The third and final act in the national tragedy
that is the Bush administration may soon play itself out. The Okhrana
reports increasing indications of "something big" happening between
the election and Christmas. That could be the long-planned attack on Iran.
An attack on Iran will not be an invasion with ground troops. We don't have enough
of those left to invade Ruritania. It will be a "package" of air and
missile strikes, by U.S. forces or Israel. If Israel does it, there is a possibility
of nuclear weapons being employed. But Israel would prefer the U.S. to do the
dirty work, and what Israel wants, Israel usually gets, at least in Washington.
That this would constitute folly piled on top of folly is no deterrent to the
Bush administration. Like the French Bourbons, it forgets nothing and it learns
nothing. It takes pride in not adapting. Or did you somehow miss George W. Bush's
declaration of Presidential Infallibility? It followed shortly after the visit
to the aircraft carrier with the "Mission Accomplished" sign.
The Democrats taking either or both Houses of Congress, if it happens, will not
make any difference. They would rather have the Republicans start and lose another
war than prevent a national disaster. Politics comes first and the country second.
Nor would they dare cross Israel.
Many of the consequences of a war with Iran are easy to imagine. Oil would soar
to at least $200 per barrel if we could get it. Gas shortages would bring back
the gas lines of 1973 and 1979. Our European alliances would be stretched to the
breaking point if not beyond it. Most people outside the Bushbubble can see all
What I fear no one foresees is a substantial danger that we could lose the army
now deployed in Iraq. I have mentioned this in previous columns, but I want to
go into it here in more detail because the scenario may soon go live.
Well before the second Iraq war started, I warned in a piece in The American
Conservative that the structure of our position in Iraq could lead to that
greatest of military disasters, encirclement. That is precisely the danger if
we go to war with Iran.
The danger arises because almost all of the vast quantities of supplies American
armies need come into Iraq from one direction, up from Kuwait and other Gulf ports
in the south. If that supply line is cut, our forces may not have enough stuff,
especially fuel, to get out of Iraq. American armies are incredibly fuel-thirsty,
and though Iraq has vast oil reserves, it is short of refined oil products. Unlike
Guderian's Panzer army on its way to the Channel coast in 1940, we could not just
fuel up at local gas stations.
There are two ways our supply lines from the south could be cut if we attack
Iran. The first is by Shi'ite militias including the Mahdi Army and the Badr
Brigades, possibly supported by a general Shi'ite uprising and, of course, Iran's
Revolutionary Guards (the same guys who trained Hezbollah so well).
The second danger is that regular Iranian Army divisions will roll into Iraq,
cut our supply lines, and attempt to pocket us in and around Baghdad. Washington
relies on American air power to prevent this, but bad weather can shut most
of that air power down.
Unfortunately, no one in Washington and few people in the U.S. military will even
consider this possibility. Why? Because we have fallen victim to our own propaganda.
Over and over the U.S. military tells itself, "We're the greatest! We're
number one! No one can defeat us. No one can even fight us. We're the greatest
military in all of history!"
It's bull. The U.S. armed forces are technically well-trained, lavishly resourced
Second Generation militaries. They are being fought and defeated by Fourth Generation
opponents in both Iraq and Afghanistan. They can also be defeated by Third Generation
enemies who can observe, orient, decide, and act more quickly than can America's
vast, process-ridden, PowerPoint-enslaved military headquarters. They can be
defeated by strategy, by stratagem, by surprise, and by preemption. Unbeatable
militaries are like unsinkable ships. They are unsinkable until someone or something
If the U.S. were to lose the army it has in Iraq, to Iraqi militias, Iranian regular
forces, or a combination of both (the most likely event), the world would change.
It would be our Adrianople, our Rocroi, our Stalingrad. American power and prestige
would never recover.
One of the few people who do see this danger is the doyenne of American
foreign policy columnists, Georgie Anne Geyer. In her column of October 28 in
The Washington Times, she wrote,
"The worst has not, by any means, yet happened. When I think of abandoning
a battleground, I think of the 1850s, when thousands of Brits were trying to
leave Afghanistan through the Khyber Pass and all were killed by tribesmen except
one man, left to tell the story.
"Our men and women are in isolated compounds, not easy even to retreat
from, were that decision made. Time is truly running out."