The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault.
Major Ralph Peters, US Military
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

April 9, 2008

Jordan Acted as Hub for US Renditions, Report Says

by William Fisher

Jordan, often described in the mainstream press as the most moderate country in the Arab Middle East, was the first to receive prisoners "as a true proxy jailer for the CIA" and has received more victims of "extraordinary rendition" than any other country in the world, according to a new report by Human Rights Watch (HRW).

The report charges that U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, were aware that "Jordan was already notorious for torturing security detainees" because the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) "already had a history of close relations" with Jordan's General Intelligence Department (GID).

HRW charges that "Torture and cruel or inhuman treatment seems to have been systematically used" against most of the detainees rendered by the CIA to Jordan. "Detainees claim they were threatened, beaten, insulted, deprived of sleep, and subjected to falaqa – a form of torture in which the soles of the feet are beaten with an object," HRW says.

The report claims that rendered prisoners were "hidden whenever the International Committee of the Red Cross visited."

It adds that the CIA's long-standing relationship with Jordanian security services may have given U.S. officials confidence that the Jordanians "would be particularly good at keeping the fact of the detentions secret."

Joanne Mariner, director of the Terrorism and Counterterrorism Program for Human Rights Watch, told IPS, "The rendition cases we've documented in Jordan show the unreality of the [George W.] Bush administration's claims that it did not hand people over to face torture."

She added, "Not only did the CIA illegally detain prisoners in its own prisons in the years after Sept. 11, it secretly outsourced the interrogation, detention, and torture of more than a dozen prisoners in Jordan."

HRW says the precise number of people rendered to Jordan by the CIA is not known. But it asserts that rendered prisoners were taken to Jordan for one purpose only: to extract confessions of terrorist activities. "It is clear that many of the detainees were returned to CIA custody immediately after intensive periods of abusive interrogation in Jordan," the report says.

Some of these people were then returned to custody in their home countries, while others were taken to the U.S. Naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where some of them still remain. At least five men who are currently detained at Guantanamo were previously rendered to Jordan for some amount of time during the period of 2001 to 2004, HRW says.

In addition, at least two Yemeni prisoners who were later held in secret CIA prisons – without being sent to Guantanamo – were arrested in Jordan and held in the custody of the Jordanian security services for a few days or weeks prior to their transfer into U.S. custody.

HRW says "Some of the detainees who arrived in Jordan in 2002 were held for more than a year," leaving Jordanian custody in 2004. Some former prisoners told Human Rights Watch that "for a while in 2002 and 2003 the detention facility was full of non-Jordanian prisoners who had been delivered by the CIA."

The report says that after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the CIA quickly began rendering suspected terrorists to Jordan for interrogation.

The number of detainees rendered by the CIA to Jordan may have declined over time because the CIA developed its own detention capacity, opening secret facilities in Thailand, Afghanistan, Poland, and Romania, and had less need to rely on Jordan, the HRW report says.

The report concludes that U.S. government officials, including Rice, were well aware of the hollowness of the "diplomatic assurances" it received from Jordan that it would not subject rendered prisoners to torture.

The report recalls that Rice, under pressure from European allies because of press revelations about CIA activities in Europe, offered a vigorous defense of U.S. rendition practices in December 2005.

Arguing that the practice of rendition was a "vital tool in combating transnational terrorism," Rice insisted that the United States "does not transport, and has not transported, detainees from one country to another for the purpose of interrogation using torture." Instead, she explained that, where necessary, "the United States seeks assurances that transferred persons will not be tortured."

However, HRW says, "The systematic nature of the abuses suffered by prisoners rendered to Jordan contradicts Rice's bland reassurances. If the Jordanians did indeed promise the U.S. authorities that prisoners rendered there would not be tortured, it was a promise that neither the U.S. nor Jordan believed."

The Jordan chapter of the U.S. State Department's 2001 human rights report states that prisoners in the custody of Jordanian police and security forces have alleged that "methods of torture include sleep deprivation, beatings on the soles of the feet, prolonged suspension with ropes in contorted positions, and extended solitary confinement."

The report notes that Michael Scheuer, a former CIA officer who claims to have initiated the terrorist rendition program during the Bill Clinton administration (1993-2001), "rightly dismisses these assurances as 'legal niceties' – pledges meant to look good on paper, which provide no real protection."

HRW reports that Pakistan, and in particular the city of Karachi, was the source of at least six detainees believed to have been rendered to Jordan from U.S. custody. "The Pakistani authorities have made no secret of the fact that since September 2001 they have handed over several hundred terrorism suspects to the United States, boasting of the transfers as proof of Pakistan's cooperation in U.S. counterterrorism efforts," HRW says.

"A large number of these men ended up at Guantanamo; some ended up in secret CIA prisons, and others were rendered to Jordan and other countries."

The U.S. practice of rendering terrorist suspects abroad – transferring prisoners to foreign custody outside of normal legal proceedings – predates the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. During the Clinton administration, the CIA rendered a number of Egyptian terrorist suspects from countries such as Albania and Croatia to Egypt, where some of them had previously been sentenced to death in absentia.

HRW notes that after September 2001, the CIA's rendition practices changed. "Rather than returning people to their home countries to face 'justice' (albeit justice that included torture and grossly unfair trials), the CIA began handing people over to third countries apparently to facilitate abusive interrogations."

Following the 9/11 attacks, President Bush signed a classified presidential directive giving the CIA expanded authority to arrest, interrogate, detain, and render terrorist suspects arrested abroad. Since that time, the U.S. is believed to have rendered terrorism suspects to the custody of Egypt, Morocco, Libya, and Syria, in addition to Jordan.

The HRW report calls on the U.S. government to repudiate the use of rendition to torture as a counterterrorism tactic, discontinue the CIA's rendition program, and "disclose the identities, fate, and current whereabouts of all persons detained by the CIA or rendered to foreign custody by the CIA since 2001, including detainees who were rendered to Jordan."

(Inter Press Service)

comments on this article?

  • Obama Faces Spate of 'Terror War' Lawsuits

  • Red Cross Report Bolsters Case for Bush Inquiry

  • Obama Follows Bush on Detainees

  • Senate Committee Weighs 'Truth Commission'

  • Lawsuits Challenge Charity Blacklisting

  • Al-Marri Lawyers Seek Supreme Court Review

  • Britain Admits Complicity in U.S. Rendition

  • What About Bagram?

  • Gitmo Report Contradicts Govt. Claims of 'Humane' Detention

  • Court Passes the Buck on Fate of Chinese Muslims

  • Democrats Divided Over 'Reckoning' for Bush

  • Lawsuit Sheds More Light on Terror War Abuses

  • Rendition Case Enters 'Bizarre' Realms of Secrecy

  • 'State Secrets' Privilege Not Gone With Bush

  • The Children of Guantánamo

  • Study Challenges Claims of Gitmo Recidivism

  • Indefinite Detention Case to Test Obama's Pledges

  • Close Torture Loopholes, Physicians' Group Urges

  • Muslim World Hails End of a Despised Symbol

  • Fate of Guantánamo Detainees Still Murky

  • Bagram: Worse Than Guantanamo?

  • 'Bad Apples' Didn't Fall Far From the Tree

  • Immunity Recedes for Private Contractors in Iraq

  • Ret. Officers Urge Obama to Expunge 'Stain of Torture'

  • Freedom Recedes for Uighurs at Guantanamo

  • Next President Will Inherit Guantanamo Dilemma

  • Muslim Charity to Get
    Its Day in Court

  • The Most Secretive Administration Ever?

  • Muslim Charities Negotiate a Minefield

  • Arar Faces Uphill Legal Battle

  • One-Fifth of Iraq Funding Paid to Contractors

  • Hamdan's Future Remains Unclear

  • NGO 'Blacklist' Unfair and Arbitrary, Groups Say

  • New Spying Law Quickly Challenged

  • Hamdan Case to Test Military Tribunals

  • Uyghurs Jailed From Guantanamo to Beijing

  • 'State Secrets' Privilege Derails Rendition Suit

  • Guantanamo Trials Hit Setbacks

  • Lawmakers Seek Probe of 'Media Generals'

  • Abuse Claims Mount Against Pentagon, Contractors

  • Fabricated 'Bioterrorism' Case Collapses

  • Groups Wrangle with CIA over 'Ghost Prisoners'

  • Courts May Get More Latitude on 'State Secrets'

  • Trials of Muslim Charities Likened to a Witch-Hunt

  • Serious Abuses No Bar to US Military Aid

  • Jordan Acted as Hub for US Renditions, Report Says

  • Arab Govts Ever More Draconian, Group Says

  • Reforms Failed to Curb FBI Spying

  • Former Gitmo Prosecutor to Testify for Defense

  • We Don't Do Torture – Especially in Debates

  • Just Waterboarding Under the Bridge

  • Bush, Congress Wrangle Over Domestic Spying

  • Renditions Clothed in State Secrets Mantle

  • Experts Doubt Fair Trials for Gitmo Suspects

  • Bush's Budget Sidelines Transparency

  • Bush: Uniter, Decider, and Now, Interpreter

  • Congress Seeks to Limit 'State Secrets' Privilege

  • Afghan Prison Looks Like Another Guantanamo

  • Terror Prosecutions Shed More Heat Than Light

  • Legal Community Condemns Destruction of CIA Tapes

  • 'Black Site' Survivor Relates Horrific Tale

  • Bush's New Spin Master
    a Lame Duck?

  • Glaring Hypocrisy of Arab Annapolis Participants

  • Civil Libertarians Warn of 'PATRIOT Act Lite'

  • Gitmo Policy Faces Another Supreme Court Test
  • William Fisher writes for Inter Press Service.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2017 Antiwar.com