Whatever one expected from the aftermath of the
Russo-Georgian war, surely a car
bomb was not among the first choices – yet that is precisely what has occurred.
As Russian forces prepared to leave security zones in South Ossetia and Abkhazia
in the wake of Georgia's humiliating
defeat, they stopped a car with Georgian license plates in which the occupants
were armed. The car was taken to a Russian checkpoint, where it promptly exploded.
Nine Russian soldiers, including a Russian general in the nearby headquarters,
were killed, and seven others were wounded.
A car bomb in the Caucasus?
This is a weapon, and a method of terrorism, with a very familiar signature.
It points to the introduction of a rather sinister aspect to the Russia-Georgia
conflict – the entrance of radical Islamic elements on the field of battle,
and clearly on the side of the Georgians.
The reactions to the blast were all too predictable: the Russians attributed
the incident to the Georgians, and the Georgians pointed
the finger at the Russian special services, notably the FSB. This latter
charge may sound improbable to Americans – after all, why would the Russians
bomb themselves? – but in Russia and its periphery it is quite common for opponents
of the current regime to attribute everything to the supposedly all-pervasive
hand of the Kremlin.
Remember Alexander
Litvinenko, the anti-Putin agitator who found refuge in London and was supposedly
assassinated by the KGB with an exotic
radioactive substance? He was one of the leading lights of the Russian equivalent
of the 9/11 "truthers," who wrote several books
supposedly "proving" that the FSB (and Putin) were behind the bombings
of Russian cities by Chechen terrorists – including the infamous Beslan
incident, in which Chechen and Ingush terrorists killed Ossetian schoolchildren.
A nutty narrative, to be sure, yet Litvinenko was given credibility by the Western
media, naturally, since anything that reinforces their anti-Russian mindset
is considered fair game.
Yet, far from being all-controlling, the Russkies are hardly in the drivers'
seat on the far fringes of their supposedly resurgent empire, as Roger Boyes'
fascinating series on the region in the Times of London makes all
too clear:
"This is where empire falls apart. It had all looked more promising
for the Russians in August. The six-day war against Georgia must have seemed
like a giant step forward for Vladimir Putin's state, which leans so heavily
on the implicit threat of force. Russian forces cut a swath through Georgia,
sapped the authority of a leader who had irritated the Kremlin and secured
at little cost the 'independence' not only of South Ossetia but also of Abkhazia,
with its access to the Black Sea.
"Russia, for the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union, has
a military presence on the other side of the Caucasus.
"But in doing so it has made an arc of crisis out of the M29 [highway
from Ossetia to Ingushetia].
"Russian North Ossetia is counting on a merger with South Ossetia; Russian
subsidies will flow and soon enough there will be a new Christian-dominated
province with scores to settle. Near by: a resurgent Chechnya, massively reconstructing
after a decade of war, bloated with pride and with scores to settle. Sandwiched
in between: the failed state of Ingushetia, a land of political murders. This
week in Nazran a suicide bomber tried unsuccessfully to ram his Lada packed
with explosives into the Mercedes of the Ingushetian interior minister, Musa
Medov."
It looks like the car bombers are running wild in the Caucasus, and, in spite
of what Litvinenko's ghost is mumbling over there in the corner, this is undoubtedly
not the work of the FSB. Islamic radicals infest
the area and are threatening the Moscow-supported regime in Ingushetia,
whose president dares
not leave his gold-domed palace. Car bombings are the radicals' weapon of choice.
Aside from that, however, the blood
feud between the Ossetians and the Chechens – which took center stage at
Beslan – dates back to Stalin's time, when the latter were pushed out and the
former moved in. The classic pattern of displaced peoples in conflict provides
backdrop and context for the mysterious explosion in Ossetia.
In the dirt-poor Caucasian "republic" of Ingushetia, something
wicked
this way
comes
– and it isn't the Russians, who are helpless to stem the rising tide of violence
rapidly engulfing the country. Is it al-Qaeda? The Russians, remember, were
the first
victims of the Islamic jihad that has now turned on the West with a vengeance.
Osama bin Laden, who has boasted
of besting the Russian bear in Afghanistan, is not likely to look on Russia's
resurgence with any more favor than, say, the Weekly
Standard. There is indeed an odd confluence of interests in this part
of the world, an open alliance between ostensible enemies.
All along its periphery and in its "near abroad," Russia is fighting
a war on two fronts: against the
West in Ukraine and the disputed regions of the Crimea and Transnistria,
and against the Islamists in Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, and throughout
Central Asia. Geographically, the former Soviet republic of Georgia is the point
at which these two fronts meet and merge.
The possibility that Islamic radicals – the same groups trying to overthrow
the authority of the "kaffirs" in Ingushetia, Dagestan, and other
nearby splinters of the shattered Soviet colossus – are acting in concert with
the Georgian military should come as no surprise. Nor would anyone be shocked
at the revelation
that these groups may well include
the local al-Qaeda franchise. In wartime, alliances are merely matters of convenience.
Think of it as a modern version of the Hitler-Stalin Pact.
This strategic alliance is reflected, here on the home front, in the strange
phenomenon of neoconservative support for the cause of radical Islamist Chechen
groups. There is the curious phenomenon of the American
Committee for Peace in Chechnya, which has recently been renamed the American
Committee for Peace in the Caucasus. The members of this group – Bill Kristol,
Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, Midge Decter, Frank Gaffney, and Michael Ledeen,
among others – reads like a who's who of the War Party. The same gang
that brought us Iraq would like to open up yet another front in their perpetual
war for its own sake, this time against Russia.
The neocons have been in the forefront of the anti-Russia holy war, with Richard
Perle calling for Russia to be thrown out of the G-8 well before the onset of
the Iraq war, and this agitation has reached a crescendo with Putin's successful
defense of South Ossetia and Abkhazia against the Georgian
invasion. It isn't just the neocons, however, who are eager to take on the
Russians. Barack Obama has echoed
John McCain's fervent support for Georgia, hewing to the Bizarro World interpretation
of the Georgian bombardment of the Ossetian capital – in which hundreds were
killed and injured – as evidence of a Russian "invasion."
The seeds of a wider war are being planted in the Caucasus, and the Bizarro
World quality of all this is underscored by U.S. policy in the region, which
is driving us into a de facto alliance with our worst enemies. If the Georgians
are dallying with the radical Islamic terrorists in a bid to irritate, and
ultimately provoke, the Russians, then we are indirectly aiding and abetting
al-Qaeda as it inspires fresh outbreaks of terrorism in the steppes of Central
Asia.
How many
millions are we sending to Tbilisi? We're training their coast guard on
American ships anchored in the Black Sea. Are we also training their intelligence
service in the fine art of car bombing – or do they farm that out to the real
experts?
~ Justin Raimondo