Rhetorical Formalities on U.S. Tyranny-Funding in Egypt

Back when the Egyptian revolution was at its beginning and before longtime ally Hosni Mubarak had yet been ousted, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) was vocal about stopping U.S. economic and military aid to Egypt if Mubarak did not step down. He said “if [Mubarak] doesn’t leave, there will not be foreign aid; I mean, it’s as simple as that.” He recognized back then that U.S. aid unnecessarily and savagely promotes dictatorship and repression and had for decades.

Ever since Mubarak’s fall, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, who took over interim responsibilities until elections could take place (which did finally occur this week) have been steadfastly supported by the United States. They have failed to live up to almost every promise and reform explicit and implicit in the Egyptian revolution. They’ve drastically increased detentions of peaceful protesters who then are subjected to military trials, they’ve continued harsh crackdowns, and have upheld the repressive Mubarak-era emergency law. All while U.S. money, weapons, and military-to-military cooperation remained unwavering.

Today Leahy wrote a piece in Politico singing the same tune:

As Congress is completing work on the annual foreign assistance funding bill, a key issue now is how to recalibrate the terms of U.S. military aid to Egypt. The answer is clear: We should support the goals advanced by the Egyptian people and accepted by their military leaders.

U.S. military aid to Egypt should be conditioned on the holding of free and fair elections; an end of the abuse of emergency rule; and respect for due process and fundamental freedoms.

…Because Egypt is viewed as a stabilizing force in its region — and one that shared key interests with the U.S. — our aid for decades has supported a government that used repression and corruption to seal its grip on power. Moderate voices were routinely and repeatedly jailed. Political parties were denied the ability to meaningfully organize or participate.

Now the once-revered Egyptian military itself is showing signs of unwillingness to respond to public frustration with what people expected would be a steady path to civilian government and the rule of law.

…It should particularly concern the American people and U.S. policymakers that during the most recent demonstrations in Tahrir Square, tear gas canisters labeled “Made in USA” are becoming an iconic symbol of outrage about America’s role in this sensitive post-Mubarak era. Many are asking: Whose side is Washington on?

Actually, he’s been singing this tune for some time. He is the primary author of what’s called the Leahy Law, enacted in 1997, which prohibits U.S. assistance to foreign military or security forces credibly accused of human rights violations. Problem is, it is utterly ignored by the criminals in Washington who systematically disregard their own laws. Also, the legislation technically applies only to programs funded under the Foreign Operations Act and the Defense Department Appropriations Act and does not apply to drug enforcement and non-Defense Department counterterrorism assistance. These technicalities and along with blatant outlawry on the Hill, have allowed the government to consistently circumvent the law’s injunctions.

But with regards to Leahy’s opening line, that “we should support the goals advanced by the Egyptian people.” Well, I think the answer there is clear. Whenever they’ve been given the chance, Egyptians have decried U.S. assistance and interference in their affairs, not only rejecting aid but articulating how the past four decades of interference has robbed them of peace and individual rights. So…guess that’s settled, eh?

Not exactly. Leahy writes in that piece about how a Senate and a House version of an appropriations bill for aid to Egypt – both instinctively allocating $1.3 billion of Americans’ tax dollars without any question – are different. The House version he says, is the same old supporting dictatorship kind of appropriations bill. The Senate version has conditions. Yeah, sure. Conditions that will receive about as much regard as the Leahy Law has.

21 thoughts on “Rhetorical Formalities on U.S. Tyranny-Funding in Egypt”

  1. The United States of America has been supporting dictators, terrorist regimes across the Middle East for years. The United States of America is a terrorist nation funding & arming dictators like Mubarak when he ruled Egypt with an IRON fist knowing full well of his torture camps, oppression to other groups within Egypt . They know support the supreme council of the armed forces.
    Its history repeating itself, just like 1953 when the corrupt USA removed Mossadeq to replace with a prowestern dictator the SHAH, the SHAH's barbaric rule gave rise to the extremist state that is the Islamic republic of IRAN. USA sold arms to both terrorist regimes of Saddam Husseins IRAQ & the Islamic republic of IRAN.
    US aggression & killing of innocents across the Middle East then resulted in breeding more terrorists & terrorism. This resulted in the 9/11 attacks on innocent civilians in New York as a result of US corruption & aggression. The United States government is nothing more than a bunch of war criminals. 48% per cent of all the worlds military spending comes from one corrupt nation. The satanic nation of the United States of America.

  2. Sources of funding include credit, donations, grants, savings, subsidies, taxes, Fundings such as donations, subsidies and grants that have no direct requirement for return of investment are described as "soft funding" or "crowd funding".

  3. According to the World Health Organization, the main determinants of health include the social and economic environment, the physical environment, and the person's individual characteristics and behaviors.

  4. Pirate Empress Boa Hancock is the only female member of the Shichibukai. She is the Snake Princess of Amazon Lily and rules over the Kuja tribe with her two younger Gorgon sisters, Boa Sandersonia and Boa Marigold.

  5. Funding is the act of providing resources, usually in form of money (financing), or other values such as effort or time (sweat equity), for a project, a person, a business or any other private or public institutions. The process of soliciting and gathering fund is known as fundraising.

  6. I first visited this site.I have read this blog, I have been told that there is mostly good points which are
    adding the importance of blog. Nice work, Keep to write more good news.

  7. Very nice website. You share a bundle of information in this article . You stuff is really very helpful and informative. Keep writing. Thanks a lot for sharing.

  8. This is my first visit to your blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same niche as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a admirable job. I actually added your blog to my favorites and will look forward for more updates.

  9. The information and the aspect were just wonderful. I think that your viewpoint is deep, it’s just well thought out and truly incredible to see someone who knows how to put these thoughts so well. Good job!

  10. Curiosity killed the cat,” Fesgao remarked, his dark eyes unreadable.
    Aly rolled her eyes. Why did everyone say that to her? “People always forget the rest of the saying,” she complained. “‘And satisfaction brought it back.” summer wedding outfits

  11. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your website with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.

  12. Really a very nice website and good information and it is nice to read the information provided and such these types of websites also help to students to find the proper way for their carrier and it is better approach to carry on the education and basically concept for the return color of the good think provide by writer.thanks

Comments are closed.