During Nixon's historic trip to China in 1972,
his interpreter and I, free for a few hours, conscripted a driver to take us
on a tour of Beijing. Somewhere in my files are photos from that day we toured
the grim city of Chairman Mao in the time of the Great Proletarian Cultural
Revolution.
The interpreter: Charles Freeman – the same Charles Freeman Adm. Dennis Blair
chose to chair the National Intelligence Council that prepares National Intelligence
Estimates on critical national security issues such as Iran's nuclear program.
Educated at Yale and Harvard Law, Freeman has served his country in Delhi,
Taipei, Bangkok, and Beijing. He was Ronald Reagan's deputy assistant secretary
of state for Africa and Bill Clinton's assistant secretary of defense for international
security affairs. George Bush I named him ambassador to Saudi Arabia. Freeman
was our man in Riyadh when Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf and 500,000 U.S. troops
arrived to evict the army of Saddam Hussein from Kuwait.
In 1997, Freeman succeeded George McGovern as president of the Middle East
Policy Council (MEPC) – and he began to speak out.
He opposed the bombing of Serbia and said aloud what few privately deny: Reflexive
support for Israel's repression of the Palestinian people is high among the
reasons America is no longer seen as a beacon of liberation in the Arab and
Muslim world.
Freeman echoed the Obama of yesterday, who bravely blurted, "Nobody is suffering
more than the Palestinian people."
At MEPC, however, Freeman committed a great crime. He published The Israel
Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, which
went onto the New York Times bestseller list – and put Freeman on AIPAC's enemies
list.
Hence, when his name surfaced as Blair's choice to chair the NIC, the Israel
Firsters went berserk, with Steven Rosen declaring him to be a "textbook case
of the old-line Arabism" that infected the Department of State when Gen. George
Marshall was secretary.
And who is Rosen?
A former fixture at AIPAC, Rosen faces imminent federal criminal prosecution
under the Espionage Act for transferring top-secret Pentagon documents to the
Israeli embassy. Rosen's accomplice, Larry Franklin, is serving a 12-year sentence.
Picking up the Rosen dog whistle, the neocommentariat came howling. To Gabriel
Schoenfeld, late of Commentary, Freeman is a "China-coddling Israel
basher." Tom Piatak of Chronicles found no fewer than five blogs from
National Review Online, in two hours, savaging Freeman, two by Jonah
Goldberg and two by Michael Rubin.
Rich Lowry of NR calls Freeman "Chas of Arabia," a diplomat of "odious"
views, a "lap dog" and "blinkered ideologue" who enjoys "pandering to and making
excuses for the world's dictators and terrorists."
To The New Republic's Jonathan Chait, Freeman is a "fanatic." To Jeffrey
Goldberg of the Atlantic, formerly of the Israeli army, Chait's piece
was dead on. To TNR ex-publisher Marty Peretz, Freeman is a "bought
man." To Michael Goldfarb of The Weekly Standard, Freeman is a "shill
for the Saudis," who defends "corrupt Arab states that foment and support terror."
Freeman is denounced as a shill of Saudi Arabia – by people who have spent
careers shilling for the Israeli lobby and Likud.
Within this smear bund (Murray Rothbard's phrase), who has given America a
tenth of the patriotic service and loyalty of Chas Freeman?
What were the specific charges? That, in private life, Freeman advised a Chinese
company. Would the Israel Firsters have used that argument against Al Haig
or Henry Kissinger?
Saudi contributions to MEPC should disqualify Freeman, they say. But what
did they say when Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, David Wurmser, and the rest
with inextricable ties to Israel stove-piped to the press the cherry-picked
War Party propaganda lies about a "Prague connection" between Mohammed Atta
and Iraqi intelligence, yellow cake from Niger, Saddam and al-Qaeda, Saddam
and the anthrax attacks, "mushroom clouds," "aluminum tubes," and WMDs?
Who among them questioned State's decision to hand the Iran portfolio to Dennis
Ross of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a creation of and front
for AIPAC?
Realizing the assaults would not end, Freeman last week withdrew, saying,
"I do not believe the National Intelligence Council could function effectively
while its chair was under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate
attachment to the views of a political faction of a foreign country."
The foreign country is Israel; the political faction Likud.
Nor did Freeman shrink at naming the source of the noxious campaign of slander
against him.
"The tactics of the Israel lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency
and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion
of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the
truth."
"A lobby," Steve Rosen confided in an AIPAC internal memo, "is like a night
flower; it thrives in the dark and dies in the sun."
Yes, and long ago, Al Smith addressed the age-old problem of the Rosens within:
"The best way to kill anything un-American is to drag it out into the open,
because anything un-American cannot live in the sunlight."
Well done, Ambassador Freeman.
COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.