Being Open About US Propaganda Efforts in Afghanistan

USA Today reports on a study published by the Army’s War College that found “U.S. propaganda efforts in Afghanistan have failed” because the military took bad (and expensive) advice from private contractors.

Examples of failed efforts, according to the paper, include a proposal to pay $6,000 dowries to Afghan men to keep them off the battlefield — a scheme that could have cost $4 billion. That project, ultimately rejected, fits into what the U.S. military calls Information Operations programs.

The dowry program and ineffective television ad campaigns “represent merely the tip of the iceberg: over the years, huge amounts of money have been spent on IO programs that are largely anchored in advertising and marketing style communication with little concurrent investment, it would appear, in detailed understanding of audiences and environments,” the report concludes.

USA TODAY, in a series of reports since 2012, has found the Pentagon has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on poorly tracked propaganda programs. A government report obtained by the newspaper this spring showed the impact of the programs is unclear, and the military doesn’t know whether it is targeting the right foreign audiences. These propaganda efforts include websites, leaflets and broadcasts intended to change foreigners’ “attitudes and behaviors in support of U.S. Government” objectives, according to the report by the Government Accountability Office.

USA Today has provided important articles in the past about propaganda firms working with the Pentagon, hired to employ “the modern equivalent of psychological warfare.” The paper has previously exposed the dubious nature and exorbitant costs of the Pentagon’s “Information Operations,” (IO) or war propaganda, used on foreign populations.

The frank discussion of the failure of U.S. propaganda efforts is fascinating. The dictionary provides a hint as to why:

prop·a·gan·da
noun

  1. derogatory information, esp. of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

So, to reiterate: The U.S. government wastes billions of dollars on failed efforts to “mislead” the Afghan people in a “derogatory” fashion with regard to their thoughts about America.

That might be the best news lede I’ve read in a long time. Who knew it would be so hard to get people you’ve been bombing for ten years to like you?

48 thoughts on “Being Open About US Propaganda Efforts in Afghanistan”

  1. Although not a U.S. citizen but I was really looking forward to this information. Many thanks for sharing this, I was waiting and hoping. Hope these actions can promote the positive aspects of it.

  3. Just as a hypothetical:

    'If', and 'when', the US pulls out of Afghanistan: will Interventionist Ditz here post cherry picked and unsubstantiated, obviously agenda driven, US lame-stream propaganda day after day to support a false 'narrative' about so-called: "barrel bombs", "war crimes", and "humanitarian catastrophe" as a result of whoever ends up ruling Afghanistan? Implying that someone (wink, wink) needs to "DO SOMETHING!!!" to stop it????

    Is this what AW.C is???

    Just wondering…as I am curious about the AW.C narrative and wondering what the AW.C "mission" is overall…

    Potential $ "donors" deserve to know…at least, I think they do…that is: if one believes in "honesty", "integrity", and "transparency"…that is…

    Let me know Glaser…

  5. The propaganda efforts may not be working on the Afghans but it sure is working on the American public.

  7. Terimakasih Artikelnya, sangat bermanfaat untuk kami.

    Herbalmedika menawarkan produk BIOACTIVA Jamu Tetes Herbal Asli Indonesia.

    Bioactiva cara praktis dan mudah menikmati jamu herbal untuk pengobatan komplementer berbagai penyakit degeneratif.

    Call 0821 3485 1327 PIN BB 25A87B74 untuk info selengkapnya.

    Salam Sukses Mulia Untuk Kita Semua.

  10. After a bloody decade-long occupation of multiple countries in the Middle East, the emergence of new terrorist groups, and the disaster in Benghazi, two lessons from the past ten years should be that we aren’t able to predict the unintended consequences

  11. After a bloody decade-long occupation of multiple countries in the Middle East, the emergence of new terrorist groups, and the disaster in Benghazi, two lessons from the past ten years should be that we arena??t able to predict the unintended consequences

  34. Thanks this web site is really a walk-through for all of the info you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll definitely…rebelmouse

  35. This is very interesting content! I have thoroughly enjoyed reading your points and have come to the conclusion that you are right about many of them. You are great…rebelmouse

  43. The waiting Anthony Oliver, who hits a game-sealing three pointer. Tolliver runs down the court laughing to himself like a man who absolutely cannot believe his miraculous good fortune….seo

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos