mohammed al-Duri and Shema Kazem Alwan said: “We have never seen Izzat Ibrahim.”

Asked about the flurry of denials, interior ministry spokesperson Adnan Abdelrahman, who had previously confirmed the arrest and provided abundant details about its circumstances, said: “Call the defence ministry because these are the people who told us this story.”

However, Iraqi defence ministry officials were not answering their phones.

For its part, the US military said it did not have custody of Ibrahim, adding its troops were not involved in any such operation and no Iraqi official had informed any American of his arrest.

Apparently some Iraqi made the whole thing up.

Saturday Blog Tour

C. Lounsbury on the US military’s discovery that people don’t hate you as bad when they are accorded some respect and allowed to retain their dignity. Unfortunately, as one Iraqi points out, it’s “too little, too late.” When the US military will realize that bombs in cities raining death down on neighborhoods are worse than bags on heads and boots on necks remains to be seen.

Arthur Silber points out a great rant by Ken Layne. A sample:

With the Crystal Methamphetamine Ball I keep for such occasions, I can predict those of you who continue to invent apologies for this government will tell me that logic, responsibility, coherence and competence don’t matter a damned bit & never will again, because 3,000 of the 300,000,000 people living in this country were killed by an elusive enemy three years ago, and that for some mysterious reason the current inept administration should be further rewarded for failing to catch the culprits, failing to make this country safer from either similar or new-fangled attacks, failing to remove the Taliban and Al Qaeda from Afghanistan or Pakistan, failing to win an elective war that had nothing to do with those who launched a war on our shores, and not only failing to make a dent in the Islamic Terrorism movement but in fact creating millions upon millions of ready new converts who now have a massive wrecked state in the center of the Middle East as a home and training base for decades to come, along with a very new and real reason to attack us on every flank that makes Bin Laden’s flowery historical rhetoric seem quaint by comparison.

I just can’t figure out how anyone can look at our post Sept. 11 leadership and see anything but a smoking heap of tragic failure, and yet that seems to be the only thing the Bush loyalists have to offer as a concrete reason to re-elect this administration. Why? Is Losing the new Winning?

Go to Arthur’s place and follow the links for the rest. In another post regarding the Bushies’ morning-after kiss off of their pet Democrat, Arthur asks, “So Miller ‘was speaking only for himself’ — but he gave the keynote address? And he was selected to give the keynote address precisely because it was known that he would express exactly the views he did?” Not only that, but rumor has it that the RNC PTBs actually vetted Miller’s speech and substantially altered it.

Ken MacLeod On the Axis of Agony:

There can be few who don’t feel anguish at the sight of the Russian school seige and mass terrorist hostage-taking of 400 people, half of them children. The agony of the parents whose children are at the mercy of the murderous Chechen terrorists and the ruthless and bungling Russian security forces is painful to imagine. The prospect of a bloodbath like this anywhere is horrible enough, but its location is one that may yet concern the rest of us.

Northern Ossetia borders not only Chechnya but Southern Ossetia, which is the only place in the world where Russian and US troops are physically present on opposite sides of a shooting war, albeit (for now) a low-key one. (US-backed Georgia is trying to hold on to South Ossetia, whose population has either fled north or is eager to separate from Georgia and re-unify with Russia.) Ossetians are the people everybody called Alan is named after, which may be a subtle clue that messing with Ossetians is not a good idea. The Caucasus could become for this century what the Balkans were for the last.

For further analysis, Ken points us to the War Nerd.

Paul at Explananda posts some interesting numbers from an Independent article analyzing Bush double standards. Here are just a few:

  • 1 Number of Bush administration public statements on National security issued between 20 January 2001 and 10 September 2001 that mentioned al-Qa’ida.
  • 104 Number of Bush administration public statements on National security and defence in the same period that mentioned Iraq or Saddam Hussein.
  • 101 Number of Bush administration public statements on National security and defence in the same period that mentioned missile defence.
  • 65 Number of Bush administration public statements on National security and defence in the same period that mentioned weapons of mass destruction.
  • 0 Number of times Bush mentioned Osama bin Laden in his three State of the Union addresses.
  • 73 Number of times that Bush mentioned terrorism or terrorists in his three State of the Union addresses.
  • 83 Number of times Bush mentioned Saddam, Iraq, or regime (as in change) in his three State of the Union addresses.

TBogg is right – This is good blogging. James Wolcott:

With the transparent, calculating cynicism that marked his two terms in office, Bill Clinton chose to burglarize the majesty of President Bush’s Churchillian convention address by conveniently entering the hospital for heart surgery. Unable to yield the spotlight, Clinton clutched his chest like Fred Sanford and called 911 in a desperate bid to deny Bush the “big mo” he was beginning to enjoy after addressing the nation last night from a mound of skulls at Madison Square Garden, each skull beautifully handcrafted by Thai sweatshop workers.

Michael Bérubé transforms from latte-swilling liberal elite literature professor to rabid far-right Republican he-man warmonger and back again! See the RNC blogged from the point of view of a fanatic new convert trying desperately to cash in on no-bid Iraq contracts, just like a real Republican!Unfortunately, he didn’t quite make it through Bush’s acceptance speech:

Cheers, cheers, and more cheers. But when the cheers died down, Bush went off on this riff about how John Kerry wants to spend two quintillion dollars on government programs that tell people how to run their lives, and at that point, I had to poke Norquist again and say, “hsssst, Grovermeister man, this speech is seriously in the realm of Johnny Cochrane it-does-not-make-sense land. Bush has got to talk about grabbing terrorists’ throats, m’fren’, and– ”

Readers, I never finished that sentence. First, Grover turned to me, whistled for silence in the suite, and then took my tumbler of single-malt, walked slowly over to the wet bar, and ceremoniously dumped it in the sink. Suddenly I felt a hand on my neck and a couple of hands in the small of my back, and before I knew it, four or five of my new friends were hustling me out of the suite, into the elevator, and right out one of Madison Square Garden’s service entrances on the 31st Street side. Rich Lowry followed me down, roughly tossed my laptop and my no-bid Najaf contract to me, and said, “you should know that you’re now back on the Lynne List. And if you blog about this, you French-fried flip-flopper, you can just forget about boarding an airplane for the next four years.”

Raed Jarrar:

I called one of my friends at Najaf today, Dr. Haidar, and he was telling me how catastrophic the situation in the city is. He said that the number of CIVILIANS killed is 950, and another 1570 were injured which is more than 5 times the number of Iraqis killed and injured in Najaf during the 2003 war.

Haidar used to work in the main hospital in Najaf before the U.S Army closed it some months ago because they were attacked by Iraqi fighters from the hospital, and the hospital was never re-opened.

Najaf, as Haidar says, looks like a battle field. Most of the houses were affected in a way or another because of the street-fighting there. Two of his cousins were killed during the fights, one of them is a mother of two children, and the other the father of five. Both of them were at their homes.