It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

March 5, 2009

Senate Committee Weighs 'Truth Commission'

by William Fisher

In a preview of the heated divisions likely be triggered by the formation of a "truth commission" to investigate detainee interrogation, warrantless wiretapping and other alleged violations during the administration of President George W. Bush, witnesses before a Senate committee Wednesday characterized such a body as either a "profoundly bad idea" or "critically important to avoiding the mistakes of the past."

The hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee was the first held in Congress to explore the truth commission proposal put forth by committee chairman Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat of Vermont.

One of the witnesses, former U.N. Ambassador Thomas Pickering, who also served as undersecretary of state during the administration of George Herbert Walker Bush, told the senators, "It's not enough to say we're going to look ahead. We need to know where we've been, what happened, and the implications for the nation and our foreign policy."

He added that the nation must "take stock" in order to "neutralize the narrative of our adversaries" and "restore our reputation in the world."

But another witness, David Rifkin, a senior Justice Department official under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, told the committee that Congress has no authority to "outsource criminal investigations" to another body.

In response to a comment from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, Rifkin said he thought the "real idea behind a truth commission is to target a small number of Bush administration officials."

"The Department of Justice should do that," he added.

The testimony before the committee mirrors the country's diversity of opinion about the wisdom of a truth commission among legal scholars, human rights and religious advocacy groups, as well as between Democrats and Republicans.

A Gallup poll, released last month, found that on the issue of detainee torture, 38 percent favored a criminal investigation while 24 percent favored an inquiry by an independent panel; 34 percent of those polled said they did not support additional investigation of Bush's policies.

President Barack Obama has approached the truth commission proposal with caution. He told a recent press conference that his inclination was to look forward, not backward, but that "no one is above the law."

The views of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, appear to have changed over time. She refused to hold impeachment hearings when George W. Bush was president, but now prefers a "blue-ribbon panel" to probe the Bush administration. She also wants the Department of Justice to appoint a special prosecutor.

Such a panel has been proposed in the House by Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat.

Human rights and religious groups have also been divided on the truth commission issue.

One religious group, the National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT) has called for an impartial, nonpartisan, and independent "Commission of Inquiry" to investigate U.S.-sponsored torture and to ascertain the extent to which Bush administration interrogation practices constituted "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." Its statement was signed by nearly two dozen prominent religious leaders, representing a broad array of religious denominations.

The American Civil Liberties Union has urged the establishment of a Select Committee to work in conjunction with Senator Leahy's commission, believing that the combination of both committees would be an effective format for congressional review of Bush administration policies.

Another prominent human rights organization, the Center for Constitutional Rights, believes that the issue should be resolved by the Obama Justice Department.

One witness before Leahy's committee, Jeremy Rabkin, a law professor at the George Mason University School of Law, told senators that simply being called to testify before a "truth commission" would imply guilt. He said the commission would be a violation of the witnesses' civil rights, since "witnesses would not be able to defend themselves" as they would in a criminal prosecution in court.

But another witness, retired Admiral Lee Gunn, former Inspector General for the Navy, endorsed the truth commission idea and was highly critical of the detainee treatment practices of both the military and the Central Intelligence Agency. He said the guidance given by U.S. military and civilian leaders regarding the custody and interrogation of prisoners was "unclear, ambiguous, or just plain wrong."

"We have failed American service men and women over the past eight years," he declared, adding, "We have damaged the reputations of people who are trying to win hearts and minds" abroad.

Witness John Farmer, who served as a senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, expressed support for an independent commission to examine Bush administration detainee and interrogation policies and practices. He told the committee that torture of detainees has been counter-productive.

"Our tactics have prevented us from prosecuting" people involved in the 9/11 conspiracy, citing the case of the alleged 20th hijacker, Mohammad al-Qahtani.

The hearing's intensity was heightened by the release earlier this week of a number of memoranda from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), the unit that advises the president on major legal matters. Some of these memos told former President George W. Bush that, in wartime, he could send troops to arrest and detain people within the U.S. as "enemy combatants," suspend the Constitutional rights of free speech and press, and spy on U.S. citizens without a warrant or showing of probable cause.

Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the senior Republican on the committee, said, "the OLC opinions are shocking."

Near the top of the agenda for senators and witnesses was the issue of whether any kind of immunity from prosecution should be granted to those who testify before a truth commission.

Sen. Leahy said he was not interested in having the Justice Department prosecute low-level people and would consider granting them immunity. He said the work of a "truth commission" would be fact-finding and that evidence of criminal violations would be referred to the DOJ.

(Inter Press Service)

comments on this article?

  • Obama Faces Spate of 'Terror War' Lawsuits

  • Red Cross Report Bolsters Case for Bush Inquiry

  • Obama Follows Bush on Detainees

  • Senate Committee Weighs 'Truth Commission'

  • Lawsuits Challenge Charity Blacklisting

  • Al-Marri Lawyers Seek Supreme Court Review

  • Britain Admits Complicity in U.S. Rendition

  • What About Bagram?

  • Gitmo Report Contradicts Govt. Claims of 'Humane' Detention

  • Court Passes the Buck on Fate of Chinese Muslims

  • Democrats Divided Over 'Reckoning' for Bush

  • Lawsuit Sheds More Light on Terror War Abuses

  • Rendition Case Enters 'Bizarre' Realms of Secrecy

  • 'State Secrets' Privilege Not Gone With Bush

  • The Children of Guantánamo

  • Study Challenges Claims of Gitmo Recidivism

  • Indefinite Detention Case to Test Obama's Pledges

  • Close Torture Loopholes, Physicians' Group Urges

  • Muslim World Hails End of a Despised Symbol

  • Fate of Guantánamo Detainees Still Murky

  • Bagram: Worse Than Guantanamo?

  • 'Bad Apples' Didn't Fall Far From the Tree

  • Immunity Recedes for Private Contractors in Iraq

  • Ret. Officers Urge Obama to Expunge 'Stain of Torture'

  • Freedom Recedes for Uighurs at Guantanamo

  • Next President Will Inherit Guantanamo Dilemma

  • Muslim Charity to Get
    Its Day in Court

  • The Most Secretive Administration Ever?

  • Muslim Charities Negotiate a Minefield

  • Arar Faces Uphill Legal Battle

  • One-Fifth of Iraq Funding Paid to Contractors

  • Hamdan's Future Remains Unclear

  • NGO 'Blacklist' Unfair and Arbitrary, Groups Say

  • New Spying Law Quickly Challenged

  • Hamdan Case to Test Military Tribunals

  • Uyghurs Jailed From Guantanamo to Beijing

  • 'State Secrets' Privilege Derails Rendition Suit

  • Guantanamo Trials Hit Setbacks

  • Lawmakers Seek Probe of 'Media Generals'

  • Abuse Claims Mount Against Pentagon, Contractors

  • Fabricated 'Bioterrorism' Case Collapses

  • Groups Wrangle with CIA over 'Ghost Prisoners'

  • Courts May Get More Latitude on 'State Secrets'

  • Trials of Muslim Charities Likened to a Witch-Hunt

  • Serious Abuses No Bar to US Military Aid

  • Jordan Acted as Hub for US Renditions, Report Says

  • Arab Govts Ever More Draconian, Group Says

  • Reforms Failed to Curb FBI Spying

  • Former Gitmo Prosecutor to Testify for Defense

  • We Don't Do Torture – Especially in Debates

  • Just Waterboarding Under the Bridge

  • Bush, Congress Wrangle Over Domestic Spying

  • Renditions Clothed in State Secrets Mantle

  • Experts Doubt Fair Trials for Gitmo Suspects

  • Bush's Budget Sidelines Transparency

  • Bush: Uniter, Decider, and Now, Interpreter

  • Congress Seeks to Limit 'State Secrets' Privilege

  • Afghan Prison Looks Like Another Guantanamo

  • Terror Prosecutions Shed More Heat Than Light

  • Legal Community Condemns Destruction of CIA Tapes

  • 'Black Site' Survivor Relates Horrific Tale

  • Bush's New Spin Master
    a Lame Duck?

  • Glaring Hypocrisy of Arab Annapolis Participants

  • Civil Libertarians Warn of 'PATRIOT Act Lite'

  • Gitmo Policy Faces Another Supreme Court Test
  • William Fisher writes for Inter Press Service.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2017 Antiwar.com