Since Raul Castro seems to be transitioning to
a more permanent position of power, the administration has begun talking about
Cuba policy again. One would think we would be able to survey the results of
the last 45 years and come to logical conclusions. Changing course never seems
to be an option, however, no matter how futile or counterproductive our past
actions have been.
The Cuban embargo began officially in 1962 as a means to put pressure on the
communist dictatorship to change its ways. After 45 years, the Cuban economy
has struggled, but Cuba's dictatorship is no closer to stepping to the beat
of our drum. Any ailments have consistently and successfully been blamed on
U.S. capitalism instead of Cuban communism. They have substituted trade with
others for trade with the U.S., and they are "awash" in development
funds from abroad. Our isolationist policies with regard to Cuba, meanwhile,
have hardly won the hearts and minds of Cubans or Cuban-Americans, many of whom
are isolated from families because this political animosity.
In the name of helping Cubans, the U.S. administration is calling for multibillions
of taxpayer dollars in foreign aid and subsidies for Internet access, education,
and business development for Cubans under the condition that the Cuban government
demonstrates certain changes. In the same breath, they claim lifting the embargo
would only help the dictatorship. This is exactly backward. Free trade is the
best thing for people in both Cuba and the U.S. Government subsidies would enrich
those in power in Cuba at the expense of already overtaxed Americans!
The irony of supposed free-marketeers inducing communists to freedom with government
handouts should not be missed. We call for a free and private press in Cuba
while our attempts to propagandize Cubans through the U.S.-government-run Radio/TV
Marti have wasted $600 million in American taxpayer dollars.
It's time to stop talking solely in terms of what's best for the Cuban people.
How about the wishes of the American people, who are consistently in favor of
diplomacy with Cuba? Let's stop the hysterics about the freedom of Cubans
which is not our government's responsibility and consider freedom of
the American people, which is. Americans want the freedom to travel and trade
with their Cuban neighbors, as they are free to travel and trade with Vietnam
and China. Those Americans who do not wish to interact with a country whose
model of governance they oppose are free to boycott. The point being: it is
Americans who live in a free country, and as free people we should choose
whom to buy from or where to travel not our government.
Our current administration is perceived as irrelevant, at best, in Cuba and
the message is falling on deaf ears there. If the administration really wanted
to extend the hand of friendship, they would allow the American people the freedom
to act as their own ambassadors through trade and travel. Considering the lack
of success government has had in engendering friendship with Cuba, it is time
for government to get out of the way and let the people reach out.