Has the US Set a March Deadline for War on Iran?

Last month the US issued an ultimatum to Iran, demanding it fully cooperate with the IAEA by March or else face further action and possible measures at the UN Security Council. Micah Zenko, fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, speculates that this “could indicate that the Obama administration is moving toward the zone of immunity logic.”

Zenko is referring to the Israeli standard for deciding to go to war with Iran. Up to now, the Israeli standard to attack Iran is not when it has nuclear weapons or presents an imminent threat to Israel, but rather when Iran’s nuclear program is sufficiently advanced and redundant across the country – although not being weaponized – that Israeli military action would be inadequate to significantly retard it.

The US standard, at least as commonly understood, has been a little stricter. Washington has implied it will resort to war only if Iran is demonstrably weaponizing its nuclear program and on the verge of having a nuclear bomb.

Despite the semantic differences, the two postures are essentially the same. Both the US and Israel have ignored the legal standard for resorting to war – to block an imminent attack, i.e. self-defense – and crafted their own standard, which says they can bomb Iran to smithereens if they judge that at some point in the future Iran might be able to deter US or Israeli aggression. Iran must be kept weak and defenseless, the thinking goes, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to obliterate them at will.

This speaks to Iran’s nuclear posture, which is aimed at what is sometimes called “a breakout capability.” In an environment of constant threats of war, economic sanctions, and being surrounded by the US military, Iran has tried to abstain from developing nuclear weapons while having the know-how needed to get there; this essentially is an attempt to have a deterrent without actually having a deterrent. They don’t get in trouble for having a weapon, but they are able to ward off attack or invasion.

US intelligence corroborates this analysis. As James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, has repeatedly said, “We don’t believe they’ve actually made the decision to go ahead with a nuclear weapon.”

So if the US’s announcement of a March deadline really does indicate a gradual shift toward the more trigger-happy Israeli standard for preemption, “how would this new intelligence be presented as a justification for war?” Zenko asks. After all, “it is tough to make the case for going to war with Iran because it refused to concentrate its nuclear sites (that are under IAEA safeguards) in above-ground facilities that can be easily bombed.”

Setting a March deadline provides some certainty and perhaps coercive leverage to compel Iran to cooperate with the IAEA. But declaring deadlines also places U.S. “credibility” on the line, generating momentum to use force even if there is no new actionable intelligence that Iran has decided to pursue a nuclear weapon. Based on what we know right now, that would be a strategic miscalculation.

A strategic miscalculation…and a savage war crime. Bombing Iran without the justification of self-defense against an imminent attack would be a war crime, a war of aggression. In the words of the Nuremberg Tribunal, “To initiate a war of aggression is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

And the effects of such a war of choice would certainly be evil. As a recent report by former government officials, national security experts and retired military officers concluded “achieving more than a temporary setback in Iran’s nuclear program would require a military operation – including a land occupation – more taxing than the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined.” More taxing, not just in dollar amounts and military resources, but in lives lost.

A recent study from the University of Utah’s Hinckley Institute of Politics found, an attack that tried to take out more than four of Iran’s main enrichment facilities would cause immediate casualties of an estimated “10,000 people.” And according to a 2009 study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies “any strike on the Bushehr nuclear reactor will cause the immediate death of thousands of people living in or adjacent to the site, and thousands of subsequent cancer deaths or even up to hundreds of thousands depending on the population density along the contamination plume.” The fierce insurgency and counter-insurgency efforts that would inevitably take place, including a flood of jihadist fighters from around the world à la Iraq, would mean hundreds of thousands of lives lost.

More than that, an attack on Iran would motivate them to actually start building nuclear weapons in order to deter further aggression, bringing exactly the result the war-mongers claim they’re trying to prevent.

So why would the Obama administration ratchet up the stakes and impose an arbitrary March deadline? They claim there is a diplomatic window. As Clinton explained, “What was meant about the March reference was either about the IAEA and its continuing work or the fact that we finished our election and now would be a good time to test the proposition that there can be some good-faith serious negotiations before the Iranians get into their elections.” Elections make diplomacy harder, so yes, there is a diplomatic window. But the Obama administration may have locked themselves into a box by implicitly adopting the Israeli standard for preemptive war on Iran.

64 thoughts on “Has the US Set a March Deadline for War on Iran?”

  1. Bass fishing is a lovely way to relax. There are always a number of tournaments in the United States, which is the house of the bass among other parts of the world.

  2. Even though fitness is an important part of the lives of many people, there is a lot of information people are missing, partly because the correct resources are not available.

  3. Our products are licensed with Natural Product Numbers (NPN), which means they have been assessed by Health Canada and found to be safe, effective and of high quality under their recommended conditions for use. The natural and premium ingredients are as stated on our product labels.

  4. KayBo Health will be regularly adding new health and beauty products to our product portfolio. To celebrate the launch of every new product, KayBo Health will always happily give discount and special coupons to all of our loyal customers and members of our Review Club.

  5. 51 Puppy Tricks gives puppy owners the tools they need to teach behaviors and tricks to their puppy through step-by-step instructions and photographs. Most other puppy training books focus on curbing bad behavior. Some have training, but only the most basic tricks. Kyra’s curriculum differs from that of 101 Dog Tricks in that the instructions are geared for the less mature dog.

  6. THE MOST EFFECTIVE PHYTOCERAMIDES ON AMAZON – Kaybo Health’s Phytoceramides only use premium quality, scientifically tested ingredients, and vegetarian capsules. Manufactured in the USA, in an FDA-approved facility with strict adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Every batch is 3rd party tested to guarantee the purity and quality of the ingredients. All ingredients used are from the clinical trials that have shown significant skin enhancement.

  7. Only the best ingredients go into our products which are made at home in the United States. The preparation of our products is also 100% strictly governed by GMP guidelines to ensure the best quality products.

  8. Any type of great red blooded American man enjoys his muscle car, which is a quality that he will certainly never lose. I have had a love for the muscle car considering that I was a youthful boy.

  9. High Gear PE318 Activity Pedometer Motion sensitivity switch – increases or decreases unit sensitivity. Step counter 0 to 99,999 steps Distance traveled 0 to 999.99 miles (0 to 999.99 km) Stride distance 11-60 inches (30 to 150 cm) Calorie display 0.1 to 9999.9 kcal Body weight range 65 lbs. to 340 lbs. (30 to 150 kg) Battery type: LR43 1.5V

  10. WHY SUPPLEMENT WITH OMEGA-3 EPA-DHA? Many people who consume a Western diet do not get the Omega-3 ′ s EPA and DHA that their body needs to function at it's optimum. Though many healthy bodies can transform ALA (another Omega-3) into EPA and DHA, the conversion process is unreliable and ineffective. You would require a huge ALA consumption in order to have enough to produce a sufficient supply of DHA and EPA. Our supplement is a simple, inexpensive method to offset this deficiency without significantly altering your diet plan. Taking a quality supplement everyday is the simplest method to guaranteeing that you're getting the Omega-3 ′ s that your body needs to operate efficiently.

  11. "Faking a face-lift may be as easy as taking one little pill daily. It helps to reduce fine lines and wrinkles and improve the structural integrity of the skin." Start seeing results in just one week, then look younger with each week you use it.

  12. KayBo Health will be regularly adding new health and beauty products to our product portfolio. To celebrate the launch of every new product, KayBo Health will always happily give discount and special coupons to all of our loyal customers and members of our Review Club.

  13. All the anglers, specifically those which reside in North Carolina love to compare the lakes in their location as well as just how they make bass fishing a fantastic leisure activity.

  14. The Diet Manual is where the “rubber meets the road.” Unlike those “one-size-fits-all” diets, the 3-Week Diet Manual will show you how to calculate your lean body mass vs. fat percentage and will then provide you with a specifically tailored rapid weight loss plan to suit your body type. You’ll know exactly what to eat every day, how much to eat and when to eat it. You’ll never be guessing—just follow the outline and you WILL lose weight.

Comments are closed.