No nation ever had an army large enough to guarantee it against attack in time of peace, or ensure it of victory in time of war.
Calvin Coolidge
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

August 2, 2005

Gitmo's Kangaroo Court

First the abuse, now this…

by Joshua Frank

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) obtained two leaked e-mails from former military prosecutors at Guantanamo Bay over the weekend. The e-mails both claim that the military committees set up to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba are "rigged, fraudulent, and thin on evidence against the accused."

In the first e-mail obtained by the Australian news organization, Gitmo prosecutor Major Robert Preston wrote to his supervisor that the trial process at Guantanamo was perpetrating a fraud on the American public. Preston also wrote that the cases being tried were insignificant at best.

"I consider the insistence on pressing ahead with cases that would be marginal even if properly prepared to be a severe threat to the reputation of the military justice system and even a fraud on the American people," Preston wrote. "Surely they don't expect that this fairly half-arsed effort is all that we have been able to put together after all this time. … I lie awake worrying about this every night," he wrote.

"I find it almost impossible to focus on my part of mission. … After all, writing a motion saying that the process will be full and fair when you don't really believe it is kind of hard, particularly when you want to call yourself an officer and lawyer."

Shortly after Preston sent these e-mails to his superior, he was transferred from his post.

In the second e-mail obtained by the ABC, Captain John Carr, who also left his position after his e-mail claimed that the commissions at the prison appeared to be rigged, wrote, "When I volunteered to assist with this process and was assigned to this office, I expected there would at least be a minimal effort to establish a fair process and diligently prepare cases against significant accused. Instead, I find a half-hearted and disorganized effort by a skeleton group of relatively inexperienced attorneys to prosecute fairly low-level accused in a process that appears to be rigged."

Carr also wrote that Gitmo prosecutors were continually told by the chief prosecutor that the panel set up to try detainees was specially selected in order to guarantee convictions.

"You have repeatedly said to the office that the military panel will be handpicked and will not acquit these detainees and that we only needed to worry about building a record for the review panel," Carr wrote.

I'm sure most readers of these pages aren't the least bit surprised by these two former military prosecutors' allegations. As we already know, justice isn't being dished out at Gitmo. It's being choked out. The actions of the U.S. military in Guantanamo's court are in defiance of the Supreme Court's order in the Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case in which Justice O'Connor, writing the majority opinion, argued that Guantanamo detainees must be given "a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for that detention before a neutral decision maker."

Alas, fairness isn't the issue here. As the aforementioned case guaranteed, despite the detainees "meaningful opportunity to contest" their detentions, they are still not allowed any meaningful legal retaliatory rights.

Writing for CounterPunch on June 29, 2004, Elaine Cassel explained, "On this one [the Hamdi case], a 6-3 majority ruled that those poor bastards in Guantanamo, those men that have been there for going on three years and, we now presume, subject to all kinds of physical torture and mental and sexual abuse, can file a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging their detention, but, so what? The court was silent on what trial courts will do with the petitions. Presumably, let them file their papers then promptly toss them out."

So there you have it: first the trials at Gitmo are rigged, then the unjustly convicted are not allowed to challenge their incarcerations. All ethical considerations aside, what we have here is a Constitutional crisis of epic proportions.

comments on this article?

  • The Blood on Holbrooke's Hands

  • No Comment and
    No Leadership From Obama

  • That Other Military Draft

  • Barack Obama's Israel Bond

  • MoveOn's Obama Endorsement

  • Why Bush Wants to Legalize the Nuke Trade with Turkey

  • Antiwar Left Should Look Beyond Democrats

  • Broken Promises and Barefaced Lies

  • The Problem with Barack Obama's Israel Pose

  • Time to Put Politics (and Dem Politicians) Aside

  • Hillary Clinton and
    the Israel Lobby

  • Wake Me When It's Over

  • Snake Oil and the
    Midterm Elections

  • Bye-Bye, Civil Liberties

  • Kidnapped in Israel or Captured in Lebanon?

  • Hillary May Be Presidential Material, After All

  • The Democrats'
    Election-Year Stunts

  • Zarqawi and Lesser-Evil Politics

  • Holding the War Parties Accountable

  • Leftists for Occupation

  • Save Darfur?

  • Challenging Hillary Clinton

  • Kerry's Halfhearted Reversal

  • A War in Search of a Justification

  • Twist and Hate

  • The Democrats'
    Daddy Warbucks

  • Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering

  • Redeployment: Another Election-Year Stunt

  • Who's the Bigger Hawk, George or Hillary?

  • MoveOn.org Surrenders

  • Bird-Dogging Hillary Clinton

  • Hillary in the Holy Land

  • Talking Points Propaganda

  • Washington Democrats: No Will, No Backbone

  • In Defense of Lew Rockwell

  • You Can't Fight 'Ists' and 'Isms'

  • Top Democrats Flee Peace Protests

  • NYPD Unplugs Cindy Sheehan, but Not the Antiwar Movement

  • Bunny Bugs the War Profiteers

  • The Democrats and Cindy Sheehan

  • Gitmo's Kangaroo Court

  • With Hand on Heart: Pelosi Admits Israel Comes First

  • Horowitz's Gang Smears the Dead

  • Support the Troops, Oppose Their Actions

  • 'Dead Wrong' and Probably Not for the Last Time

  • Howard Dean Still Selling Out the Antiwar Movement

  • The War Path of Unity

  • Recovering From Kerry

  • Democrats and Iran: Look Who Supports Bush's Next War
  • Joshua Frank is the author of Left Out!: How Liberals Helped Reelect George W. Bush, just published by Common Courage Press. You can order a copy at a discounted through Josh's blog at www.brickburner.org. He can be reached at brickburner@gmail.com.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2017 Antiwar.com