We often hear that the Pentagon exists to defend
our freedoms. But the Pentagon is moving against press freedom.
Not long ago, journalist Sarah Olson received a subpoena to testify
next month in the court-martial of U.S. Army Lt. Ehren Watada, who
now faces prosecution for speaking against the Iraq war and refusing
to participate in it. Apparently, the commanders at the Pentagon are
so eager to punish Watada that they've decided to go after reporters
who have informed the public about his statements.
People who run wars are notoriously hostile to a free press. They're
quick to praise it – unless the reporting goes beyond mere
stenography for the war-makers and actually engages in journalism
that makes the military command uncomfortable.
Evidently, that's why the Pentagon subpoenaed Olson. They want her to testify
to authenticate her quotes from Watada – which is to say, they want to
force her into the prosecution of him. "Army lawyers are overreaching when
they try to prosecute their case by drafting reporters," the Los Angeles
Times noted in a Jan. 8 editorial.
The newspaper added: "No prosecutor should be able to conscript any
reporter into being a deputy by compelling testimony about a
statement made by a source – or go fishing for information beyond
what a reporter presents in a story – unless it's absolutely vital
to protect U.S. citizens from crime or attack. This principle should
apply whether or not the source was speaking in confidence, or
whether or not the reporter works for a media organization."
Olson is a freelancer whose reporting on Watada has appeared on the widely
read Truthout.org Web site and has aired on the nationwide public radio program
Making Contact. (Full disclosure: I was a founder of that program and
served as an adviser.) For a number of years, she has been doing the job of
a journalist. Now, in its dealings with her, the Pentagon is despicably trying
to trample on the First Amendment.
As the LA Times editorialized, "there is something especially
chilling about the U.S. military reaching beyond its traditional authority to
compel a non-military U.S. citizen engaged in news-gathering to testify in a
military court, simply to bolster a court-martial case. … Sustaining the
military subpoena would set a troubling precedent. It's time for the Army to
But the Army hasn't shown any sign of backing off – despite an outcry
from a widening range of eminent journalists, mainstream media institutions,
and First Amendment groups.
"Trying to force a reporter to testify at a court-martial sends the
wrong signal to the media and the military," said the president of
the Military Reporters and Editors organization, James W. Crawley. He
commented: "One of the hallmarks of American journalism, as
documented in the Bill of Rights and defended by our armed services,
is a clear separation of the press and the government. Using
journalists to help the military prosecute its case seems like a
serious breach of that wall."
By sending subpoenas to Sarah Olson and to another journalist who has reported
on Watada (Gregg Kakesako of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin), the Pentagon
is trying to chip away at the proper role of news media.
Two officials of the PEN American Center, a venerable organization
that works to protect freedom of expression, put the issue well in a
recent letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates: "If Olson and
Kakesako respond to these subpoenas by testifying, they will
essentially be participating in the prosecution of their source.
Reporters should not serve as the investigative arm of the
government. Such a role compromises their objectivity and can have
chilling effects on the press."
Writing for Editor & Publisher magazine, Sarah Olson summed up
what is at stake: "A member of the press should never be placed in the
position of aiding a government prosecution of political speech. This goes against
the grain of even the most basic understanding of the First Amendment's free
press guarantees and the expectation of a democracy that relies on a free flow
of information and perspectives without fear of censor or retribution."
And Olson added: "You may ask: Do I want to be sent to prison by the
U.S. Army for not cooperating with their prosecution of Lieutenant
Watada? My answer: Absolutely not. You may also ask: Would I rather
contribute to the prosecution of a news source for sharing newsworthy
perspectives on an affair of national concern? That is the question I
wholly object to having before me in the first place."
The Pentagon's attack on journalism is an attack on the First
Amendment – and an attempt to drive a wedge between journalists and
dissenters in the military. Resistance is essential for democracy.