Highlights

 
Quotable
We carefully nurture a spirit of detachment toward the wars we pay for.
James Carroll
Original Letters Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

 
December 9, 2006

Kurds Reject US Study Group's Report


by Mohammed Salih

ARBIL - In a strongly worded statement, the president of Iraq's northern Kurdistan region rejected in its entirety the report by the Iraq Study Group, and threatened that Kurds would opt for secession from Iraq should Washington try to implement some of the key recommendations of the report regarding Kirkuk, federalism and the constitution.

The group, co-chaired by former U.S. secretary of state James Baker III and former chairman of the House of Representatives international relations committee Lee Hamilton "made some unrealistic and inappropriate recommendations under the pretext that they are going to get the U.S. out of the current crisis in Iraq," read the statement, signed by Massoud Barzani.

"If under this pretext, they want to impose their inappropriate recommendations on us, then, on behalf of the people of Kurdistan, we announce this report is against the constitution and interests of Iraq and Kurdistan and we will not accept it."

Barzani called for a "real national reconciliation," originating from Iraqis themselves instead of the Iraq Study Group (ISG) report. The 160-page document was released on Wednesday.

"The report has been affected by Arab states and especially Saudi Arabia and I don't think it will have any chance of success," Saadi Barzinji, a Kurdish member of Iraqi parliament, told IPS in a phone interview from Baghdad. He criticized the report for being "unilateral and biased" in its views.

"From a Kurdish and Iraqi perspective, the report is not precise and has not taken many objective factors on the ground into consideration."

The report has also divided politicians in Washington.

U.S. President George W. Bush said, after a meeting with his British ally Prime Minister Tony Blair, that he wouldn't talk to Syria and Iran about Iraq and would not follow all the recommendations in the report.

But Baker told the U.S. Senate Thursday that his group's report must be treated as a whole and not "a fruit salad and say, 'I like this but I don't like that'."

While Baker insists on treating the ISG report as a comprehensive strategy, the Kurds' threats could pose a serious challenge to U.S. efforts to improve the situation in Iraq in preparation for the gradual withdrawal of troops as the report suggests by the end of the first quarter of 2008.

On several principal matters the approaches advised in the ISG report "are in serious collision" with Kurdish interests and trespass Kurdish redlines.

The report advises against holding a referendum on the disputed oil-rich city of Kirkuk, which Kurds want to be incorporated into their northern Kurdistan region.

"As long as the Kirkuk issue is postponed, Iraq will not witness stability," Barzinji warned.

Iraq's constitution, approved by the country's majority Shi'ites and Kurds, has set a three-step roadmap to "normalize the situation in Kirkuk" and hold a referendum on its fate by the end of 2007.

The report urges the White House not to support devolution of Iraq into three semiautonomous regions "as a policy goal or impose this outcome on an Iraqi state."

Experts in Kurdistan fear that would restore Iraq to the old era of strong central regimes in the country.

"A strong central government for Iraq, as recommended in the report, is in opposition to a federal-regional structure, which is a major Kurdish demand," said Azad Aslan, a history lecturer from Arbil's Salahaddin University.

"In fact, this report is nothing but an acknowledgment of the defeat of the United States in Iraq," he added.

The national constitution facilitates the creation of semiautonomous regions in Iraq. But Sunnis, mainly concentrated in central and western parts of the country, worry that powerful federal regions for Kurds in the north, and Shi'ites in the south would leave their relatively barren areas impoverished.

Larger roles for regional powers like Iran, Syria and Turkey "to contain sectarian warfare" in Iraq, as prescribed by the report, implies limited role for Kurds, they worry.

The three neighboring countries have sizable restive Kurdish populations, who have been influenced by developments in Iraqi Kurdistan. Last year, a major opposition party, the Kurdistan Democratic Party-Iran, adopted federalism for Kurdish areas in Iran instead of limited self-rule that it was calling for before.

"If the U.S. is going to leave Kurds in the lures as in 1975, then they should know that Kurds can make U.S. business not only in Iraq but also in neighboring countries harder than any Sunni insurgency can do," Aslan said.

In 1975, Iran and Iraq reached an agreement in Algeria in which Iraq gave up its claims to some islands in the waters between the two countries in return for Iran's withdrawal of support for the Kurdish revolt against the Iraqi government. That led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Kurds to Iran and the collapse of the Kurdish self-rule system in northern Iraq.

The issue, however, is not only confined to Kurds: Iraq's Shi'ites have not welcomed the report either.

The leader of Iraq's largest Shi'ite party, the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, rebuked the report for its "impreciseness" and bluntly said, "I disagree with them (ISG)."

He dismissed a link drew by the Baker-Hamilton group between Iraq and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as "non existent," stressing that "Iraq's dossier has its particularities."

(Inter Press Service)


comments on this article?
 
 
Archives

  • Kurds Headed for Conflict With Baghdad?
    3/4/2009

  • Kurds Anxious Over Security Pact
    11/28/2008

  • Is Kurdish-Arab 'Honeymoon' Over?
    10/1/2008

  • Iraq Deals Overshadowed by Rising Concerns
    5/27/2008

  • Border Shelling Hits Iraqi Kurdish Villagers
    9/22/2007

  • Attacks on Yazidis Bring a Setback to the North
    8/28/2007

  • Iraqi Kurds Wrangle Over Islam
    7/5/2007

  • Kurds Want More Convictions Over Massacres
    6/27/2007

  • Is Iraqi Kurdistan a Good Investment?
    6/22/2007

  • What Next After Samarra Bombing?
    6/20/2007

  • Anxiety in Wake of US-Iran Talks
    6/2/2007

  • The Surge: From Worse to Worst?
    5/30/2007

  • Journalists Face Repression on All Sides in Iraq
    5/22/2007

  • UN Human-Rights Report Sparks Uproar in Kurdistan
    5/8/2007

  • Kurds Fear a New War
    3/10/2007

  • Kirkuk: Sparks Rise From a Time Bomb
    2/27/2007

  • Turkey Could Emerge as a New Threat in Iraq
    2/3/2007

  • Students, Professors Flee to the Kurdish North
    1/27/2007

  • An Unhappy New Year
    Thus Far in Iraq
    1/17/2007

  • Bloody Years for
    Journalists in Iraq
    1/3/2007

  • Iraqi Refugees Run From Violence to Deprivation
    12/25/2006

  • Slim Chance for Iraq Reconciliation Recedes
    12/20/2006

  • Kurds Reject US Study Group's Report
    12/9/2006

  • Iraqi Professionals Targeted for Abduction, Murder
    12/7/2006

  • Kurds Want Early Death for Saddam
    11/14/2006

  • Kurdistan Oil Troubles
    Begin to Surface
    10/25/2006

  • Kirkuk Fearful of Future
    10/2/2006

  • Maliki Govt Fails to Provide Security or Anything Else
    9/19/2006

  • Kirkuk Confronts an Uncertain Future
    9/3/2006

  • Ever Closer to Fears of Civil War
    8/19/2006

  • Iraq's Shias Going Their Own Way
    8/7/2006

  • Iraqi Kurds Keep an Eye on Independence
    6/1/2006

  • Quarrels Overshadow Talk of Iraq Consensus
    1/5/2006
  • Mohammed A. Salih writes for Inter Press Service.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com